Coren Morgan A, Anderson Nathan P, Feldman Jamie A, Rachel Vaughn-Coaxum, Kolko David J, Lindhiem Oliver
University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3550 Terrace St, 15213 Pittsburgh, PA USA.
J Child Adolesc Trauma. 2023 Feb 13;16(3):589-596. doi: 10.1007/s40653-023-00519-z. eCollection 2023 Sep.
We estimated norms and percentiles for the Pediatric Emotional Distress Scale (PEDS) in order to enhance its utility as a screening tool for emotional and behavioral distress following a major. The PEDS was administered to a nationally representative sample of parents of children ages 5-12 from all 50 states ( = 1,570). Approximately 15% of the parents reported a trauma/stress in the past 12 months. Results showed good internal consistency (α = .92) and concurrent validity, with significantly higher scores for the trauma/stress subsample compared to the no trauma/stress subsample. PEDS scores were also significantly higher in younger children (age 5-6) compared to older children (7-12), pointing to the need for separate clinical cut-off scores for younger versus older children. Finally, we examined the factor structure of the PEDS with results supporting a four factor solution in the trauma/stress subsample. For screening purposes, we recommend cut-off scores of 39 (ages 5-6) and 35 (ages 7-12) which correspond to the 90 percentile.
我们估算了儿童情绪困扰量表(PEDS)的常模和百分位数,以提高其作为重大事件后情绪和行为困扰筛查工具的效用。该量表施用于来自全美50个州、年龄在5至12岁儿童的家长这一具有全国代表性的样本( = 1570)。约15%的家长报告孩子在过去12个月内经历过创伤/压力事件。结果显示该量表具有良好的内部一致性(α = 0.92)和同时效度,创伤/压力子样本的得分显著高于无创伤/压力子样本。与年龄较大的儿童(7至12岁)相比,年龄较小的儿童(5至6岁)的PEDS得分也显著更高,这表明需要为年龄较小和较大的儿童分别设定临床临界分数。最后,我们检验了PEDS的因子结构,结果支持创伤/压力子样本中的四因子解决方案。为便于筛查,我们建议临界分数为39(5至6岁)和35(7至12岁),这对应第90百分位数。