• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受尸体模拟训练的骨科实习生与接受标准训练的骨科实习生进行的髋部骨折手术:一项初步的多中心随机对照试验。

Hip fracture surgery performed by cadaveric simulation-trained versus standard-trained orthopaedic trainees: a preliminary multicentre randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

James Hannah K, Pattison Giles T R, Griffin James, Fisher Joanne D, Griffin Damian R

机构信息

Department of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK.

Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK.

出版信息

Bone Jt Open. 2023 Aug 21;4(8):602-611. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.48.BJO-2022-0143.R1.

DOI:10.1302/2633-1462.48.BJO-2022-0143.R1
PMID:37599007
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10440190/
Abstract

AIMS

To evaluate if, for orthopaedic trainees, additional cadaveric simulation training or standard training alone yields superior radiological and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation or hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture.

METHODS

This was a preliminary, pragmatic, multicentre, parallel group randomized controlled trial in nine secondary and tertiary NHS hospitals in England. Researchers were blinded to group allocation. Overall, 40 trainees in the West Midlands were eligible: 33 agreed to take part and were randomized, five withdrew after randomization, 13 were allocated cadaveric training, and 15 were allocated standard training. The intervention was an additional two-day cadaveric simulation course. The control group received standard on-the-job training. Primary outcome was implant position on the postoperative radiograph: tip-apex distance (mm) (DHS) and leg length discrepancy (mm) (hemiarthroplasty). Secondary clinical outcomes were procedure time, length of hospital stay, acute postoperative complication rate, and 12-month mortality. Procedure-specific secondary outcomes were intraoperative radiation dose (for DHS) and postoperative blood transfusion requirement (hemiarthroplasty).

RESULTS

Eight female (29%) and 20 male trainees (71%), mean age 29.4 years, performed 317 DHS operations and 243 hemiarthroplasties during ten months of follow-up. Primary analysis was a random effect model with surgeon-level fixed effects of patient condition, patient age, and surgeon experience, with a random intercept for surgeon. Under the intention-to-treat principle, for hemiarthroplasty there was better implant position in favour of cadaveric training, measured by leg length discrepancy ≤ 10 mm (odds ratio (OR) 4.08 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17 to 14.22); p = 0.027). There were significantly fewer postoperative blood transfusions required in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty by cadaveric-trained compared to standard-trained surgeons (OR 6.00 (95% CI 1.83 to 19.69); p = 0.003). For DHS, there was no significant between-group difference in implant position as measured by tip-apex distance ≤ 25 mm (OR 6.47 (95% CI 0.97 to 43.05); p = 0.053). No between-group differences were observed for any secondary clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Trainees randomized to additional cadaveric training performed hip fracture fixation with better implant positioning and fewer postoperative blood transfusions in hemiarthroplasty. This effect, which was previously unknown, may be a consequence of the intervention. Further study is required.

摘要

目的

评估对于骨科实习生而言,额外的尸体模拟训练或仅进行标准训练,在接受动力髋螺钉(DHS)固定或半髋关节置换术治疗髋部骨折的患者中,是否能产生更优的放射学和临床结果。

方法

这是一项在英格兰9家二级和三级国民健康服务(NHS)医院进行的初步、实用、多中心、平行组随机对照试验。研究人员对分组情况不知情。总体而言,西米德兰兹郡的40名实习生符合条件:33人同意参与并被随机分组,5人在随机分组后退出,13人被分配接受尸体训练,15人被分配接受标准训练。干预措施为额外的为期两天的尸体模拟课程。对照组接受标准的在职培训。主要结局是术后X线片上的植入物位置:尖顶距离(毫米)(DHS)和肢体长度差异(毫米)(半髋关节置换术)。次要临床结局包括手术时间、住院时间、术后急性并发症发生率和12个月死亡率。特定手术的次要结局是术中辐射剂量(DHS)和术后输血需求(半髋关节置换术)。

结果

8名女性(29%)和20名男性实习生(71%),平均年龄29.4岁,在随访的10个月期间进行了317例DHS手术和243例半髋关节置换术。主要分析是一个随机效应模型,具有患者病情、患者年龄和外科医生经验的外科医生水平固定效应,以及外科医生的随机截距。在意向性分析原则下,对于半髋关节置换术,尸体训练组的植入物位置更好,以肢体长度差异≤10毫米衡量(优势比(OR)4.08(95%置信区间(CI)1.17至14.22);p = 0.027)。与接受标准训练的外科医生相比,接受尸体训练的外科医生进行半髋关节置换术的患者术后输血需求显著减少(OR 6.00(95% CI 1.83至19.69);p = 0.003)。对于DHS,以尖顶距离≤25毫米衡量,组间植入物位置无显著差异(OR 6.47(95% CI 0.97至43.05);p = 0.053)。在任何次要临床结局方面均未观察到组间差异。

