• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脾切除术加贲门周围血管离断术治疗门静脉高压症后综合并发症指数高的危险因素。

Risk Factors for a High Comprehensive Complication Index after Splenectomy Plus Pericardial Devascularization for Portal Hypertension.

机构信息

Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.

出版信息

Turk J Gastroenterol. 2023 Oct;34(10):1041-1051. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2023.22756.

DOI:10.5152/tjg.2023.22756
PMID:37603301
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10645282/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Mathematical integration of all complications from the Clavien-Dindo classification into one number called the comprehensive complication index provides a novel method to capture morbidity. This objective of this study was to compare the evaluations of complications between the novel comprehensive complication index and Clavien-Dindo classification for portal hypertension patients who underwent splenectomy plus pericardial devascularization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients treated with either splenectomy plus simplified pericardial devascularization or splenectomy plus traditional pericardial devascularization were included retrospectively. Correlation and logistic regression analyses of the postoperative hospital stay and total hospitalization expense were compared between the comprehensive complication index and Clavien-Dindo classification. The cumulative sum-comprehensive complication index was generated and compared between operation types.

RESULTS

The Child-Pugh classification at admission, spleen thickness, and intraoperative blood loss were risk factors for high comprehensive complication index. Comprehensive complication index showed a stronger relationship with the postoperative hospital stay and total hospitalization expense than the Clavien-Dindo classification. Logistic regression analysis of the postoperative hospital stay demonstrated that the R2 values for the comprehensive complication index and Clavien-Dindo classification were 0.15 and 0.14, respectively. The cumulative sum-comprehensive complication index graph showed a steady dynamic decrease in the cumulative sum score for the individual operation type, with splenectomy plus simplified pericardial devascularization revealing a more notable decrease than splenectomy plus traditional pericardial devascularization.

CONCLUSIONS

Comprehensive complication index is an excellent method to assess postoperative morbidity in portal hypertension patients. The cumulative sum-comprehensive complication index chart can better dynamically monitor and compare different operation types. Splenectomy plus simplified pericardial devascularization is better than splenectomy plus traditional pericardial devascularization at decreasing cumulative sum-comprehensive complication index.

摘要

背景/目的:将 Clavien-Dindo 分类中的所有并发症综合为一个数字,即综合并发症指数,为评估发病率提供了一种新方法。本研究的目的是比较新型综合并发症指数与 Clavien-Dindo 分类在门静脉高压症患者脾切除加贲门周围血管离断术中评估并发症的效果。

材料和方法

回顾性纳入接受简化贲门周围血管离断术或传统贲门周围血管离断术治疗的患者。比较综合并发症指数与 Clavien-Dindo 分类对术后住院时间和总住院费用的相关性和逻辑回归分析。生成并比较了手术类型之间的累积和综合并发症指数。

结果

入院时的 Child-Pugh 分级、脾脏厚度和术中出血量是高综合并发症指数的危险因素。综合并发症指数与术后住院时间和总住院费用的相关性强于 Clavien-Dindo 分类。术后住院时间的逻辑回归分析显示,综合并发症指数和 Clavien-Dindo 分类的 R2 值分别为 0.15 和 0.14。累积和综合并发症指数图显示,两种手术类型的累积和评分均呈稳定下降趋势,其中简化贲门周围血管离断术组的下降更为显著。

