Baettig S J, Filipovic M G, Hebeisen M, Meierhans R, Ganter M T
Institute of Anaesthesiology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital Berne University Hospital, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland.
Anaesthesia. 2023 Nov;78(11):1327-1337. doi: 10.1111/anae.16117. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
Point-of-care gastric sonography offers an objective approach to assessing individual pulmonary aspiration risk before induction of general anaesthesia. We aimed to evaluate the potential impact of routine pre-operative gastric ultrasound on peri-operative management in a cohort of adult patients undergoing elective or emergency surgery at a single centre. According to pre-operative gastric ultrasound results, patients were classified as low risk (empty, gastric fluid volume ≤ 1.5 ml.kg body weight) or high risk (solid, mixed or gastric fluid volume > 1.5 ml.kg body weight) of aspiration. After sonography, examiners were asked to indicate changes in aspiration risk management (none; more conservative; more liberal) to their pre-defined anaesthetic plan and to adapt it if patient safety was at risk. We included 2003 patients, 1246 (62%) of which underwent elective and 757 (38%) emergency surgery. Among patients who underwent elective surgery, 1046/1246 (84%) had a low-risk and 178/1246 (14%) a high-risk stomach, with this being 587/757 (78%) vs. 158/757 (21%) among patients undergoing emergency surgery, respectively. Routine pre-operative gastric sonography enabled changes in anaesthetic management in 379/2003 (19%) of patients, with these being a more liberal approach in 303/2003 (15%). In patients undergoing elective surgery, pre-operative gastric sonography would have allowed a more liberal approach in 170/1246 (14%) and made a more conservative approach indicated in 52/1246 (4%), whereas in patients undergoing emergency surgery, 133/757 (18%) would have been managed more liberally and 24/757 (3%) more conservatively. We showed that pre-operative gastric ultrasound helps to identify high- and low-risk situations in patients at risk of aspiration and adds useful information to peri-operative management. Our data suggest that routine use of pre-operative gastric ultrasound may improve individualised care and potentially impact patient safety.
床旁胃部超声检查为评估全身麻醉诱导前个体的肺误吸风险提供了一种客观方法。我们旨在评估常规术前胃部超声检查对单中心接受择期或急诊手术的成年患者队列围手术期管理的潜在影响。根据术前胃部超声检查结果,将患者分为误吸低风险(胃内空虚、胃液量≤1.5 ml/kg体重)或高风险(胃内有固体、混合物质或胃液量>1.5 ml/kg体重)。超声检查后,要求检查人员指出其预先确定的麻醉计划中误吸风险管理的变化(无变化;更保守;更宽松),并在患者安全有风险时进行调整。我们纳入了2003例患者,其中1246例(62%)接受择期手术,757例(38%)接受急诊手术。在接受择期手术的患者中,1046/1246(84%)胃风险低,178/1246(14%)胃风险高,而在接受急诊手术的患者中分别为587/757(78%)和158/757(21%)。常规术前胃部超声检查使379/2003(19%)的患者麻醉管理发生了变化,其中303/2003(15%)采用了更宽松的方法。在接受择期手术的患者中,术前胃部超声检查本可使170/1246(14%)采用更宽松的方法,使52/1246(4%)采用更保守的方法,而在接受急诊手术的患者中,133/757(18%)本可采用更宽松的管理,24/757(3%)采用更保守的管理。我们表明,术前胃部超声有助于识别有误吸风险患者的高风险和低风险情况,并为围手术期管理增加有用信息。我们的数据表明,常规使用术前胃部超声可能会改善个体化护理并潜在影响患者安全。