结论

随机接受额外尸体训练的实习生在进行髋部骨折固定时,半髋关节置换术的植入物定位更好,术后输血更少。这种此前未知的效果可能是干预措施的结果。需要进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Hip fracture surgery performed by cadaveric simulation-trained versus standard-trained orthopaedic trainees: a preliminary multicentre randomized controlled trial.接受尸体模拟训练的骨科实习生与接受标准训练的骨科实习生进行的髋部骨折手术:一项初步的多中心随机对照试验。
Bone Jt Open. 2023 Aug 21;4(8):602-611. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.48.BJO-2022-0143.R1.
2
Ankle fracture internal fixation performed by cadaveric simulation-trained versus standard-trained orthopaedic trainees: a preliminary, multicentre randomized controlled trial.尸体模拟训练的骨科实习生与标准训练的骨科实习生进行的踝关节骨折内固定术:一项初步的多中心随机对照试验。
Bone Jt Open. 2023 Aug 17;4(8):594-601. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.48.BJO-2022-0144.R1.
3
Cadaveric simulation versus standard training for postgraduate trauma and orthopaedic surgical trainees: protocol for the CAD:TRAUMA study multicentre randomised controlled educational trial.尸体模拟与研究生创伤和骨科手术学员的标准培训对比:CAD:TRAUMA研究多中心随机对照教育试验方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 25;10(9):e037319. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037319.
4
Assessment of technical skill in hip fracture surgery using the postoperative radiograph: pilot development and validation of a final product analysis core outcome set.使用术后X线片评估髋部骨折手术的技术技能:最终产品分析核心结局集的初步开发与验证
Bone Jt Open. 2020 Sep 24;1(9):594-604. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.19.BJO-2020-0101.R1. eCollection 2020 Sep.
5
Are There Differences in Performance Among Femoral Stem Brands Utilized in Cementless Hemiarthroplasty for Treatment of Geriatric Femoral Neck Fractures?在用于治疗老年股骨颈骨折的非骨水泥半髋关节置换术中,不同品牌的股骨柄在性能上是否存在差异?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 1;483(2):253-264. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003222. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
6
Cannulated screws versus dynamic hip screw versus hemiarthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty in patients with displaced and non-displaced femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis of 5703 patients.空心螺钉与动力髋螺钉与半髋关节置换与全髋关节置换治疗移位与非移位股骨颈骨折患者:5703 例患者的系统评价和频率网络荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Aug 26;18(1):625. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04114-8.
7
Screw Fixation Versus Hemiarthroplasty for Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures in Elderly Patients: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.螺钉固定与半髋关节置换治疗老年股骨颈无移位骨折:一项多中心随机对照试验。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Jan 16;101(2):136-144. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00316.
8
Outcome of Primary Cemented Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty compared with Dynamic Hip Screw in Elderly Patients with Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture.老年不稳定型股骨转子间骨折患者中,初次骨水泥型双极半髋关节置换术与动力髋螺钉内固定术的疗效比较
Malays Orthop J. 2018 Mar;12(1):36-41. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.1803.007.
9
Laparoscopic surgical box model training for surgical trainees with no prior laparoscopic experience.针对没有腹腔镜手术经验的外科实习生的腹腔镜手术箱模型培训。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 17;2014(1):CD010479. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010479.pub2.
10
A randomized, prospective study comparing intertrochanteric hip fracture fixation with the dynamic hip screw and the dynamic helical hip system in a community practice.一项在社区实践中比较动力髋螺钉与动力螺旋髋系统治疗股骨转子间骨折固定效果的随机前瞻性研究。
Iowa Orthop J. 2011;31:166-72.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing skills and confidence in ultrasound-guided injection techniques: the impact of a cadaveric workshop.提升超声引导注射技术的技能与信心:尸体解剖工作坊的影响
BMC Med Educ. 2025 May 12;25(1):696. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07270-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk factors for dislocation after primary total hip replacement: meta-analysis of 125 studies involving approximately five million hip replacements.初次全髋关节置换术后脱位的危险因素:对125项涉及约500万例髋关节置换术的研究进行的荟萃分析。
Lancet Rheumatol. 2019 Oct;1(2):e111-e121. doi: 10.1016/s2665-9913(19)30045-1.
2
Assessment of technical skill in hip fracture surgery using the postoperative radiograph: pilot development and validation of a final product analysis core outcome set.使用术后X线片评估髋部骨折手术的技术技能:最终产品分析核心结局集的初步开发与验证
Bone Jt Open. 2020 Sep 24;1(9):594-604. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.19.BJO-2020-0101.R1. eCollection 2020 Sep.
3
Cadaveric simulation versus standard training for postgraduate trauma and orthopaedic surgical trainees: protocol for the CAD:TRAUMA study multicentre randomised controlled educational trial.
尸体模拟与研究生创伤和骨科手术学员的标准培训对比:CAD:TRAUMA研究多中心随机对照教育试验方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 25;10(9):e037319. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037319.
4
How Does Cadaveric Simulation Influence Learning in Orthopedic Residents?尸体模拟如何影响骨科住院医师的学习?
J Surg Educ. 2020 May-Jun;77(3):671-682. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.12.006. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
5
Systematic review of the current status of cadaveric simulation for surgical training.尸体模拟在外科培训中的应用现状的系统综述。
Br J Surg. 2019 Dec;106(13):1726-1734. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11325. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
6
Hip-fracture osteosynthesis training: exploring learning curves and setting proficiency standards.髋部骨折内固定术培训:探索学习曲线并制定熟练标准。
Acta Orthop. 2019 Aug;90(4):348-353. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1607111. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
7
Integrated risk scoring model for predicting dynamic hip screw treatment outcome of intertrochanteric fracture.预测股骨转子间骨折动力髋螺钉治疗效果的综合风险评分模型
Injury. 2016 Nov;47(11):2501-2506. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.09.012. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
8
Grading of Surgeon Technical Performance Predicts Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula for Pancreaticoduodenectomy Independent of Patient-related Variables.外科医生技术表现分级独立于患者相关变量预测胰十二指肠切除术后胰瘘。
Ann Surg. 2016 Sep;264(3):482-91. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001862.
9
Postoperative radiograph of the hip arthroplasty: what the radiologist should know.髋关节置换术后的X线片:放射科医生应了解的内容。
Insights Imaging. 2015 Dec;6(6):591-600. doi: 10.1007/s13244-015-0438-5. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
10
Learning curve of acetabular cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty using a cumulative summation test for learning curve (LC-CUSUM).使用学习曲线累积和检验(LC-CUSUM)评估全髋关节置换术中髋臼杯定位的学习曲线
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Mar;29(3):586-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.07.023. Epub 2013 Aug 30.