Li Xiaozhou, Zhao Guangkuo, Qiu Zeliang, Deng Xingqi, Yin Qianqian
Department of Emergency Critical Care Medicine, Zhoupu Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Health College, Shanghai 201318, China. Corresponding author: Yin Qianqian, Email:
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2023 Aug;35(8):839-843. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20230407-00253.
To investigate the prognostic value of cardiac ultrasound left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on admission in patients with septic cardiomyopathy.
A retrospective cohort study was conducted. The patients with septic cardiomyopathy hospitalized in the intensive care unit of Zhoupu Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Health College from January 2019 to March 2023 were enrolled. The general information including gender and age, LVEF on admission, severity of illness scores within 24 hours after admission [acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score], procalcitonin (PCT), cardiac biomarkers [N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), cardiac troponin T (cTnT), and MB isoenzyme of creatine kinase (CK-MB)], mitochondria related indicators [aspartate aminotransferase (AST), AST/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ratio], blood lactate (Lac), the usage of vasoactive drugs and mechanical ventilation, and the prognosis during hospitalization were collected. The differences in above clinical data between the two groups were compared. The variables with statistically significant differences in univariate analysis were incorporated into multivariate Logistic regression analysis to analyze the independent risk factors for death during hospitalization in patients with septic cardiomyopathy. Receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC curve) was drawn to evaluate the prognostic value of LVEF by echocardiography on admission in patients with septic cardiomyopathy during hospitalization.
A total of 62 patients were enrolled, including 36 males and 26 females. Thirty-nine cases died and 23 cases survived during hospitalization, and the mortality was 62.90%. Compared with the survival group, the LVEF of patients on admission was lower in the death group [0.51 (0.40, 0.57) vs. 0.56 (0.51, 0.63), P < 0.01], APACHE II score, SOFA score, Lac, NT-proBNP, CK-MB within 24 hours after admission were higher [APACHE II score: 22.18±8.38 vs. 17.39±8.22, SOFA score: 9.90±3.87 vs. 7.09±3.27, Lac (mmol/L): 5.10 (2.63, 11.50) vs. 2.00 (1.40, 5.00), NT-proBNP (μg/L): 5.24 (2.84, 11.29) vs. 2.53 (0.35, 6.63), CK-MB (U/L): 1.88 (0.21, 5.33) vs. 0.17 (0.02, 1.62), all P < 0.05], and the proportion of vasoactive drug application was higher (82.05% vs. 47.83%, P < 0.01). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that LVEF on admission was an independent risk factor for predicting the prognosis of patients with septic cardiomyopathy during hospitalization [odds ratio (OR) = 0.920, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 0.855-0.990, P = 0.025]. ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of LVEF on admission for predicting the death of patients with septic cardiomyopathy was 0.715 (95%CI was 0.585-0.845, P = 0.005). When LVEF ≤ 0.52, the sensitivity was 73.9%, and the specificity was 61.5%.
The lower cardiac ultrasound LVEF on admission, the worse the prognosis of patients with septic cardiomyopathy. The cardiac ultrasound LVEF on admission can be used as a clinical index to evaluate the severity of the condition and predict the prognosis of patients with septic cardiomyopathy.
探讨脓毒症性心肌病患者入院时心脏超声左心室射血分数(LVEF)对预后的价值。
进行一项回顾性队列研究。纳入2019年1月至2023年3月在上海健康医学院附属周浦医院重症监护病房住院的脓毒症性心肌病患者。收集患者的一般信息(包括性别和年龄)、入院时的LVEF、入院后24小时内的疾病严重程度评分[急性生理与慢性健康状况评估II(APACHE II)评分和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分]、降钙素原(PCT)、心脏生物标志物[N末端脑钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)、心肌肌钙蛋白T(cTnT)和肌酸激酶MB同工酶(CK-MB)]、线粒体相关指标[天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)、AST/丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)比值]、血乳酸(Lac)、血管活性药物和机械通气的使用情况以及住院期间的预后情况。比较两组上述临床资料的差异。将单因素分析中有统计学显著差异的变量纳入多因素Logistic回归分析,以分析脓毒症性心肌病患者住院期间死亡的独立危险因素。绘制受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线),以评估入院时超声心动图测量的LVEF对脓毒症性心肌病患者住院期间预后的价值。
共纳入62例患者,其中男性36例,女性26例。住院期间39例死亡,23例存活,死亡率为62.90%。与存活组相比,死亡组患者入院时的LVEF较低[0.51(0.40,0.57)对0.56(0.51,0.63),P<0.01],入院后24小时内的APACHE II评分、SOFA评分、Lac、NT-proBNP及CK-MB较高[APACHE II评分:22.18±8.38对17.39±8.22,SOFA评分:9.90±3.87对7.09±3.27,Lac(mmol/L):5.10(2.63,11.50)对2.00(1.40,5.00)),NT-proBNP(μg/L):5.24(2.84,11.29)对2.53(0.35,6.63),CK-MB(U/L):1.88(0.21,5.33)对0.17(0.02,1.62),均P<0.05],血管活性药物应用比例较高(82.05%对47.83%,P<0.01)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,入院时的LVEF是预测脓毒症性心肌病患者住院期间预后的独立危险因素[比值比(OR)=0.920,95%置信区间(95%CI)为0.855 - 0.99