• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大语言模型对医学写作与出版的变革性影响:当前应用、挑战及未来方向

The transformative impact of large language models on medical writing and publishing: current applications, challenges and future directions.

作者信息

Ahn Sangzin

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology and PharmacoGenomics Research Center, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan 47392, Korea.

Center for Personalized Precision Medicine of Tuberculosis, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan 47392, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Physiol Pharmacol. 2024 Sep 1;28(5):393-401. doi: 10.4196/kjpp.2024.28.5.393.

DOI:10.4196/kjpp.2024.28.5.393
PMID:39198220
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11362003/
Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly transforming medical writing and publishing. This review article focuses on experimental evidence to provide a comprehensive overview of the current applications, challenges, and future implications of LLMs in various stages of academic research and publishing process. Global surveys reveal a high prevalence of LLM usage in scientific writing, with both potential benefits and challenges associated with its adoption. LLMs have been successfully applied in literature search, research design, writing assistance, quality assessment, citation generation, and data analysis. LLMs have also been used in peer review and publication processes, including manuscript screening, generating review comments, and identifying potential biases. To ensure the integrity and quality of scholarly work in the era of LLM-assisted research, responsible artificial intelligence (AI) use is crucial. Researchers should prioritize verifying the accuracy and reliability of AI-generated content, maintain transparency in the use of LLMs, and develop collaborative human-AI workflows. Reviewers should focus on higher-order reviewing skills and be aware of the potential use of LLMs in manuscripts. Editorial offices should develop clear policies and guidelines on AI use and foster open dialogue within the academic community. Future directions include addressing the limitations and biases of current LLMs, exploring innovative applications, and continuously updating policies and practices in response to technological advancements. Collaborative efforts among stakeholders are necessary to harness the transformative potential of LLMs while maintaining the integrity of medical writing and publishing.

摘要

大语言模型(LLMs)正在迅速改变医学写作和出版。这篇综述文章聚焦于实验证据,以全面概述大语言模型在学术研究和出版过程各个阶段的当前应用、挑战及未来影响。全球调查显示,大语言模型在科学写作中的使用非常普遍,采用它既有潜在益处,也有挑战。大语言模型已成功应用于文献检索、研究设计、写作辅助、质量评估、引文生成和数据分析。大语言模型还被用于同行评审和出版过程,包括稿件筛选、生成评审意见以及识别潜在偏差。为确保在大语言模型辅助研究时代学术工作的完整性和质量,负责任地使用人工智能(AI)至关重要。研究人员应优先核实人工智能生成内容的准确性和可靠性,在使用大语言模型时保持透明度,并开发人机协作的工作流程。评审人员应专注于更高层次的评审技能,并意识到稿件中可能使用了大语言模型。编辑办公室应制定关于人工智能使用的明确政策和指南,并促进学术界内部的开放对话。未来的方向包括解决当前大语言模型的局限性和偏差、探索创新应用,以及根据技术进步不断更新政策和实践。利益相关者之间的合作努力对于发挥大语言模型的变革潜力、同时保持医学写作和出版的完整性是必要的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a6a/11362003/e140510b9ca1/kjpp-28-5-393-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a6a/11362003/e140510b9ca1/kjpp-28-5-393-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a6a/11362003/e140510b9ca1/kjpp-28-5-393-f1.jpg

相似文献

1
The transformative impact of large language models on medical writing and publishing: current applications, challenges and future directions.大语言模型对医学写作与出版的变革性影响:当前应用、挑战及未来方向
Korean J Physiol Pharmacol. 2024 Sep 1;28(5):393-401. doi: 10.4196/kjpp.2024.28.5.393.
2
Guiding principles and proposed classification system for the responsible adoption of artificial intelligence in scientific writing in medicine.医学科学写作中负责任采用人工智能的指导原则和拟议分类系统。
Front Artif Intell. 2023 Nov 16;6:1283353. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1283353. eCollection 2023.
3
The Role of Large Language Models in Transforming Emergency Medicine: Scoping Review.大型语言模型在变革急诊医学中的作用:范围综述
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 May 10;12:e53787. doi: 10.2196/53787.
4
Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review.对抗审稿人疲劳还是加剧偏见?关于在学术同行评审中使用ChatGPT和其他大语言模型的思考与建议。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2023 May 18;8(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s41073-023-00133-5.
5
Implications of Large Language Models for Quality and Efficiency of Neurologic Care: Emerging Issues in Neurology.大语言模型对神经科护理质量和效率的影响:神经病学的新问题。
Neurology. 2024 Jun 11;102(11):e209497. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209497. Epub 2024 May 17.
6
Large language models are changing landscape of academic publications. A positive transformation?大型语言模型正在改变学术出版格局。这是积极的转变吗?
Cas Lek Cesk. 2024;162(7-8):294-297.
7
Large Language Models and User Trust: Consequence of Self-Referential Learning Loop and the Deskilling of Health Care Professionals.大语言模型与用户信任:自我参照学习循环的后果及医疗保健专业人员的技能退化
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Apr 25;26:e56764. doi: 10.2196/56764.
8
Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other Large Language Models in scholarly peer review.对抗审稿人疲劳还是放大偏见?关于在学术同行评审中使用ChatGPT和其他大语言模型的考量与建议。
Res Sq. 2023 Feb 20:rs.3.rs-2587766. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2587766/v1.
9
Large Language Models in Ophthalmology Scientific Writing: Ethical Considerations Blurred Lines or Not at All?大语言模型在眼科学术写作中的应用:伦理考量 界限模糊还是泾渭分明?
Am J Ophthalmol. 2023 Oct;254:177-181. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2023.06.004. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
10
ChatGPT and Beyond: An overview of the growing field of large language models and their use in ophthalmology.ChatGPT 及其他:大型语言模型不断发展的领域概述及其在眼科学中的应用。
Eye (Lond). 2024 May;38(7):1252-1261. doi: 10.1038/s41433-023-02915-z. Epub 2024 Jan 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Regulating the unseen hand: AI, authorship, and trust in medical science.规范无形之手:人工智能、作者身份与医学科学中的信任
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Jun 16;87(8):5353-5355. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003498. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
A guide to evade hallucinations and maintain reliability when using large language models for medical research: a narrative review.使用大语言模型进行医学研究时避免幻觉并保持可靠性的指南:一项叙述性综述。
Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2025 Jun;30(3):115-118. doi: 10.6065/apem.2448278.139. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
3
Effects of treatment with K7.4 activator, URO-K10, on the impaired relaxation of pulmonary arteries in the monocrotaline-induced pulmonary hypertensive rats.

