Dr. Shah is a Forensic Psychiatry Fellow; Dr. Morris is an Assistant Professor of Clinical Psychiatry; Dr. McNiel is a Professor of Clinical Psychology; and Dr. Binder is a Professor of Psychiatry and Director, Psychiatry and the Law Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2023 Sep;51(3):421-430. doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.230053-23. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
Despite high rates of mental illness among incarcerated people in the United States, use of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) remains limited in jails and prisons. There are some published guidelines regarding the provision of mental health care, including ECT, in U.S. correctional facilities, but little attention has been paid to the use of ECT for individuals sentenced to death. This article examines ECT within the context of the death penalty, including court consideration of ECT in capital cases and historic uses of ECT to facilitate execution of people on death row. Given the unique clinical, legal, and ethics considerations in the use of ECT for people sentenced to death, the authors call for greater attention to these practices and propose general guidelines regarding the use of ECT in this population.
尽管美国被监禁人群中心理疾病发病率很高,但在监狱中使用电痉挛疗法(ECT)的情况仍然有限。有一些关于在美国惩教设施中提供精神保健的已发表指南,包括 ECT,但很少关注对被判处死刑的人使用 ECT。本文从死刑的角度探讨了 ECT,包括法院在死刑案件中对 ECT 的审议以及历史上使用 ECT 来协助执行死囚的情况。鉴于对被判处死刑的人使用 ECT 涉及独特的临床、法律和伦理问题,作者呼吁更多关注这些做法,并提出针对这一人群使用 ECT 的一般指南。