• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头部后仰位的牙槽嵴窦底增高术:回顾性病例系列

Crestal sinus augmentation in a head back position: Retrospective case series.

作者信息

Zhang Yuhang, Zhang Chunyuan

机构信息

Department of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Department of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2023 Jul-Aug;27(4):428-433. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_229_22. Epub 2023 Jul 1.

DOI:10.4103/jisp.jisp_229_22
PMID:37593563
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10431223/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of Crestal Sinus Augmentation (CSA) in a head back position (CSA-HBP) for maxillary sinus mucosa elevation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We enrolled 209 patients, 246 maxillary sinuses, 348 sites in this study. Complications, maxillary sinus mucosal perforation rate and cumulative survival rate (CSR) data were collected to evaluate the clinical efficacy of CSA-HBP. Maxillary sinus mucosal elevation height (EH) and new bone height (NH) were measured by cone-beam computerized tomography and standard periapical radiographs. The implantation sites of residual bone height (RBH) ≤5 mm and RBH >5 mm were marked as Groups A ( = 81) and B ( = 267), respectively. The implantation sites of the second and third molar sites were marked as Group C ( = 134), and the remaining sites were marked as Group D ( = 214).

RESULTS

The RBH before implant placement was 6.63 ± 2.10 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.41- 6.85 mm). The mucosal EH was 4.04 ± 1.86 mm (95% CI 3.85 - 4.24 mm). The NH was 2.36 ± 1.20 mm (95% CI 3.85-4.24 mm). No other complications were found except three cases of postoperative swelling and one case of nasal blood secretions. The overall mucosal perforation rate was 1.44% (5/348, 95% CI 0.2%-2.7%) and the rate of RBH ≤ 5 mm (Group A) was 1.49% (2/134, 95% CI 0%-3.50%). The 8-year CSR was 99.71% (347/348, 95% CI 99.2%-100.0%). Mucosal EH and NH were higher in RBH ≤5 mm (Group A) than in RBH >5 mm (Group B) ( = 0.001 and = 0.001, Mann-Whitney -test). There were no significant differences in mucosal EH and perforation rate between second and third molar sites (Group C) and other sites (Group D) ( = 0.77, Mann-Whitney -test, and = 0.16, Yates' Chi-square independence test).

CONCLUSIONS

CSA-HBP is a minimally invasive and reliable technique.

摘要

目的

评估头后仰位嵴顶窦底提升术(CSA-HBP)在上颌窦黏膜提升中的临床疗效。

材料与方法

本研究纳入209例患者、246个上颌窦、348个位点。收集并发症、上颌窦黏膜穿孔率和累积生存率(CSR)数据以评估CSA-HBP的临床疗效。通过锥形束计算机断层扫描和标准根尖片测量上颌窦黏膜提升高度(EH)和新骨高度(NH)。残余骨高度(RBH)≤5mm和RBH>5mm的种植位点分别标记为A组(n = 81)和B组(n = 267)。第二和第三磨牙位点的种植位点标记为C组(n = 134),其余位点标记为D组(n = 214)。

结果

种植前RBH为6.63±2.10mm(95%置信区间[CI]6.41 - 6.85mm)。黏膜EH为4.04±1.86mm(95%CI 3.85 - 4.24mm)。NH为2.36±1.20mm(95%CI 3.85 - 4.24mm)。除3例术后肿胀和1例鼻分泌物带血外,未发现其他并发症。总体黏膜穿孔率为1.44%(5/348,95%CI 0.2% - 2.7%),RBH≤5mm(A组)的穿孔率为1.49%(2/134,95%CI 0% - 3.50%)。8年CSR为99.71%(347/348,95%CI 99.2% - 100.0%)。RBH≤5mm(A组)的黏膜EH和NH高于RBH>5mm(B组)(P = 0.001和P = 0.001,Mann-Whitney U检验)。第二和第三磨牙位点(C组)与其他位点(D组)之间的黏膜EH和穿孔率无显著差异(P = 0.77,Mann-Whitney U检验,P = 0.16,Yates卡方独立性检验)。