本文引用的文献

1
Hidden flaws behind expert-level accuracy of multimodal GPT-4 vision in medicine.医学领域多模态GPT-4视觉专家级准确性背后的隐藏缺陷。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Jul 23;7(1):190. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01185-7.
2
Data science through natural language with ChatGPT's Code Interpreter.通过ChatGPT的代码解释器实现基于自然语言的数据科学。
Transl Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Jun;32(2):73-82. doi: 10.12793/tcp.2024.32.e8. Epub 2024 May 29.
3
Enhancing systematic reviews in orthodontics: a comparative examination of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 for generating PICO-based queries with tailored prompts and configurations.
K7.4激活剂URO-K10对野百合碱诱导的肺动脉高压大鼠肺动脉舒张功能受损的治疗作用。
Korean J Physiol Pharmacol. 2025 Jul 1;29(4):475-485. doi: 10.4196/kjpp.25.122.
4
Demographic and Physical Determinants of Unhealthy Food Consumption in Polish Long-Term Care Facilities.波兰长期护理机构中不健康食品消费的人口统计学和身体因素
Nutrients. 2025 Mar 13;17(6):1008. doi: 10.3390/nu17061008.
5
The Ability of Large Language Models to Generate Patient Information Materials for Retinopathy of Prematurity: Evaluation of Readability, Accuracy, and Comprehensiveness.大语言模型生成早产儿视网膜病变患者信息材料的能力:可读性、准确性和全面性评估
Turk J Ophthalmol. 2024 Dec 31;54(6):330-336. doi: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2024.58295.
加强正畸学中的系统评价:对GPT-3.5和GPT-4使用定制提示和配置生成基于PICO的查询的比较研究
Eur J Orthod. 2024 Apr 1;46(2). doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjae011.
4
What's in a Name? Experimental Evidence of Gender Bias in Recommendation Letters Generated by ChatGPT.名字里的乾坤:ChatGPT 生成的推荐信中的性别偏见的实验证据。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Mar 5;26:e51837. doi: 10.2196/51837.
5
Using generative artificial intelligence in bibliometric analysis: 10 years of research trends from the European Resuscitation Congresses.在文献计量分析中使用生成式人工智能:欧洲复苏大会十年研究趋势
Resusc Plus. 2024 Feb 22;18:100584. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100584. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Can ChatGPT assist authors with abstract writing in medical journals? Evaluating the quality of scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT and original abstracts.ChatGPT 能否协助医学期刊的作者撰写摘要?评估 ChatGPT 生成的科学摘要和原始摘要的质量。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 14;19(2):e0297701. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297701. eCollection 2024.
7
Human versus artificial intelligence-generated arthroplasty literature: A single-blinded analysis of perceived communication, quality, and authorship source.人工与人工智能生成的关节置换文献:感知交流、质量和作者来源的单盲分析。
Int J Med Robot. 2024 Feb;20(1):e2621. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2621.
8
Artificial Intelligence to Automate Health Economic Modelling: A Case Study to Evaluate the Potential Application of Large Language Models.人工智能实现健康经济建模自动化:评估大语言模型潜在应用的案例研究
Pharmacoecon Open. 2024 Mar;8(2):191-203. doi: 10.1007/s41669-024-00477-8. Epub 2024 Feb 10.
9
Exploring the potential of ChatGPT in the peer review process: An observational study.探索 ChatGPT 在同行评审过程中的潜力:一项观察性研究。
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2024 Feb;18(2):102946. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2024.102946. Epub 2024 Feb 3.
10
Academic publisher guidelines on AI usage: A ChatGPT supported thematic analysis.学术出版商关于人工智能使用的指南:一个基于 ChatGPT 的主题分析。
F1000Res. 2024 Jan 16;12:1398. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.142411.2. eCollection 2023.