1Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
2Bark City Veterinary Specialists, Park City, UT.
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2023 Aug 16;261(11):1623-1627. doi: 10.2460/javma.23.04.0209. Print 2023 Nov 1.
To compare the success rates for urethral catheterization in clinical patients using the traditional and 2-catheter techniques when placed by personnel of all experience levels.
38 female cats and dogs weighing less than 10 kg were prospectively enrolled.
Enrolled animals were randomized to have a urethral catheter placed by the traditional technique or the 2-catheter method under sedation or general anesthesia. Any qualified hospital personnel of any experience level were allowed to place the catheter. If after 5 minutes the animal was not successfully catheterized, the alternate method was performed. The previous experience of the catheter placer, animal signalment, animal condition that necessitated catheter placement, time to successful placement, and which technique was successful was recorded.
The 2-catheter technique was more successful than the traditional method (60.5% and 34.2%, respectively) for urethral catheterization when used by a variety of hospital personnel. The 2-catheter technique was successful in 63.3% of dogs and 66.6% of cats, while the traditional method was successful in 36.6% of dogs and 33.3% of cats. Eight of 9 (88.9%) novice catheter placers that placed their first urinary catheter in this study succeeded with the 2-catheter technique and only 1 was successful with the traditional method.
The 2-catheter technique has a higher rate of success for placement of female urinary catheters in small patients that are unable to have concurrent digital palpation. This technique may also be helpful in the inexperienced catheter placer population to aid in guidance into the urethral papilla.
比较在所有经验水平的人员使用传统和双导管技术进行临床患者导尿时的成功率。
前瞻性纳入 38 只体重小于 10kg 的雌性猫和狗。
将纳入的动物随机分为两组,在镇静或全身麻醉下分别使用传统技术或双导管方法进行导尿。允许任何经验水平的合格医院人员进行导尿。如果 5 分钟后动物仍未成功导尿,则进行另一种方法。记录导管插入者的先前经验、动物特征、需要导尿的动物状况、成功放置时间以及哪种技术成功。
在各种医院人员使用时,双导管技术比传统方法(分别为 60.5%和 34.2%)更成功地进行导尿。双导管技术在 63.3%的犬和 66.6%的猫中成功,而传统方法在 36.6%的犬和 33.3%的猫中成功。在本研究中,9 名新手导管插入者中的 8 名(88.9%)首次使用双导管技术成功,而只有 1 名使用传统方法成功。
在无法同时进行数字触诊的小患者中,双导管技术对于女性导尿的放置成功率更高。对于经验不足的导管插入者,这种技术也可能有助于引导进入尿道乳头。