Suppr超能文献

经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射治疗单侧腰骶神经根性疼痛的神经上-神经下入路(SIAMESE):一项随机非劣效性试验的研究方案

Supraneural Infraneural Approach to transforaMinal Epidural StEroid injection for unilateral lumbosacral radicular pain (SIAMESE): a study protocol for a randomised non-inferiority trial.

作者信息

Galley Helen F, Adam Rosalind, Columb Malachy O, Onyeakazi Uzunma M, Kanakarajan Saravanakumar

机构信息

School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.

Manchester University Hospitals Trust, Wythenshawe, UK.

出版信息

BJA Open. 2023 Feb 16;5:100126. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2023.100126. eCollection 2023 Mar.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lumbosacral radicular pain is commonly treated by transforaminal steroid epidural injection. There are two methods: the supraneural and the infraneural approaches. The supraneural approach can result in rare but catastrophic consequences from injury to the radiculomedullary artery. The infraneural technique avoids the artery; both approaches show efficacy and are used locally.

METHODS

This is a protocol for a randomised, single-blinded, non-inferiority trial of infraneural supraneural transforaminal epidural injection for lumbosacral radicular pain at a tertiary referral pain management clinic. Adult patients (=92) with moderate-to-severe lumbosacral radicular pain of >3 months duration, scheduled for transforaminal epidural steroid injection, will be randomised to epidural by either the infraneural or supraneural approach. Only the treating physicians will know which route is used. The primary outcome measure is the differential impact on pain intensity score at 3 months. Secondary outcome measures will include disability and function scores, sleep and activity measures, and adverse events. Participants will be followed up for 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

This study will determine whether the techniques are comparable and, if so, will enable recommendations for the use of an approach without risk of artery damage and catastrophic injury.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN 36195887.

摘要

背景

腰骶部神经根性疼痛通常采用经椎间孔类固醇硬膜外注射治疗。有两种方法:神经上入路和神经下入路。神经上入路可能因损伤神经根髓动脉而导致罕见但灾难性的后果。神经下入路可避免损伤该动脉;两种方法均显示出疗效且在当地广泛应用。

方法

这是一项在三级转诊疼痛管理诊所进行的随机、单盲、非劣效性试验方案,比较神经下入路与神经上入路经椎间孔硬膜外注射治疗腰骶部神经根性疼痛的效果。年龄≥92岁、患有持续时间超过3个月的中重度腰骶部神经根性疼痛且计划接受经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射的成年患者,将被随机分入神经下入路或神经上入路硬膜外注射组。只有治疗医生知道所采用的路径。主要结局指标是3个月时对疼痛强度评分的差异影响。次要结局指标将包括残疾和功能评分、睡眠和活动指标以及不良事件。参与者将接受12个月的随访。

结论

本研究将确定这两种技术是否具有可比性,如果是,则能够推荐使用一种无动脉损伤和灾难性损伤风险的方法。

临床试验注册

ISRCTN 36195887。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37a5/10430835/f29125a5b94a/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验