Suppr超能文献

FIGO 分期 II-IV 期卵巢癌患者肠切除术的生存影响。

Survival impact of bowel resection in patients with FIGO stage II-IV ovarian cancer.

机构信息

Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China.

Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China.

出版信息

J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Nov;149(16):14843-14852. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05258-0. Epub 2023 Aug 19.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To compare the effect of bowel resection vs stripping on the clinical outcomes of patients with FIGO II-IV ovarian cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients with FIGO II-IV ovarian cancer who suffered from bowel involvement and underwent cytoreductive surgery between January 2014 and March 2022. Patients' survival was compared by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Four hundred and twelve patients were included. 48 patients underwent bowel resection (BR), and 364 patients underwent bowel tumor stripping (BTS). The BR group had longer operative duration, hospital stay, time to post-operative chemotherapy, and more intraoperative bleeding. The median PFS was 37 months (95% CI 12-62) in BTS compared to 25 months (95% CI 10-40) in BR among patients who achieved R0 resection (p = 0.590). Among those with R1 resection, the median PFS in BST was 23 months (95% CI 16-30) and that in BR was 15 months (95% CI 12-18, p = 0.136); moreover, a favorable median PFS was observed in BTS with residual bowel lesions (23 months, 95% CI 14-32), compared to BR (15 months, 95% CI 12-18, p = 0.144). Multivariate analysis indicated that FIGO stage, PCI, cytoreduction time and residual lesions were independent prognostic factors of PFS.

CONCLUSION

For patients with FIGO stage II-IV ovarian cancer with bowel implicated, bowel resection is necessary to achieve complete removal to improve the survival. If complete resection was judged unfeasible, cautious decision of bowel resection is required. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy might reduce the ratio of bowel resection for some with mesenteric involvement.

摘要

简介

比较肠切除术与剥离术对 FIGO II-IV 期卵巢癌患者临床结局的影响。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2014 年 1 月至 2022 年 3 月间因肠道受累而接受细胞减灭术的 FIGO II-IV 期卵巢癌患者。采用 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析和 Cox 比例风险模型比较患者的生存情况。

结果

共纳入 412 例患者。48 例患者行肠切除术(BR),364 例患者行肠肿瘤剥离术(BTS)。BR 组的手术时间、住院时间、术后化疗时间均较长,术中出血量也较多。在达到 RO 切除的患者中,BTS 组的中位 PFS 为 37 个月(95%CI 12-62),BR 组为 25 个月(95%CI 10-40)(p=0.590)。在 R1 切除的患者中,BST 组的中位 PFS 为 23 个月(95%CI 16-30),BR 组为 15 个月(95%CI 12-18,p=0.136);此外,BTS 组残留肠病变的中位 PFS 较好(23 个月,95%CI 14-32),而 BR 组为 15 个月(95%CI 12-18,p=0.144)。多因素分析表明,FIGO 分期、PCI、细胞减灭时间和残留病变是 PFS 的独立预后因素。

结论

对于伴有肠道受累的 FIGO II-IV 期卵巢癌患者,肠切除术是必要的,以达到完全切除,从而提高生存。如果判断完全切除不可行,应谨慎决定是否行肠切除术。新辅助化疗可能会降低某些肠系膜受累患者行肠切除术的比例。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验