• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迭代变革:通过 STEM 教师研究院(STEMFI)提升以学生为中心的教学。

Iterating toward change: Improving student-centered teaching through the STEM faculty institute (STEMFI).

机构信息

Department of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United States of America.

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Aug 17;18(8):e0289464. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289464. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0289464
PMID:37590212
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10434963/
Abstract

One of the primary reasons why students leave STEM majors is due to the poor quality of instruction. Teaching practices can be improved through professional development programs; however, several barriers exist. Creating lasting change by overcoming these barriers is the primary objective of the STEM Faculty Institute (STEMFI). STEMFI was designed according to the framework established by Ajzen's Theory of Planned Behavior. To evaluate its effectiveness, the Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS) tool was used before and after an intensive year-long faculty development program and analyzed using copusprofiles.org, a tool that classifies each COPUS report into one of three instructional styles: didactic, interactive lecture, and student-centered. We report the success of our program in changing faculty teaching behaviors and we categorize them into types of reformers. Then, thematically coded post-participation interviews give us clues into the characteristics of each type of reformer. Our results demonstrate that faculty can significantly improve the student-centeredness of their teaching practices in a relatively short time. We also discuss the implications of faculty attitudes for future professional development efforts.

摘要

学生离开 STEM 专业的主要原因之一是教学质量差。可以通过专业发展计划来改进教学实践,但存在一些障碍。克服这些障碍以实现持久变革是 STEM 教师学院(STEMFI)的主要目标。STEMFI 是根据 Ajzen 的计划行为理论建立的框架设计的。为了评估其效果,在为期一年的密集教师发展计划前后使用了本科生 STEM 课堂观察协议(COPUS)工具,并使用 copusprofiles.org 进行了分析,该工具将每份 COPUS 报告分类为三种教学风格之一:说教式、互动式讲座和以学生为中心。我们报告了我们的计划在改变教师教学行为方面的成功,并将他们分类为改革者类型。然后,对参与后的主题编码访谈为我们提供了每种改革者类型的特征线索。我们的结果表明,教师可以在相对较短的时间内显著提高他们的以学生为中心的教学实践。我们还讨论了教师态度对未来专业发展努力的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdeb/10434963/5d6f68d79004/pone.0289464.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdeb/10434963/e9a7a2017dd7/pone.0289464.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdeb/10434963/5d6f68d79004/pone.0289464.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdeb/10434963/e9a7a2017dd7/pone.0289464.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fdeb/10434963/5d6f68d79004/pone.0289464.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Iterating toward change: Improving student-centered teaching through the STEM faculty institute (STEMFI).迭代变革:通过 STEM 教师研究院(STEMFI)提升以学生为中心的教学。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 17;18(8):e0289464. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289464. eCollection 2023.
2
Are Faculty Changing? How Reform Frameworks, Sampling Intensities, and Instrument Measures Impact Inferences about Student-Centered Teaching Practices.教师在改变吗?改革框架、抽样强度和工具测量如何影响对以学生为中心的教学实践的推断。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2021 Sep;20(3):ar39. doi: 10.1187/cbe.20-11-0259.
3
Interpret with Caution: COPUS Instructional Styles May Not Differ in Terms of Practices That Support Student Learning.谨慎解读:COPUS 教学风格在支持学生学习的实践方面可能没有差异。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2021 Jun;20(2):ar26. doi: 10.1187/cbe.20-09-0218.
4
Comparison of Cluster Analysis Methodologies for Characterization of Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS) Data.比较分析方法在本科 STEM 课堂观察协议(COPUS)数据特征描述中的应用。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2021 Mar;20(1):ar3. doi: 10.1187/cbe.20-04-0077.
5
Factors that influence STEM faculty use of evidence-based instructional practices: An ecological model.影响 STEM 教师使用循证教学实践的因素:一个生态模型。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 31;18(1):e0281290. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281290. eCollection 2023.
6
Improving undergraduate STEM education: The efficacy of discipline-based professional development.提升本科阶段 STEM 教育:基于学科的专业发展的功效。
Sci Adv. 2017 Feb 15;3(2):e1600193. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1600193. eCollection 2017 Feb.
7
The Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS): a new instrument to characterize university STEM classroom practices.本科理工科课堂观察协议(COPUS):一种描述大学理工科课堂教学实践的新工具。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2013 Winter;12(4):618-27. doi: 10.1187/cbe.13-08-0154.
8
Environmental influences and individual characteristics that affect learner-centered teaching practices.影响以学习者为中心的教学实践的环境影响因素和个体特征。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 30;16(4):e0250760. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250760. eCollection 2021.
9
Institutionalizing evidence-based STEM reform through faculty professional development and support structures.通过教师专业发展和支持结构将基于证据的STEM改革制度化。
Int J STEM Educ. 2022;9(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40594-022-00353-z. Epub 2022 May 12.
10
Exploring the Complementarity of Measures of Instructional Practices.探索教学实践衡量指标的互补性。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2023 Mar;22(1):ar1. doi: 10.1187/cbe.22-03-0047.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact and effectiveness of faculty development program in fostering the faculty's knowledge, skills, and professional competence: A systematic review and meta-analysis.教师发展计划在培养教师知识、技能和专业能力方面的影响与效果:一项系统综述与荟萃分析。
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2019 May;26(4):688-697. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.10.024. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
2
Anatomy of STEM teaching in North American universities.北美大学 STEM 教学的剖析。
Science. 2018 Mar 30;359(6383):1468-1470. doi: 10.1126/science.aap8892. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
3
STEM crisis or STEM surplus? Yes and yes.
STEM危机还是STEM过剩?既是危机,也是过剩。
Mon Labor Rev. 2015 May;2015. doi: 10.21916/mlr.2015.14. Epub 2015 May 26.
4
Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics.主动学习可提高学生在科学、工程和数学领域的表现。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jun 10;111(23):8410-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111. Epub 2014 May 12.
5
The Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS): a new instrument to characterize university STEM classroom practices.本科理工科课堂观察协议(COPUS):一种描述大学理工科课堂教学实践的新工具。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2013 Winter;12(4):618-27. doi: 10.1187/cbe.13-08-0154.
6
Professional development. Summer institute to improve university science teaching.专业发展。提高大学科学教学水平的暑期研习班。
Science. 2009 Apr 24;324(5926):470-1. doi: 10.1126/science.1170015.
7
Education. Scientific teaching.教育。科学教学。
Science. 2004 Apr 23;304(5670):521-2. doi: 10.1126/science.1096022.