Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Heart Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Dec;78(6):1524-1530. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.08.100. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
To evaluate the rationale of an aggressive endovascular-first strategy to treat elderly patients with acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) by studying long-term survival, readmissions, and patients' discharge to home vs nursing facility a decade after an episode of AMI.
The retrospective study cohort included 66 consecutive patients (all-comers) treated for arterial occlusive AMI between 2009 and 2013. Endovascular revascularization (EVR) was attempted in 50 patients (EVR+), whereas 16 patients were treated without attempted revascularization (EVR-). All patients were followed until death or September 2022. Studied outcomes included discharge status, long-term survival and cause of death and readmissions related to AMI.
The mean age of all 66 patients was 78 ± 10 years: 79 ± 9 years in the EVR+ group and 76 ± 12 years in the EVR- group. EVR was technically successful in 44 patients (88%); three patients underwent subsequent open revascularization after EVR failure. One-third required bowel resection after EVR. The 30-day mortality for all patients was 44%; 32% in the EVR+ group and 81% in the EVR- group. Only two survivors were permanently institutionalized, whereas all others were discharged to the same place they lived prior to the AMI episode. There were four AMI-related readmissions during the follow-up; all were in the EVR+ group. Two patients underwent reinterventions for recurrent AMI. One-year survival was 52% for EVR+ and 19% for EVR- patients. Five-year survival rates were 18% and 13%, respectively. The causes of deaths were mesenteric ischemia in 22, other cardiovascular event in 21, and non-cardiovascular cause in 19 patients. Four patients were alive at the end of the follow-up.
In this unselected elderly population with AMI, the aggressive strategy to attempt EVR resulted in a high revascularization rate and favorable outcomes. The high proportion of patients returning to their prior living status and low readmission rate after survival from AMI encourages active treatment of high-functioning elderly patients.
通过研究急性肠系膜缺血(AMI)发作 10 年后的长期生存率、再入院率以及患者出院回家与护理机构的情况,评估对老年 AMI 患者采用积极的血管内优先策略的合理性。
这项回顾性研究队列纳入了 2009 年至 2013 年间接受动脉闭塞性 AMI 治疗的 66 例连续患者(所有患者)。50 例患者(EVR+)尝试了血管内再血管化(EVR),16 例患者未尝试再血管化(EVR-)。所有患者均随访至死亡或 2022 年 9 月。研究结果包括出院情况、长期生存率以及与 AMI 相关的死亡原因和再入院情况。
66 例患者的平均年龄为 78±10 岁:EVR+组为 79±9 岁,EVR-组为 76±12 岁。44 例(88%)EVR 技术成功;3 例 EVR 失败后行后续开放再血管化。三分之一的患者在 EVR 后需要进行肠切除术。所有患者的 30 天死亡率为 44%;EVR+组为 32%,EVR-组为 81%。只有两名幸存者永久性地被安置在护理机构,而其他所有患者都出院回到 AMI 发作前居住的地方。在随访期间有 4 例与 AMI 相关的再入院,均在 EVR+组。2 例患者因复发性 AMI 接受再介入治疗。EVR+患者的 1 年生存率为 52%,EVR-患者的生存率为 19%。5 年生存率分别为 18%和 13%。死亡原因分别为肠系膜缺血 22 例,其他心血管事件 21 例,非心血管原因 19 例。在随访结束时,有 4 名患者存活。
在这项未经选择的老年 AMI 人群中,积极尝试 EVR 的策略导致了较高的再血管化率和良好的结果。在 AMI 存活后,大量患者返回之前的生活状态且再入院率较低,这鼓励对高功能老年患者进行积极治疗。