• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于日本膝关节骨关节炎和腰椎椎管狭窄症的在线患者资源的可读性和质量。

Readability and quality of online patient resources regarding knee osteoarthritis and lumbar spinal stenosis in Japan.

机构信息

Graduate School of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.

Graduate School of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan; Graduate School of Global and Transdisciplinary Studies, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.

出版信息

J Orthop Sci. 2024 Sep;29(5):1313-1318. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2023.08.003. Epub 2023 Aug 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.jos.2023.08.003
PMID:37599135
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to quantify the readability and quality of online patient resources on knee osteoarthritis and lumbar spinal stenosis in Japan.

METHODS

Three search engines (Google, Yahoo, and Bing) were searched for the terms knee osteoarthritis and lumbar spinal stenosis. The first 30 websites of each search were screened. Duplicate websites and those unrelated to the searched diseases were excluded. The remaining 125 websites (62 on knee osteoarthritis, 63 on lumbar spinal stenosis) were analyzed. The text readability was assessed using two web-based programs (Obi-3 and Readability Research Lab) and lexical density. Website quality was evaluated using the DISCERN score, Clear Communication Index, and Journal of American Medical Association benchmark criteria.

RESULTS

Readability scores were high, indicating that the texts were difficult to understand. Only 24 (19%) and six (5%) websites were classified as average difficulty readability according to Obi-3 and Readability Research Lab, respectively. The overall quality of information was low, with only four (3%) being rated as having sufficient quality based on the Clear Communication Index and Journal of American Medical Association benchmark criteria. None of the websites satisfied the DISCERN quality criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient information on Japanese websites regarding knee osteoarthritis and lumbar spinal stenosis were difficult to understand. Moreover, the quality of the websites was insufficient. Orthopaedic surgeons should contribute to the creation of high-quality easy-to-read websites to facilitate patient-physician communication.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在量化日本膝关节骨关节炎和腰椎椎管狭窄症在线患者资源的可读性和质量。

方法

在三个搜索引擎(谷歌、雅虎和必应)中搜索“膝关节骨关节炎”和“腰椎椎管狭窄症”。筛选每个搜索引擎的前 30 个网站。排除重复网站和与搜索疾病无关的网站。分析剩余的 125 个网站(膝关节骨关节炎 62 个,腰椎椎管狭窄症 63 个)。使用两个网络程序(Obi-3 和 Readability Research Lab)和词汇密度评估文本的可读性。使用 DISCERN 评分、清晰沟通指数和美国医学会基准标准评估网站质量。

结果

可读性评分较高,表明文本难以理解。根据 Obi-3 和 Readability Research Lab,只有 24 个(19%)和 6 个(5%)网站分别被归类为中等难度可读性。信息的整体质量较低,只有 4 个(3%)根据清晰沟通指数和美国医学会基准标准被评为具有足够质量。没有一个网站符合 DISCERN 质量标准。

结论

日本网站上关于膝关节骨关节炎和腰椎椎管狭窄症的患者信息难以理解。此外,网站的质量也不足。骨科医生应该为创建高质量的易读网站做出贡献,以促进医患沟通。

相似文献

1
Readability and quality of online patient resources regarding knee osteoarthritis and lumbar spinal stenosis in Japan.关于日本膝关节骨关节炎和腰椎椎管狭窄症的在线患者资源的可读性和质量。
J Orthop Sci. 2024 Sep;29(5):1313-1318. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2023.08.003. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
2
Readability and quality of online patient materials in the websites of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association and related orthopaedic societies.日本骨科协会及相关骨科协会网站上在线患者资料的可读性与质量。
J Orthop Sci. 2023 Jul;28(4):901-906. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2022.05.003. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
3
Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.评估失败性脊柱手术后在线资源的质量、内容和可读性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Apr 1;44(7):494-502. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002870.
4
Analysis of Readability, Quality, and Content of Online Information Available for "Stem Cell" Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis.在线可获取的“干细胞”膝关节骨关节炎注射信息的可读性、质量和内容分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Mar;35(3):647-651.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.10.013. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
5
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)操作:在线信息质量和可读性的评估。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 May 5;21(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01513-x.
6
Critical analysis of the quality of internet resources for patients with varicose veins.静脉曲张患者互联网资源质量的批判性分析。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021 Jul;9(4):1017-1024.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.12.072. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
7
Assessment of the quality and variability of health information on chronic pain websites using the DISCERN instrument.使用 DISCERN 工具评估慢性疼痛网站上健康信息的质量和变异性。
BMC Med. 2010 Oct 12;8:59. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-59.
8
Osteotomy around the knee: Assessment of quality, content and readability of online information.膝关节周围截骨术:在线信息的质量、内容及可读性评估
Knee. 2021 Jan;28:139-150. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.11.010. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
9
Critical Analysis of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Aspects of Online Information Provided for Neck-Lifts.对颈部提升术在线信息的质量、可读性及技术方面的批判性分析
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2017 Mar 1;19(2):115-120. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2016.1219.
10
Information on the Internet about clear aligner treatment-an assessment of content, quality, and readability.互联网上有关透明牙套治疗的信息——对内容、质量和可读性的评估。
J Orofac Orthop. 2022 Oct;83(Suppl 1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s00056-021-00331-0. Epub 2021 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality Assessment of Medical Institutions' Websites Regarding Prescription Drug Misuse of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists by Off-Label Use for Weight Loss: Website Evaluation Study.医疗机构网站关于胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂用于减肥的非标签使用导致处方药滥用的质量评估:网站评估研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 1;9:e68792. doi: 10.2196/68792.
2
A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Readability of Online Information Regarding Hip Osteoarthritis.关于髋骨关节炎在线信息可读性的横断面分析。
Cureus. 2024 May 18;16(5):e60536. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60536. eCollection 2024 May.