结论

综合并发症指数是评估门静脉高压症患者术后发病率的一种极好方法。累积和综合并发症指数图可以更好地动态监测和比较不同的手术类型。与传统贲门周围血管离断术相比,简化贲门周围血管离断术更能降低累积和综合并发症指数。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6aac/10645282/8d0ceebef586/tjg-34-10-1041_f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6aac/10645282/968e4ceaaae9/tjg-34-10-1041_f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6aac/10645282/8d0ceebef586/tjg-34-10-1041_f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6aac/10645282/968e4ceaaae9/tjg-34-10-1041_f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6aac/10645282/8d0ceebef586/tjg-34-10-1041_f002.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk Factors for a High Comprehensive Complication Index after Splenectomy Plus Pericardial Devascularization for Portal Hypertension.脾切除术加贲门周围血管离断术治疗门静脉高压症后综合并发症指数高的危险因素。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2023 Oct;34(10):1041-1051. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2023.22756.
2
Comparison of two laparoscopic splenectomy plus pericardial devascularization techniques for management of portal hypertension and hypersplenism.两种腹腔镜脾切除术加心包血管离断术治疗门静脉高压症和脾功能亢进的比较
Surg Endosc. 2015 Dec;29(12):3819-26. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4147-4. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
3
Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic splenectomy plus pericardial devascularization using conventional instruments: initial experience of 5 cases.经脐单切口腹腔镜脾切除术联合使用传统器械的心包血管离断术:5例初步经验
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013 Feb;23(2):150-3. doi: 10.1089/lap.2012.0337. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
4
Comparison of Efficacy of Laparoscopic and Open Splenectomy Combined With Selective and Nonselective Pericardial Devascularization in Portal Hypertension Patients.腹腔镜与开放脾切除术联合选择性与非选择性心包血管离断术治疗门静脉高压症患者的疗效比较
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2018 Dec;28(6):401-403. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000581.
5
Open Radiofrequency Ablation Combined with Splenectomy and Pericardial Devascularization vs. Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Portal Hypertension and Hypersplenism: A Case-Matched Comparative Study.开放性射频消融联合脾切除术及心包去血管化与肝移植治疗门静脉高压症合并脾功能亢进的肝细胞癌患者:病例匹配对照研究
J Invest Surg. 2023 Dec;36(1):1-7. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2022.2130482.
6
Combined Laparoscopic Splenectomy and Esophagogastric Devascularization versus Open Splenectomy and Esophagogastric Devascularization for Portal Hypertension due to Liver Cirrhosis.腹腔镜联合脾切除术和贲门周围血管离断术与开腹脾切除术和贲门周围血管离断术治疗肝硬化门静脉高压症的比较。
Curr Med Sci. 2020 Feb;40(1):117-122. doi: 10.1007/s11596-020-2154-8. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
7
[Preoperative risk factors of portal venous thrombosis after splenectomy and gastric pericardial devascularization for portal hypertension].[脾切除联合贲门周围血管离断术治疗门静脉高压后门静脉血栓形成的术前危险因素]
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2014 Oct;22(10):739-43. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-3418.2014.10.005.
8
Laparoscopic splenectomy plus preoperative endoscopic variceal ligation versus splenectomy with pericardial devascularization (Hassab's operation) for control of severe varices due to portal hypertension.腹腔镜脾切除术加术前内镜下静脉曲张结扎术与脾切除加贲门周围血管离断术(哈萨布手术)治疗门静脉高压所致严重静脉曲张的疗效比较
Surg Endosc. 2013 Nov;27(11):4371-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3057-6. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
9
Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization for portal hypertension: A single-center experience.腹腔镜脾切除术联合贲门周围血管离断术治疗门静脉高压症的疗效及安全性:单中心经验
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Dec;97(50):e13703. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013703.
10
A meta-analysis study of laparoscopic versus open splenectomy with or without esophagogastric devascularization in the management of liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension.一项关于在肝硬化和门静脉高压症治疗中,腹腔镜脾切除术与开腹脾切除术(伴或不伴食管胃去血管化)的荟萃分析研究。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015 Feb;25(2):103-11. doi: 10.1089/lap.2014.0506.

本文引用的文献

1
Comprehensive complication index as a prognostic factor in minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.综合并发症指数作为微创食管切除术治疗食管鳞癌的预后因素。
Esophagus. 2022 Jul;19(3):410-416. doi: 10.1007/s10388-022-00911-y. Epub 2022 Feb 27.
2
Baveno VII - Renewing consensus in portal hypertension.《巴韦诺 VII 共识:门静脉高压领域的新共识》
J Hepatol. 2022 Apr;76(4):959-974. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.12.022. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
3
Using the Comprehensive Complication Index to Rethink the ISGLS Criteria for Post-hepatectomy Liver Failure in an International Cohort of Major Hepatectomies.
使用综合并发症指数重新思考国际大宗肝切除术队列中肝切除术后肝功能衰竭的 ISGLS 标准。
Ann Surg. 2023 Mar 1;277(3):e592-e596. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005338. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
4
Measuring the impact of complications after surgery for retroperitoneal sarcoma: Is comprehensive complication index better than Clavien-Dindo Classification?评估腹膜后肉瘤手术后并发症的影响:综合并发症指数是否优于Clavien-Dindo分类法?
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2022 May;48(5):978-984. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.12.010. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
5
Impact of concurrent splenectomy and esophagogastric devascularization on surgical outcomes of partial hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with clinically significant portal hypertension: A multicenter propensity score matching analysis.同期脾切除与食管胃去血管化对合并临床显著性门静脉高压的肝细胞癌患者肝部分切除术手术结局的影响:一项多中心倾向评分匹配分析
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2022 May;48(5):1078-1086. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.11.118. Epub 2021 Nov 20.
6
Evaluating the Validity of the Clavien-Dindo Classification in Colectomy Studies: A 90-Day Cost of Care Analysis.评估 Clavien-Dindo 分级在结直肠切除术研究中的有效性:90 天治疗费用分析。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2021 Nov 1;64(11):1426-1434. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001966.
7
Early Prediction of a Serious Postoperative Course in Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Trajectory Analysis of the Comprehensive Complication Index.肝门部胆管癌术后严重病程的早期预测:综合并发症指数的轨迹分析
Ann Surg. 2023 Mar 1;277(3):475-483. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005162. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
8
Modified Clavien-Dindo Classification and Outcome Prediction in Free Flap Reconstruction among Patients with Head and Neck Cancer.头颈部癌患者游离皮瓣重建的改良Clavien-Dindo分类及结果预测
J Clin Med. 2020 Nov 22;9(11):3770. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113770.
9
Postoperative survival analysis and prognostic nomogram model for patients with portal hypertension.术后生存分析及门静脉高压症患者预后列线图模型。
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Oct 21;24(39):4499-4509. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i39.4499.
10
The Comprehensive Complication Index: a New Measure of the Burden of Complications After Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.全面并发症指数:一种评估腹腔热灌注化疗后并发症负担的新指标。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Mar;25(3):688-693. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-6157-z. Epub 2017 Dec 19.