Shelan Mohamed, Anschuetz Lukas, Schubert Adrian, Bojaxhiu Beat, Aebersold Daniel M, Elicin Olgun, Giger Roland
Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Front Oncol. 2023 Aug 1;13:1132486. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1132486. eCollection 2023.
The optimal strategy to treat loco-regionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx (LSCC) remains to be defined. The goal of this single institution retrospective study was to report on oncologic outcome of advanced LSCC treated with curative intent.
Patients diagnosed and treated for stage T3-T4a LSCC between 2001 and 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Time-to-event endpoints were calculated beginning from the date of histologic diagnosis, which were analyzed with log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard models.
The cohort was divided into two subgroups: primary radiotherapy with concomitant cisplatin (CRT) (n=30, 38%) and primary surgery (n=48, 62%). Median follow-up was 56 months. Locoregional control (LRC) for the primary surgery and CRT were 95% and 50% in 5 years, respectively (p<0.01). Progression free survival (PFS) for the primary surgery and CRT were 61% and 38% in 5 years, respectively (p=0.23). The overall survival (OS) after primary surgery and CRT in 5 years were 63% vs. 65%, respectively (p=0.93). The 5-years LRC was significantly superior after surgery compared to RT for cT3 primaries (100% vs 50%, p= 0.0022). No significant differences were observed in the remaining subgroups regarding cT stage and PFS or OS.
Our series demonstrated superior LRC after primary surgery followed by risk-adapted adjuvant (C)RT compared to primary CRT in cT3 LSCC, but no significant difference in PFS or OS in locally-advanced LSCC. The optimal patient selection criteria for the ideal treatment for loco-regionally advanced LSCC still needs to be defined.
治疗局部晚期喉鳞状细胞癌(LSCC)的最佳策略仍有待确定。本单机构回顾性研究的目的是报告以治愈为目的治疗的晚期LSCC的肿瘤学结局。
对2001年至2014年间诊断并治疗的T3 - T4a期LSCC患者进行回顾性分析。从组织学诊断日期开始计算事件发生时间终点,采用对数秩检验和Cox比例风险模型进行分析。
队列分为两个亚组:同步顺铂辅助的原发放疗(CRT)组(n = 30,38%)和原发手术组(n = 48,62%)。中位随访时间为56个月。原发手术组和CRT组的5年局部区域控制率(LRC)分别为95%和50%(p < 0.01)。原发手术组和CRT组的5年无进展生存率(PFS)分别为61%和38%(p = 0.23)。原发手术组和CRT组的5年总生存率(OS)分别为63%和65%(p = 0.93)。对于cT3期原发肿瘤,手术组的5年LRC显著优于放疗组(100%对50%,p = 0.0022)。在其余亚组中,关于cT分期、PFS或OS未观察到显著差异。
我们的系列研究表明,在cT3期LSCC中,与原发CRT相比,原发手术后进行风险适应性辅助(C)RT后的LRC更佳,但在局部晚期LSCC的PFS或OS方面无显著差异。局部晚期LSCC理想治疗的最佳患者选择标准仍需确定。