• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

科学传播的个人化:科学传播中自我表露的矛盾影响对科学的信任。

Science communication gets personal: Ambivalent effects of self-disclosure in science communication on trust in science.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat Munchen.

Deutsches Museum.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Appl. 2023 Dec;29(4):793-812. doi: 10.1037/xap0000489. Epub 2023 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1037/xap0000489
PMID:37589716
Abstract

In an attempt to display themselves as warm, approachable, and trustworthy, researchers might reveal personal details about themselves (i.e., self-disclosure) when communicating their science to the public. Here, we test whether self-disclosure in science communication can actually increase public trust in science. We present six online experiments (overall = 2,431), integrate their results in a mini meta-analysis, and report a field experiment in a science museum ( = 480): In sum, our findings suggest that self-disclosure leads to small, but measurable increases in laypeople's feelings of closeness toward researchers and perceptions of researchers' warmth-related trustworthiness; yet, self-disclosure also leads to decreases in competence-related trustworthiness perceptions. The credibility of scientific findings was, overall, unaffected by self-disclosing communication. Findings from the field study further question whether self-disclosure in science communication has any practical relevance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

为了表现出热情、平易近人和值得信赖的形象,研究人员在向公众传播科学知识时,可能会透露一些个人信息(即自我披露)。在这里,我们检验了科学传播中的自我披露是否真的可以增加公众对科学的信任。我们进行了六项在线实验(总计 = 2431),并将其结果整合在一个小型元分析中,还在一个科学博物馆进行了现场实验( = 480):总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,自我披露会使公众对研究人员的亲近感和对研究人员与温暖相关的信任度的感知产生微小但可衡量的增加;然而,自我披露也会导致对能力相关的信任度的感知下降。科学发现的可信度总体上不受自我披露交流的影响。现场研究的结果进一步质疑了科学传播中的自我披露是否具有任何实际意义。

相似文献

1
Science communication gets personal: Ambivalent effects of self-disclosure in science communication on trust in science.科学传播的个人化:科学传播中自我表露的矛盾影响对科学的信任。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2023 Dec;29(4):793-812. doi: 10.1037/xap0000489. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
2
When research is me-search: How researchers' motivation to pursue a topic affects laypeople's trust in science.当研究变成自我研究:研究人员追求某个话题的动机如何影响公众对科学的信任。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 9;16(7):e0253911. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253911. eCollection 2021.
3
Gaining trust as well as respect in communicating to motivated audiences about science topics.在与积极主动的受众就科学话题进行交流时获得信任和尊重。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Sep 16;111 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):13593-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317505111. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
4
Communicating trust and trustworthiness through scientists' biographies: Benevolence beliefs.通过科学家传记传达信任和值得信赖:仁爱信念。
Public Underst Sci. 2024 Oct;33(7):872-883. doi: 10.1177/09636625241228733. Epub 2024 Feb 18.
5
Replication crisis = trust crisis? The effect of successful vs failed replications on laypeople's trust in researchers and research.复制危机=信任危机?成功与失败的复制对非专业人士对研究人员和研究的信任的影响。
Public Underst Sci. 2020 Apr;29(3):270-288. doi: 10.1177/0963662520902383. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
6
No harm in being self-corrective: Self-criticism and reform intentions increase researchers' epistemic trustworthiness and credibility in the eyes of the public.自我修正并无害处:自我批评和改革意图会增加研究人员在公众眼中的认知可信度和信誉。
Public Underst Sci. 2021 Nov;30(8):962-976. doi: 10.1177/09636625211022181. Epub 2021 Jun 20.
7
Trusting strangers: The benefits of reciprocal self-disclosure during online computer-mediated communication and mediating role of interpersonal liking.信任陌生人:在线计算机中介交流中互惠自我表露的好处,以及人际喜欢的中介作用。
Int J Psychol. 2024 Feb;59(1):143-154. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12957. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
8
How the public evaluates media representations of uncertain science: An integrated explanatory framework.公众如何评价不确定科学的媒体呈现:一个综合的解释框架。
Public Underst Sci. 2023 May;32(4):410-427. doi: 10.1177/09636625221122960. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
9
Dispositional pathways to trust: Self-esteem and agreeableness interact to predict trust and negative emotional disclosure.性格影响信任的形成途径:自尊和宜人性相互作用,共同预测信任和负面情绪的表露。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Jul;113(1):95-116. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000093. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
10
Virtual Reality for Teletherapy: Avatars May Combine the Benefits of Face-to-Face Communication with the Anonymity of Online Text-Based Communication.虚拟现实远程治疗:化身或许可以结合面对面交流的好处和基于网络文本交流的匿名性。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2019 Feb;22(2):158-165. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2018.0247. Epub 2018 Dec 12.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of worldviews, radicalization risk factors, and personality in harassment of scientists.世界观、激进化风险因素及性格在科学家受骚扰事件中的作用。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 8;15(1):1261. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85208-7.
2
Who is at risk of bias? Examining dispositional differences in motivated science reception.谁有偏见风险?审视动机性科学接受中的性格差异。
Public Underst Sci. 2025 Feb;34(2):243-255. doi: 10.1177/09636625241262611. Epub 2024 Jul 31.