Luan Anna, Meyers Natalie, Le Thua Trung Hau, Dang Hoang Thom, Phu Quoc Viet, Auten Brieanne, Chang James
From the Department of Surgery, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Division, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
ReSurge International, Sunnyvale, CA.
Ann Surg Open. 2022 Aug 10;3(3):e181. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000181. eCollection 2022 Sep.
The objective of this study was to quantify the cost-effectiveness and economic value of a reconstructive surgery visiting educator trip program in a resource-constrained setting.
Reconstructive surgical capacity remains inadequate in low- and middle-income countries, resulting in chronic disability and a significant economic toll. Education and training of the local surgical workforce to sustainably expand capacity have been increasingly encouraged, but economic analyses of these interventions are lacking.
Data were analyzed from 12 visiting educator trips and independently-performed surgical procedures at 3 Vietnamese hospitals between 2014 and 2019. A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using standardized methodology and thresholds to determine cost-effectiveness. Sensitivity analyses were performed with disability weights, discounting, and costs from different perspectives. Economic benefit was estimated using both the human capital method and the value of a statistical life method, and a benefit-cost ratio was computed.
In the base case analysis, the visiting educator program was very cost-effective at $581 per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted. Economic benefit was between $21·6 million and $29·3 million, corresponding to a 12- to 16-fold return on investment. Furthermore, when considering only costs to the organization, the cost decreased to $61 per DALY averted, with a 113- to 153-fold return on investment for the organization.
Visiting educator programs, which build local reconstructive surgical capacity in limited-resource environments, can be very cost-effective with significant economic benefit and return on investment. These findings may help guide organizations, donors, and policymakers in resource allocation in global surgery.
本研究的目的是量化在资源受限环境下重建外科访问教育工作者项目的成本效益和经济价值。
低收入和中等收入国家的重建手术能力仍然不足,导致慢性残疾和巨大的经济损失。越来越鼓励对当地外科工作人员进行教育和培训以可持续地扩大手术能力,但缺乏对这些干预措施的经济分析。
分析了2014年至2019年间在3家越南医院进行的12次访问教育工作者行程和独立开展的外科手术的数据。使用标准化方法和阈值进行成本效益分析以确定成本效益。从不同角度对残疾权重、贴现和成本进行敏感性分析。使用人力资本法和统计生命价值法估计经济效益,并计算效益成本比。
在基础案例分析中,访问教育工作者项目非常具有成本效益,每避免一个伤残调整生命年(DALY)的成本为581美元。经济效益在2160万美元至2930万美元之间,对应12至16倍的投资回报率。此外,仅考虑组织的成本时,每避免一个DALY的成本降至61美元,组织的投资回报率为113至153倍。
在资源有限的环境中建立当地重建手术能力访问教育工作者项目,具有很高的成本效益,能带来显著的经济效益和投资回报。这些研究结果可能有助于指导组织、捐助者和政策制定者在全球手术中的资源分配。