Zhou Hu, Zhou Jianfeng, Wu Depei, Ma Liping, Du Xin, Niu Ting, Yang Renchi, Liu Jing, Zhang Feng, Shi Qingzhi, Wang Xiuli, Jing Hongmei, Li Junmin, Wang Xin, Cui Zhongguang, Zhou Zeping, Hou Ming, Shao Zonghong, Jin Jie, Li Wenqian, Ren Hanyun, Hu Jianda, Shen Jianliang, Liu Li, Zeng Yun, Zhou Jin, Liu Xin, Shen Yunfeng, Ding Kai, Taira Tadaaki, Cai Huacong, Zhao Yongqiang
Henan Cancer Hospital/The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhenzhou, China.
Tongji Hospital affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, China.
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2023 May 23;7(5):100192. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2023.100192. eCollection 2023 Jul.
Multiple trials have confirmed that romiplostim could increase platelet count in individuals with primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), but no related study has assessed Chinese patients.
To assess the effectiveness of romiplostim as a second-line treatment of persistent or chronic ITP in Chinese adults.
This phase III multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, then open-label clinical trial (NCT02868099, CTR20150395) was conducted at 28 investigational sites in China. The patients were randomly assigned (3:1) to romiplostim (starting and maximum doses of 1 and 10 μg/kg, respectively) or placebo for 9 weeks (double-blind period), followed by the open-label period (both groups administered romiplostim) to week 22. The primary endpoint was the time (in weeks) during which platelet counts were ≥50 × 10/L in the double-blind period.
In this study, 202 patients (romiplostim, = 151; placebo, = 51) started the treatment. The median (range) numbers of weeks with platelet response after 6 weeks of treatment were 2 (0-6) and 0 (0-2) in patients administered romiplostim and placebo, respectively ( .001). During the double-blind period, the proportions of patients with treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable between the romiplostim and placebo groups (82.8% vs 82.4%). The treatment-emergent adverse event with ≥10% difference in incidence between these 2 groups was injection site bleeding (1.3% vs 11.8%).
Romiplostim significantly increased the time with maintained platelet response in patients with persistent or chronic ITP in comparison with placebo. No new safety signal was observed.
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02868099. www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/clinicaltrials.searchlist.dhtml, CTR20150395.
多项试验已证实,罗米司亭可增加原发性免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)患者的血小板计数,但尚无相关研究评估中国患者的情况。
评估罗米司亭作为中国成年持续性或慢性ITP二线治疗药物的有效性。
本III期多中心、随机、安慰剂对照、双盲、随后开放标签的临床试验(NCT02868099,CTR20150395)在中国28个研究地点进行。患者被随机分配(3:1)接受罗米司亭(起始剂量和最大剂量分别为1和10μg/kg)或安慰剂治疗9周(双盲期),随后进入开放标签期(两组均给予罗米司亭)至第22周。主要终点是双盲期血小板计数≥50×10⁹/L的时间(以周为单位)。
本研究中,202例患者(罗米司亭组,n = 151;安慰剂组,n = 51)开始治疗。接受罗米司亭和安慰剂治疗的患者在治疗6周后血小板反应的中位(范围)周数分别为2(0 - 6)和0(0 - 2)(P <.001)。在双盲期,罗米司亭组和安慰剂组出现治疗中出现的不良事件的患者比例相当(82.8%对82.4%)。这两组之间发生率差异≥10%的治疗中出现的不良事件是注射部位出血(1.3%对11.8%)。
与安慰剂相比,罗米司亭显著增加了持续性或慢性ITP患者血小板反应维持的时间。未观察到新的安全信号。
ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT02868099。www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/clinicaltrials.searchlist.dhtml,CTR20150395。