Ren Ke, Ji Xinwei, Chen Yi, Luo Huilong, Su Jiaen, Jiang Yonglei
Yunnan Academy of Tobacco Agricultural Sciences, Kunming, 650031, China.
College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China.
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 16;13(1):13301. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40015-w.
So far, coal, petroleum, and natural gas are still the most widely used fuels, and the emissions of SO, NO and particulate matter produced from their combustion have a serious influence on the air. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a clean fuel. In this study, the bulk curing barns were equipped with different fuel equipment, Barn A used traditional coal heating equipment; Barn B used biomass briquettes fuel (BBF) integrated heating equipment; Barn C equipped with alcohol-based fuel (ABF) heating equipment. The temperature of the outer surface of the heating equipment, the exhaust gas of the chimney, and the curing heat efficiency and energy consumption were analyzed. Compared with the barn BBF and barn coal, the barn ABF can meet the flue-cured tobacco curing highest temperature requirements of 68 °C, the accuracy of the target dry bulb temperature (DBT) curve during the curing of flue-cured tobacco was 93.4%. At the same time, during ABF combustion, the emissions of CO and CO were 40.82% and 0.19%, respectively. However, no emissions of NO, SO, and HS were detected in the chimney exhaust. Compared with the barn BBF and barn coal, the thermal efficiency of barn ABF heating equipment in the barn was increased by 44.78% and 86.28%, respectively. Additionally, the coast per kilogram of dry tobacco was reduced by 19.44% and 45.28%, respectively. Therefore, compared to barn coal and barn BBF, the barn ABF can control temperature changes more accurately, and shows an obvious advantage in environmental protection and heat utilization efficiency.
到目前为止,煤炭、石油和天然气仍然是使用最广泛的燃料,它们燃烧产生的二氧化硫、氮氧化物和颗粒物排放对空气有严重影响。因此,开发一种清洁燃料很有必要。在本研究中,密集烤房配备了不同的燃料设备,A烤房使用传统煤炭加热设备;B烤房使用生物质成型燃料(BBF)集成加热设备;C烤房配备醇基燃料(ABF)加热设备。分析了加热设备外表面温度、烟囱废气以及烘烤热效率和能耗。与B烤房和煤炭烤房相比,C烤房能满足烤烟烘烤68℃的最高温度要求,烤烟烘烤过程中目标干球温度(DBT)曲线的准确率为93.4%。同时,在ABF燃烧过程中,一氧化碳和二氧化碳的排放量分别为40.82%和0.19%。然而,烟囱废气中未检测到氮氧化物、二氧化硫和硫化氢的排放。与B烤房和煤炭烤房相比,C烤房内ABF加热设备的热效率分别提高了44.78%和86.28%。此外,每千克干烟叶成本分别降低了19.44%和45.28%。因此,与煤炭烤房和B烤房相比,C烤房能更精确地控制温度变化,在环境保护和热利用效率方面具有明显优势。