Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont.
Department of Biobehavioral Health, Pennsylvania State University.
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2024 Jun;32(3):270-276. doi: 10.1037/pha0000677. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
Cigarette smoking puts individuals with or at risk for developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) in jeopardy of experiencing a major cardiovascular event. Contingency management (CM) for smoking cessation is an intervention wherein financial incentives are provided contingent on biochemically verified smoking abstinence. Conventional CM programs typically require frequent clinic visits for abstinence monitoring, a potential obstacle for patients with medical comorbidities who may face barriers to access. This preliminary study examined the feasibility and comparative efficacy of (a) usual care (UC; advice to quit smoking, self-help materials, quitline referral) versus (b) UC plus home-based CM for smoking cessation (UC + HBCM). HBCM entailed earning monetary-based vouchers contingent on self-reported 24-hr smoking abstinence biochemically verified by a breath carbon monoxide (CO) sample ≤ 6 ppm. Participants were 20 outpatients with a CVD diagnosis or qualifying CVD risk factor randomly assigned 1:1 to the two conditions. Intervention participants received 14 in-home abstinence visits over 6 weeks. Voucher monetary value started at $10 and escalated by $2.50 for each subsequent negative sample (maximum earnings: $367.50). Positive samples earned no vouchers and reset voucher value to $10, but two negative samples following a positive allowed participants to continue earning vouchers at the prereset value. Primary outcome was point-prevalence smoking abstinence at Week 6 assessment. More participants assigned to UC + HBCM than UC were smoking abstinent at that Week 6 assessment (90% vs. 30%), ²(1, = 20) = 7.5, < .01. These results provide initial evidence that HBCM can effectively promote smoking abstinence in CVD outpatients. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
吸烟使患有或有发展为心血管疾病 (CVD) 风险的个体面临经历重大心血管事件的危险。戒烟的应急管理 (CM) 是一种干预措施,其中根据生物化学验证的吸烟戒断提供经济奖励。传统的 CM 计划通常需要频繁到诊所进行戒烟监测,这对于可能面临就诊障碍的患有合并症的患者来说是一个潜在的障碍。这项初步研究检查了 (a) 常规护理 (UC;戒烟建议、自助材料、戒烟热线转介) 与 (b) UC 加基于家庭的 CM 戒烟 (UC + HBCM) 的可行性和比较疗效。HBCM 需要根据自我报告的 24 小时吸烟戒断情况获得货币为基础的代金券,这些代金券通过呼气一氧化碳 (CO) 样本 ≤ 6 ppm 进行生物化学验证。参与者为 20 名患有 CVD 诊断或符合 CVD 风险因素的门诊患者,随机分为 1:1 到两种条件。干预参与者在 6 周内接受了 14 次家庭戒烟访问。代金券的货币价值从 10 美元开始,每次后续的阴性样本(最大收益:367.50 美元)增加 2.50 美元。阳性样本不获得代金券,代金券价值重置为 10 美元,但在阳性样本之后出现两个阴性样本允许参与者继续以预设值获得代金券。主要结果是第 6 周评估时的点患病率吸烟戒断。与 UC 相比,更多被分配到 UC + HBCM 的参与者在第 6 周评估时吸烟戒断(90%比 30%),²(1, = 20) = 7.5, <.01。这些结果初步表明,HBCM 可以有效地促进 CVD 门诊患者的吸烟戒断。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。