结论

CSA-HBP是一种微创且可靠的技术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbec/10431223/f83de0d47fe4/JISP-27-428-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbec/10431223/fb4e81e73ad6/JISP-27-428-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbec/10431223/de8bd1dcc290/JISP-27-428-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbec/10431223/40c9674bd1b5/JISP-27-428-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbec/10431223/0575979a02db/JISP-27-428-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbec/10431223/f83de0d47fe4/JISP-27-428-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbec/10431223/fb4e81e73ad6/JISP-27-428-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbec/10431223/de8bd1dcc290/JISP-27-428-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbec/10431223/40c9674bd1b5/JISP-27-428-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbec/10431223/0575979a02db/JISP-27-428-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbec/10431223/f83de0d47fe4/JISP-27-428-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Crestal sinus augmentation in a head back position: Retrospective case series.头部后仰位的牙槽嵴窦底增高术:回顾性病例系列
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2023 Jul-Aug;27(4):428-433. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_229_22. Epub 2023 Jul 1.
2
The effect of residual bone height and membrane thickness on sinus membrane perforation in crestal sinus grafting: A prospective clinical study.在颊侧窦底提升术中,剩余骨高度和骨膜厚度对窦膜穿孔的影响:一项前瞻性临床研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Feb;50(2):251-257. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.05.018. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
3
Factors influencing long-term survival rates of implants placed simultaneously with lateral maxillary sinus floor augmentation: A 6- to 20-year retrospective study.影响同期上颌窦侧壁提升植骨后种植体长期存活率的因素:一项 6 至 20 年回顾性研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019 Oct;30(10):977-988. doi: 10.1111/clr.13505. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
4
Effect of staged crestal maxillary sinus augmentation: A case series.分期式牙槽嵴顶上颌窦提升术的效果:一项病例系列研究。
J Periodontol. 2020 Feb;91(2):194-201. doi: 10.1002/JPER.18-0632. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
5
[Analysis on the influencing factors of long-term survival of implants during lateral maxillary sinus floor elevation].[上颌窦外侧壁提升术中种植体长期存留影响因素分析]
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2020 Oct;29(5):539-543.
6
[Retrospective study on transcrestal sinus floor elevation with simultaneous implantation of short implants].经牙槽嵴顶入路上颌窦底提升同期植入短种植体的回顾性研究
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Dec 1;38(6):667-671. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2020.06.011.
7
[Radiography study on osteotome sinus floor elevation with placed implant simultaneously with no graft augmentation].[不进行植骨增量同期植入种植体的骨凿上颌窦底提升术的影像学研究]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2020 Dec 24;53(1):95-101. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.01.015.
8
[Maxillary sinus floor augmentation using the transalveolar technique with simultaneous placement of dental implants: a 5-year clinical retrospective study].[采用经牙槽嵴技术同期植入牙种植体的上颌窦底提升术:一项5年临床回顾性研究]
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2014 Mar;49(3):161-5.
9
What Is the Most Effective Rehabilitation Method for Posterior Maxillas With 4 to 8 mm of Residual Alveolar Bone Height Below the Maxillary Sinus With Implant-Supported Prostheses? A Frequentist Network Meta-Analysis.对于上颌窦下方剩余牙槽骨高度为4至8毫米的后牙区,采用种植支持式修复体时,最有效的修复方法是什么?一项频率学派网状Meta分析。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jan;77(1):70.e1-70.e33. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2018.08.009. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
10
Osseodensified Crestal Sinus Window Augmentation: An Alternative Procedure to the Lateral Window Technique.骨强化牙槽嵴顶窦底提升术:侧向开窗技术的替代方法。
J Oral Implantol. 2021 Feb 1;47(1):45-55. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-19-00288.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical outcome and factors determining new bone formation in lateral sinus membrane elevation with simultaneous implant placement without grafting material: A cross-sectional, 3-17 year follow-up study.临床结果及影响同期种植体植入术中不使用植骨材料的外侧窦膜提升后新骨形成的因素:一项横断面、3-17 年随访研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Oct;21(5):827-834. doi: 10.1111/cid.12758. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
2
Errors of Upright Perception in Patients With Vestibular Migraine.前庭性偏头痛患者的直立感知误差
Front Neurol. 2018 Oct 30;9:892. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00892. eCollection 2018.
3
Lateral sinus floor elevation without grafting materials. Individual- and aggregate-data meta-analysis.
不使用移植物的外侧窦底提升。个体数据和汇总数据的荟萃分析。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018 Sep;46(9):1616-1624. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.06.012. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
4
Maxillary Sinus Membrane Elevation Using a Special Drilling System and Hydraulic Pressure: A 2-Year Prospective Cohort Study.使用特殊钻孔系统和液压进行上颌窦膜提升:一项为期2年的前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018 Jul/Aug;38(4):593-599. doi: 10.11607/prd.3403.
5
Sinus Membrane Elevation by the Crestal Approach Using a Novel Drilling System.采用新型钻取系统的经嵴顶入路提升窦膜。
Implant Dent. 2017 Jun;26(3):351-356. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000570.
6
Radiological sinus lift: a new minimally invasive CT-guided procedure for maxillary sinus floor elevation in implant dentistry.放射学引导下的上颌窦提升术:种植牙领域中一种新型的微创CT引导下的上颌窦底提升手术。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Mar;27(3):341-7. doi: 10.1111/clr.12549. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
7
A simplified approach to the minimally invasive antral membrane elevation technique utilizing a viscoelastic medium for hydraulic sinus floor elevation.一种利用粘弹性介质进行水压性上颌窦底提升的微创上颌窦膜提升技术的简化方法。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Mar;19(1):97-101. doi: 10.1007/s10006-014-0473-2. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
8
A pilot-study of a minimally invasive technique to elevate the sinus floor membrane and place graft for augmentation using high hydraulic pressure: 18-month follow-up of 20 cases.微创技术提升窦底膜并用高压放置移植物进行骨增量的初步研究:20 例 18 个月随访。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013 Sep;116(3):293-300. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2013.05.014.
9
The inlay osteotome sinus augmentation technique for placing short implants simultaneously with reduced crestal bone height. A short-term follow-up.用于在牙槽嵴顶骨高度降低的同时植入短种植体的嵌体骨凿窦底提升技术。短期随访。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013 Dec;15(6):918-26. doi: 10.1111/cid.12088. Epub 2013 May 24.
10
Effect of maxillary sinus membrane perforation on vital bone formation and implant survival: a retrospective study.上颌窦黏膜穿孔对骨存活和种植体存活的影响:一项回顾性研究。
J Periodontol. 2013 Aug;84(8):1094-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.2012.120458. Epub 2012 Nov 23.