文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

移植研究中的ChatGPT与人工智能:它总是正确的吗?

ChatGPT and Artificial Intelligence in Transplantation Research: Is It Always Correct?

作者信息

Rawashdeh Badi, Kim Joohyun, AlRyalat Saif Aldeen, Prasad Raj, Cooper Matthew

机构信息

Transplant Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA.

Opthalmology, The University of Jordan, Amman, JOR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Jul 19;15(7):e42150. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42150. eCollection 2023 Jul.


DOI:10.7759/cureus.42150
PMID:37602076
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10438857/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION: ChatGPT (OpenAI, San Francisco, California, United States) is a chatbot powered by language-based artificial intelligence (AI). It generates text based on the information provided by users. It is currently being evaluated in medical research, publishing, and healthcare. However, there has been no prior study on the evaluation of its ability to help in kidney transplant research. This feasibility study aimed to evaluate the application and accuracy of ChatGPT in the field of kidney transplantation. METHODS: On two separate dates, February 21 and March 2, 2023, ChatGPT 3.5 was questioned regarding the medical treatment of kidney transplants and related scientific facts. The responses provided by the chatbot were compiled, and a panel of two specialists reviewed the correctness of each answer. RESULTS: We demonstrated that ChatGPT possessed substantial general knowledge of kidney transplantation; however, they lacked sufficient information and had inaccurate information that necessitates a deeper understanding of the topic. Moreover, ChatGPT failed to provide references for any of the scientific data it provided regarding kidney transplants, and when requested for references, it provided inaccurate ones. CONCLUSION: The results of this short feasibility study indicate that ChatGPT may have the ability to assist in data collecting when a particular query is posed. However, caution should be exercised and it should not be used in isolation as a supplement to research or decisions regarding healthcare because there are still challenges with data accuracy and missing information.

摘要

引言:ChatGPT(美国加利福尼亚州旧金山的OpenAI公司)是一款由基于语言的人工智能驱动的聊天机器人。它根据用户提供的信息生成文本。目前它正在医学研究、出版和医疗保健领域接受评估。然而,此前尚无关于评估其在肾脏移植研究中辅助能力的研究。这项可行性研究旨在评估ChatGPT在肾脏移植领域的应用及准确性。 方法:在2023年2月21日和3月2日这两个不同日期,就肾脏移植的医学治疗及相关科学事实向ChatGPT 3.5提问。整理聊天机器人给出的回答,并由两位专家组成的小组审查每个答案的正确性。 结果:我们证明ChatGPT拥有大量关于肾脏移植的常识;然而,它们缺乏足够信息且存在不准确信息,这需要对该主题有更深入的理解。此外,ChatGPT未为其提供的任何关于肾脏移植的科学数据提供参考文献,当被要求提供参考文献时,它给出的是不准确的。 结论:这项简短可行性研究的结果表明,当提出特定问题时,ChatGPT可能有协助收集数据的能力。然而,应谨慎使用,且不应将其单独用作研究或医疗保健决策的补充,因为在数据准确性和信息缺失方面仍存在挑战。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eee1/10438857/f9cccf41d8c9/cureus-0015-00000042150-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eee1/10438857/f9cccf41d8c9/cureus-0015-00000042150-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eee1/10438857/f9cccf41d8c9/cureus-0015-00000042150-i01.jpg

相似文献

[1]
ChatGPT and Artificial Intelligence in Transplantation Research: Is It Always Correct?

Cureus. 2023-7-19

[2]
Accuracy of Information and References Using ChatGPT-3 for Retrieval of Clinical Radiological Information.

Can Assoc Radiol J. 2024-2

[3]
Exploring the Boundaries of Reality: Investigating the Phenomenon of Artificial Intelligence Hallucination in Scientific Writing Through ChatGPT References.

Cureus. 2023-4-11

[4]
ChatGPT: Is this version good for healthcare and research?

Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2023-4

[5]
ChatGPT: ethical concerns and challenges in academics and research.

J Infect Dev Ctries. 2023-9-30

[6]
Evaluation of the Artificial Intelligence Chatbot on Breast Reconstruction and Its Efficacy in Surgical Research: A Case Study.

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023-12

[7]
High Rates of Fabricated and Inaccurate References in ChatGPT-Generated Medical Content.

Cureus. 2023-5-19

[8]
Is ChatGPT accurate and reliable in answering questions regarding head and neck cancer?

Front Oncol. 2023-12-1

[9]
Accuracy of ChatGPT-3.5 and -4 in providing scientific references in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery.

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024-4

[10]
Accuracy of ChatGPT in Neurolocalization.

Cureus. 2024-4-27

引用本文的文献

[1]
Accuracy, Clarity, and Comprehensiveness of ChatGPT Outputs for Commonly Asked Questions About Living Kidney Donation.

Clin Transplant. 2025-9

[2]
Comparison of ChatGPT-3.5 and GPT-4 as potential tools in artificial intelligence-assisted clinical practice in renal and liver transplantation.

World J Transplant. 2025-9-18

[3]
Comparative Analysis of Generative Artificial Intelligence Systems in Solving Clinical Pharmacy Problems: Mixed Methods Study.

JMIR Med Inform. 2025-7-24

[4]
Areas of research focus and trends in the research on the application of AIGC in healthcare.

J Health Popul Nutr. 2025-6-14

[5]
Applications of ChatGPT in Heart Failure Prevention, Diagnosis, Management, and Research: A Narrative Review.

Diagnostics (Basel). 2024-10-27

[6]
Present and Future Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Kidney Transplantation.

J Clin Med. 2024-10-5

[7]
ChatGPT Solving Complex Kidney Transplant Cases: A Comparative Study With Human Respondents.

Clin Transplant. 2024-10

[8]
The transformative impact of large language models on medical writing and publishing: current applications, challenges and future directions.

Korean J Physiol Pharmacol. 2024-9-1

[9]
An evaluation of ChatGPT and Bard (Gemini) in the context of biological knowledge retrieval.

Access Microbiol. 2024-6-12

[10]
Artificial Intelligence and ChatGPT in Abdominopelvic Surgery: A Systematic Review of Applications and Impact.

In Vivo. 2024

本文引用的文献

[1]
Impact of ChatGPT on medical chatbots as a disruptive technology.

Front Artif Intell. 2023-4-5

[2]
ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns.

Healthcare (Basel). 2023-3-19

[3]
Assessing the performance of ChatGPT in answering questions regarding cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma.

Clin Mol Hepatol. 2023-7

[4]
Generative Pre-training Transformer Chat (ChatGPT) in the scientific community: the train has left the station.

Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2023-4

[5]
Evaluating the Feasibility of ChatGPT in Healthcare: An Analysis of Multiple Clinical and Research Scenarios.

J Med Syst. 2023-3-4

[6]
The Role of ChatGPT, Generative Language Models, and Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: A Conversation With ChatGPT and a Call for Papers.

JMIR Med Educ. 2023-3-6

[7]
Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models.

PLOS Digit Health. 2023-2-9

[8]
Can ChatGPT draft a research article? An example of population-level vaccine effectiveness analysis.

J Glob Health. 2023-2-17

[9]
Impact of COVID-19 on abdominal organ transplantation: A bibliometric analysis.

Transpl Infect Dis. 2023-6

[10]
ChatGPT: friend or foe?

Lancet Digit Health. 2023-3

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索