Malone Celeste M, Barclift MyLea
Department of Human Development and Psychoeducational Studies, School of Education, Howard University.
Sch Psychol. 2024 Nov;39(6):691-701. doi: 10.1037/spq0000572. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
School psychologists are well-positioned to serve as advocates for marginalized students to address educational inequities and challenge systemic barriers to well-being. However, if they do not personally endorse social justice values, they may be unwilling to take personal and professional risks to engage in social justice work. The purpose of this study was to examine the extent to which personal characteristics and multicultural competence are associated with social justice values in school psychology graduate students. A sample of 108 graduate students completed the Social Justice Scale, School Psychology Multicultural Competence Scale, and Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Participants strongly endorsed having social justice values; however, they were less likely to report being in a context supportive of social justice work. There was no difference in reported social justice values based on gender or race; however, sexual marginalized students and those with very liberal political ideology reported more positive attitudes toward social justice. Students with very liberal political ideology also reported greater intent to engage in social justice actions in the future. Additionally, there were several positive correlations between social justice values and perceived multicultural competence. Multicultural competence accounted for most of the variance in participants' perceived ability to engage in social justice actions and being in environments supportive of social justice, while personal characteristics explained most of the variance in participants' intent to engage in future social justice actions. Notably, political ideology was the most consistent predictor of social justice values. Findings and implications for graduate education programs are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
学校心理学家处于有利地位,能够为边缘化学生代言,以解决教育不平等问题,并挑战影响幸福的系统性障碍。然而,如果他们个人不认同社会正义价值观,可能就不愿意承担个人和职业风险去从事社会正义工作。本研究的目的是考察学校心理学研究生的个人特征和多元文化能力在多大程度上与社会正义价值观相关。108名研究生样本完成了社会正义量表、学校心理学多元文化能力量表和马洛-克劳恩社会赞许性量表。参与者强烈认同拥有社会正义价值观;然而,他们不太可能报告所处的环境支持社会正义工作。在报告的社会正义价值观方面,基于性别或种族没有差异;然而,性取向边缘化的学生和具有非常自由政治意识形态的学生对社会正义的态度更为积极。具有非常自由政治意识形态的学生还报告称,他们未来参与社会正义行动的意愿更强。此外,社会正义价值观与感知到的多元文化能力之间存在若干正相关。多元文化能力在很大程度上解释了参与者参与社会正义行动以及处于支持社会正义环境中的感知能力差异,而个人特征在很大程度上解释了参与者未来参与社会正义行动意愿的差异。值得注意的是,政治意识形态是社会正义价值观最一致的预测因素。文中讨论了这些发现及其对研究生教育项目的启示。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》(c)2024美国心理学会,保留所有权利)