• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单次经皮机械血栓切除术治疗急性和亚急性深静脉血栓形成:临床结果及复发的预测因素

Single-Session Percutaneous Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute and Subacute Deep Vein Thrombosis: Clinical Outcomes and Predictive Factors of Recurrence.

作者信息

Lee Sangjoon, Cho Youngjong, Lee Hyoung Nam, Park Sung-Joon, Chung Hwan Hoon, Park Hyerim

机构信息

Vascular Center, The Eutteum Orthopedic Surgery Hospital, Paju-si, Republic of Korea.

Department of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung Asan Hospital, Gangneung-si, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Belg Soc Radiol. 2023 Aug 16;107(1):60. doi: 10.5334/jbsr.3213. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.5334/jbsr.3213
PMID:37600563
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10437142/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of single-session percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) for deep vein thrombosis (DVT), to compare clinical outcomes and recurrences between acute and subacute DVT, and to identify factors predicting recurrence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2018 to March 2021, 100 consecutive patients (age: 64.64 ± 17.28 years; male, 42%) with symptomatic DVT who underwent single-session PMT were enrolled for this study. These patients were divided into an acute DVT group (< 14 days, = 75) and a subacute DVT group (15-28 days, = 25).

RESULTS

A large-bore aspiration thrombectomy was used in 80 (80%) cases, Angiojet (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) device in one (1%) case, and a combination of both techniques in 19 (19%) cases. The anatomic success rate was 97% and the clinical success rate was 95%. There were no major complications. Clinical outcomes were not different between the two groups. The recurrence-free survival rate in the acute DVT group was significantly ( = 0.015) better than that in the subacute DVT group. The anatomic success (HR, 52.3; 95% CI, 3.82-715.21; = 0.003) and symptom duration (HR, 17.58; 95% CI, 1.89-163.34; = 0.012) were predictive factors associated with recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-session PMT is safe and effective for immediate symptom relief in acute and subacute DVT patients. However, recurrence occurred more frequently in patients with subacute DVT than in those with acute DVT. Anatomic success of the procedure and duration of symptoms were independent predictors of DVT recurrence.

摘要

目的

评估单次经皮机械血栓切除术(PMT)治疗深静脉血栓形成(DVT)的有效性和安全性,比较急性和亚急性DVT的临床结局和复发情况,并确定预测复发的因素。

材料与方法

2018年1月至2021年3月,100例连续接受单次PMT治疗的有症状DVT患者(年龄:64.64±17.28岁;男性,42%)纳入本研究。这些患者分为急性DVT组(<14天,n = 75)和亚急性DVT组(15 - 28天,n = 25)。

结果

80例(80%)采用大口径抽吸血栓切除术,1例(1%)采用Angiojet(美国波士顿科学公司,马尔伯勒,马萨诸塞州)装置,19例(19%)采用两种技术联合使用。解剖成功率为97%,临床成功率为95%。无重大并发症。两组临床结局无差异。急性DVT组的无复发生存率显著优于亚急性DVT组(P = 0.015)。解剖成功(HR,52.3;95%CI,3.82 - 715.21;P = 0.003)和症状持续时间(HR,17.58;95%CI,1.89 - 163.34;P = 0.012)是与复发相关的预测因素。

结论

单次PMT对急性和亚急性DVT患者立即缓解症状是安全有效的。然而,亚急性DVT患者的复发比急性DVT患者更频繁。手术的解剖成功和症状持续时间是DVT复发的独立预测因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e13/10437142/51c74bd71d24/jbsr-107-1-3213-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e13/10437142/4487e5d8f0f3/jbsr-107-1-3213-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e13/10437142/51c74bd71d24/jbsr-107-1-3213-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e13/10437142/4487e5d8f0f3/jbsr-107-1-3213-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e13/10437142/51c74bd71d24/jbsr-107-1-3213-g2.jpg

