Comment on "Sutured Versus Mesh-Augmented Hiatus Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials" by Petric J, Bright T, Liu DS, et al. . 2022;275:e45-e51.
作者信息
Gutschow Christian A
机构信息
From the Department of Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
出版信息
Ann Surg Open. 2022 Sep 7;3(3):e201. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000201. eCollection 2022 Sep.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Comment on "Sutured Versus Mesh-Augmented Hiatus Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials" by Petric J, Bright T, Liu DS, et al. . 2022;275:e45-e51.对Petric J、Bright T、Liu DS等人所著的《缝合与补片增强型食管裂孔疝修补术：随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析》的评论。2022年；275:e45 - e51。
Ann Surg Open. 2022 Sep 7;3(3):e201. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000201. eCollection 2022 Sep.
2
Comment on "Sutured Versus Mesh-augmented Hiatus Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials".对《缝合与补片强化食管裂孔疝修补术：随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析》的评论
Ann Surg Open. 2022 Jun 17;3(3):e173. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000173. eCollection 2022 Sep.
3
What works best in hiatus hernia repair, sutures alone, absorbable mesh or non-absorbable mesh? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.在食管裂孔疝修补术中，缝线单独使用、可吸收网片或不可吸收网片哪种效果最好？一项随机临床试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2023 Jul 3;36(7). doi: 10.1093/dote/doac101.
4
Lower Risk of Recurrence After Mesh Repair Versus Non-Mesh Sutured Repair in Open Umbilical Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.网片修补与非网片缝合修补在开放性脐疝修补术中的复发风险较低：一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Scand J Surg. 2019 Sep;108(3):187-193. doi: 10.1177/1457496918812208. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
5
Re: Li J, Ji Z, Li Y. The Comparison of Self-gripping Mesh and Sutured Mesh in Open Inguinal Hernia Repair. The Results of Meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2014;259:1080--1085.回复：李J、季Z、李Y。开放腹股沟疝修补术中自固定补片与缝合补片的比较。荟萃分析结果。《外科学年鉴》。2014年；259:1080 - 1085。
Ann Surg. 2016 Feb;263(2):e30-1. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001137.
6
Prophylactic Mesh Reinforcement versus Sutured Closure to Prevent Incisional Hernias after Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair via Midline Laparotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.剖腹开放式腹主动脉瘤修复术后应用预防性网片加强与缝线缝合预防切口疝的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Jul;56(1):120-128. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.03.021. Epub 2018 Apr 22.
7
Self-gripping versus sutured mesh for inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current literature.自固定补片与缝合补片在腹股沟疝修补术中的应用：当前文献的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Surg Res. 2013 Dec;185(2):653-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.07.035. Epub 2013 Aug 11.
8
Laparoscopic repair of very large hiatus hernia with sutures versus absorbable mesh versus nonabsorbable mesh: a randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜修补超大裂孔疝：缝线修补与可吸收补片修补及不可吸收补片修补的随机对照试验。
Ann Surg. 2015 Feb;261(2):282-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000842.
9
Self-gripping mesh versus sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: system review and meta-analysis.开放式腹股沟疝修补术中自固定网片与缝合网片的比较：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Surg. 2014 May;207(5):773-81. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.08.045. Epub 2014 Jan 4.
10
Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic mesh versus suture repair of hiatus hernia: objective and subjective outcomes.腹腔镜网片与缝合修复食管裂孔疝的系统评价和荟萃分析：客观和主观结果。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec;31(12):4913-4922. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5586-x. Epub 2017 May 18.
引用本文的文献
1
Hiatus hernia repair with a new-generation biosynthetic mesh: a 4-year single-center experience.新一代生物合成补片修补食管裂孔疝：4 年单中心经验。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jul;37(7):5295-5302. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10005-0. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
本文引用的文献
1
Large hiatus hernia: time for a paradigm shift?巨大食管裂孔疝：是否到了范式转变的时候？
BMC Surg. 2022 Jul 8;22(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01705-w.
2
Anatomic location and mechanism of hiatal hernia recurrence: a video-based assessment.食管裂孔疝复发的解剖位置和机制：基于视频的评估。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jul;36(7):5451-5455. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08887-z. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
3
Sutured Versus Mesh-augmented Hiatus Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.缝合与网片增强膈疝修补术的比较：一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2022 Jan 1;275(1):e45-e51. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004902.
4
Tension-free mesh versus suture-alone cruroplasty in antireflux surgery: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial.无张力网片与单纯缝合抗反流手术：一项随机、双盲临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2020 Dec;107(13):1731-1740. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11917. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
5
Five Year Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Laparoscopic Repair of Very Large Hiatus Hernia With Sutures Versus Absorbable Versus Nonabsorbable Mesh.腹腔镜修补超大裂孔疝缝线与可吸收与不可吸收网片随机对照试验的 5 年随访结果。
Ann Surg. 2020 Aug;272(2):241-247. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003734.
6
Evolution From the U-shaped to Keyhole-shaped Mesh Configuration in the Repair of Paraesophageal and Recurrent Hiatal Hernia.从 U 形到钥匙孔形补片构型在食管旁和复发性食管裂孔疝修补术中的演变。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2020 Aug;30(4):339-344. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000790.
7
Anatomic Observation of Recurrent Hiatal Hernia: Recurrence or Disease Progression?解剖学观察复发性食管裂孔疝：复发还是疾病进展？
J Am Coll Surg. 2020 Jun;230(6):999-1007. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.03.011. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
8
Mesh erosion after hiatal hernia repair: the tip of the iceberg?食管裂孔疝修补术后网片侵蚀：冰山一角？
Hernia. 2019 Dec;23(6):1243-1252. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02011-w. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
9
Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair using sutures versus sutures reinforced with non-absorbable mesh.随机对照临床试验比较腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术采用缝线与缝线加固不可吸收网。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Nov;32(11):4579-4589. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6211-3. Epub 2018 May 15.
10
Laparoscopic management of large hiatal hernia: mesh method with the use of ProGrip mesh versus standard crural repair.腹腔镜治疗巨大食管裂孔疝：使用 ProGrip 网片的网片方法与标准裂孔修补术的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Aug;32(8):3592-3598. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6087-2. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
Zotero 插件