School of Public Health, University of Nevada, 1664 N. Virginia St. MC 0274, Reno, NV, 89557, USA.
The Mountain Center Harm Reduction Center, 1000 North Paseo de Onate, Española, NM, USA.
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2023 Aug 16;18(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13722-023-00401-1.
We examined acceptability of and preferences for potential medications for treating methamphetamine use disorder (MUD) among people who use methamphetamine and examined how benefits and drawbacks of methamphetamine use affect perceived acceptability and preferences.
We conducted qualitative interviews as part of a larger study in 2019-2020. The interview assessed patterns of substance use (including methamphetamine), benefits and drawbacks of methamphetamine use, and interest in a medication to treat MUD. Analysis used an inductive thematic approach, guided by three primary questions: (1) would participants be interested in taking a potential medication for MUD?; (2) what effects would they would like from such a medication?; and (3) what would their ideal treatment route and schedule be (e.g. daily pill, monthly injection)?.
We interviewed 20 people reporting methamphetamine use in the past 3 months (10 from Reno, Nevada, USA and 10 from Rio Arriba County, New Mexico, USA). Seven used exclusively methamphetamine, while thirteen used other substances in addition to methamphetamine. Most were enthusiastic about a potential medication to treat MUD. Of those who were not interested (n = 5), all indicated no current concerns about their methamphetamine use. Perceived functional benefits of methamphetamine use (i.e., energy, counteracting opioid sedation, and improved social and emotional wellbeing) informed preferences for a replacement-type medication that would confer the same benefits while mitigating drawbacks (e.g., psychosis, hallucinations, withdrawal). Opinions on preferred dosing varied, with some preferring longer acting medications for convenience, while others preferred daily dosing that would align with existing routines.
Participants were excited about a potential for a medication to treat MUD. Their preferences were informed by the functional role of methamphetamine in their lives and a desire to maintain the stimulant effects while mitigating harms of illicit methamphetamine. Treatment outcomes that emphasize functioning and wellbeing, rather than abstinence, should be explored.
我们研究了使用甲基苯丙胺(METH)的人对治疗甲基苯丙胺使用障碍(MUD)的潜在药物的可接受性和偏好,并研究了 METH 使用的好处和弊端如何影响可接受性和偏好。
我们在 2019-2020 年进行了定性访谈,作为一项更大研究的一部分。访谈评估了物质使用模式(包括 METH)、METH 使用的好处和弊端,以及对治疗 MUD 的药物的兴趣。分析采用了一种归纳主题方法,由三个主要问题指导:(1)参与者是否有兴趣服用治疗 MUD 的潜在药物?;(2)他们希望从这样的药物中得到什么效果?;(3)他们理想的治疗途径和时间表是什么(例如,每天一粒药丸,每月注射一次)?。
我们采访了 20 名报告过去 3 个月内使用 METH 的人(10 名来自美国内华达州里诺市,10 名来自美国新墨西哥州里奥阿比县)。7 人仅使用 METH,13 人除了 METH 外还使用其他物质。大多数人对治疗 MUD 的潜在药物非常感兴趣。对那些不感兴趣的人(n=5),所有人都表示目前对他们的 METH 使用没有担忧。METH 使用的感知功能益处(即能量、对抗阿片类药物镇静作用以及改善社会和情绪健康)为替代型药物的偏好提供了信息,这些药物会带来相同的益处,同时减轻弊端(例如精神病、幻觉、戒断)。对最佳剂量的意见各不相同,有些人喜欢更长效的药物以方便,而有些人则更喜欢与现有习惯一致的每日剂量。
参与者对治疗 MUD 的潜在药物感到兴奋。他们的偏好受到 METH 在他们生活中的功能作用的影响,以及渴望在减轻非法 METH 危害的同时保持兴奋剂的影响。应该探索强调功能和健康的治疗结果,而不是禁欲。