Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Roma, Italy.
Department of Medicine and Surgery, Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Roma, Italy.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2024 Dec;32(12):3261-3271. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12349. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
Patient dissatisfaction rates following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) reported in the literature reach 20%. The optimal coronal alignment is still under debate. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare clinical outcomes in different coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) phenotypes undergoing mechanically aligned (MA) TKA. The hypothesis was that knees with preoperative varus arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) would achieve inferior clinical outcomes after surgery compared to other aHKA categories. Additionally, another objective was to assess CPAK phenotypes distribution in the study population.
A retrospective selection was made of 180 patients who underwent MA TKA from April 2021 to December 2022, with a 1-year follow-up. Coronal knee alignment was classified according to the CPAK classification. Clinical outcome evaluations were measured using the Knee Society Score (KSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Short Form Survey 12 and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS). Differences in clinical outcomes were considered statistically significant with a p value <0 .05.
Patients with varus aHKA achieved significantly inferior outcomes at final follow-up compared to other aHKA categories in KSS pt. 1 (79.7 ± 17.2 vs. 85.6 ± 14.7; p = 0.028), OKS (39.2 ± 9.2 vs. 42.2 ± 7.2; p = 0.019) and FJS (75.4 ± 31.0 vs. 87.4 ± 22.9; p =0 .003). The most common aHKA category was the varus category (39%). The most common CPAK phenotypes were apex distal Types I (23.9%), II (22.8%) and III (13.3%).
MA TKA does not yield uniform outcomes across all CPAK phenotypes. Varus aHKA category shows significantly inferior results at final follow-up. The most prevalent CPAK categories are varus aHKA and apex distal JLO, with phenotypes I, II and III being the most common. However, their gender distribution varies significantly.
Level IV.
文献报道全膝关节置换术(TKA)后患者满意度率达到 20%。最佳冠状面对线仍存在争议。本回顾性研究旨在比较机械对线(MA)TKA 不同冠状面对线(CPAK)表型的临床结果。假设术前内翻算术髋膝踝角(aHKA)的膝关节术后临床结果较差,与其他 aHKA 类别相比。此外,另一个目标是评估研究人群中 CPAK 表型的分布。
对 2021 年 4 月至 2022 年 12 月期间接受 MA TKA 的 180 例患者进行回顾性选择,随访 1 年。根据 CPAK 分类对膝关节冠状面对线进行分类。临床结果评估采用膝关节学会评分(KSS)、牛津膝关节评分(OKS)、短格式调查 12 项和遗忘关节评分(FJS)。p 值<0.05 时认为临床结果差异有统计学意义。
与其他 aHKA 类别相比,术前内翻 aHKA 的患者在最终随访时的 KSS pt.1(79.7±17.2 与 85.6±14.7;p=0.028)、OKS(39.2±9.2 与 42.2±7.2;p=0.019)和 FJS(75.4±31.0 与 87.4±22.9;p=0.003)方面的结果明显较差。最常见的 aHKA 类别为内翻型(39%)。最常见的 CPAK 表型为尖底 I 型(23.9%)、II 型(22.8%)和 III 型(13.3%)。
MA TKA 在所有 CPAK 表型中均未产生一致的结果。内翻 aHKA 类别在最终随访时的结果明显较差。最常见的 CPAK 类别为内翻 aHKA 和尖底 JLO,表型 I、II 和 III 最为常见。然而,它们的性别分布差异很大。
IV 级。