相似文献

1
Single-Session Percutaneous Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute and Subacute Deep Vein Thrombosis: Clinical Outcomes and Predictive Factors of Recurrence.单次经皮机械血栓切除术治疗急性和亚急性深静脉血栓形成:临床结果及复发的预测因素
J Belg Soc Radiol. 2023 Aug 16;107(1):60. doi: 10.5334/jbsr.3213. eCollection 2023.
2
Single-session aspiration thrombectomy of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis using large-size catheter without pharmacologic thrombolysis.使用大尺寸导管进行单次下肢深静脉血栓抽吸清除术,不进行药物溶栓。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014 Apr;37(2):412-9. doi: 10.1007/s00270-013-0676-1. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
3
Aspiration thrombectomy for acute iliofemoral or central deep venous thrombosis.急性髂股或中央型深静脉血栓形成的抽吸血栓切除术。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2019 Mar;7(2):162-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2018.09.015. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
4
Single-Session Endovascular Treatment of Symptomatic Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis: Is it Possible Even for Aged Thrombosis.症状性下肢深静脉血栓形成的单期血管内治疗:老年血栓患者是否也可行?
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2016 Jul;50(5):321-7. doi: 10.1177/1538574416652241. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
5
Single-session endovascular treatment for symptomatic lower extremity deep vein thrombosis: a feasibility study.症状性下肢深静脉血栓形成的单期血管内治疗:一项可行性研究。
Acta Radiol. 2010 Apr;51(3):248-55. doi: 10.3109/02841850903536078.
6
Meta-analysis and systematic review of percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy for lower extremity deep vein thrombosis.经皮机械血栓切除术治疗下肢深静脉血栓形成的荟萃分析和系统评价。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2018 Nov;6(6):788-800. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2018.08.002.
7
Percutaneous manual aspiration thrombectomy followed by stenting for iliac vein compression syndrome with secondary acute isolated iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis: a prospective study of single-session endovascular protocol.经皮手动抽吸血栓切除术联合支架置入治疗髂静脉压迫综合征合并继发性急性孤立性髂股深静脉血栓形成:单次血管内治疗方案的前瞻性研究。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014 Jan;47(1):68-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.09.030. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
8
Pharmacomechanical thrombectomy for iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis: an alternative in patients with contraindications to thrombolysis.髂股深静脉血栓形成的药物机械性血栓切除术:溶栓禁忌患者的一种替代治疗方法。
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Nov;50(5):1092-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.06.050. Epub 2009 Sep 26.
9
Pharmacomechanical thrombolysis of symptomatic acute and subacute deep vein thrombosis with a rotational thrombectomy device.使用旋转血栓切除术装置对有症状的急性和亚急性深静脉血栓形成进行药物机械性溶栓治疗。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014 Dec;25(12):1895-900. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2014.08.018. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
10
Catheter-direct thrombolysis versus pharmacomechanical thrombectomy for treatment of symptomatic lower extremity deep venous thrombosis.导管直接溶栓与药物机械性血栓切除术治疗有症状的下肢深静脉血栓形成
Am J Surg. 2006 Dec;192(6):782-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.08.045.

本文引用的文献

1
Single-Session Treatment of Patients with Symptomatic Iliocaval and Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis: Technical Results of a Prospective Pilot Study.单次治疗有症状的髂股深静脉血栓形成患者:一项前瞻性试点研究的技术结果。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2022 Feb;33(2):183-188. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2021.10.011. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
2
Clinical Outcomes of a Pharmacomechanical Catheter-Directed Venous Thrombolysis Strategy that Included Rheolytic Thrombectomy in a Multicenter Randomized Trial.多中心随机试验中包含旋切血栓切除术的药物机械性导管直接溶栓策略的临床转归。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2021 Sep;32(9):1296-1309.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2021.06.001. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
3
Society of Interventional Radiology Clinical Practice Guideline for Inferior Vena Cava Filters in the Treatment of Patients with Venous Thromboembolic Disease: Developed in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology, American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma, American Heart Association, Society for Vascular Surgery, and Society for Vascular Medicine.
介入放射学会关于下腔静脉滤器治疗静脉血栓栓塞性疾病患者的临床实践指南:与美国心脏病学会、美国胸科医师学会、美国外科医师学会创伤委员会、美国心脏协会、血管外科学会和血管医学学会合作制定。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020 Oct;31(10):1529-1544. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2020.06.014. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
4
Comparison of catheter-directed thrombolysis with and without percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy for subacute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis.比较导管溶栓联合与不联合经皮机械血栓切除术治疗亚急性髂股腘静脉血栓形成。
Phlebology. 2020 Sep;35(8):589-596. doi: 10.1177/0268355520919201. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
5
Ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis versus anticoagulation for the prevention of post-thrombotic syndrome (CAVA): a single-blind, multicentre, randomised trial.超声加速导管直接溶栓与抗凝预防血栓形成后综合征(CAVA):一项单盲、多中心、随机试验
Lancet Haematol. 2020 Jan;7(1):e40-e49. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30209-1. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
6
The Efficacy and Safety of AngioJet Rheolytic Thrombectomy in the Treatment of Subacute Deep Venous Thrombosis in Lower Extremity.AngioJet 机械血栓清除术治疗下肢亚急性深静脉血栓形成的疗效与安全性
Ann Vasc Surg. 2019 Jul;58:295-301. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.11.017. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
7
Pharmacomechanical Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Deep-Vein Thrombosis.药物机械性导管定向溶栓治疗深静脉血栓形成
N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 7;377(23):2240-2252. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1615066.
8
Proposal of a New Adverse Event Classification by the Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee.介入放射学会实践标准委员会提出的新不良事件分类法
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017 Oct;28(10):1432-1437.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.06.019. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
9
Single-Session Endovascular Treatment of Symptomatic Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis: Is it Possible Even for Aged Thrombosis.症状性下肢深静脉血栓形成的单期血管内治疗:老年血栓患者是否也可行?
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2016 Jul;50(5):321-7. doi: 10.1177/1538574416652241. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
10
Pharmacomechanical thrombolysis of symptomatic acute and subacute deep vein thrombosis with a rotational thrombectomy device.使用旋转血栓切除术装置对有症状的急性和亚急性深静脉血栓形成进行药物机械性溶栓治疗。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014 Dec;25(12):1895-900. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2014.08.018. Epub 2014 Oct 2.