Patkar Shraddha, Patel Swapnil, Gupta Amit, Ostwal Vikas, Ramaswamy Anant, Shetty Nitin, Goel Mahesh
Gastrointestinal and Hepato-pancreato-Biliary Service, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Department of Surgical Oncology, MPMMCC & Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Varanasi, India.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2023 Oct;49(10):107035. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107035. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
Level I evidence for multi-modality management of gallbladder cancers (GBC) is evolving.
Prospectively maintained operative GBC database of 1307 patients (year 2010-2019) was analysed to study the impact of peri-operative chemotherapy (PCT) on survival outcomes.
1040 patients had pathologically confirmed GBC. Stage distribution showed: Stage I(85,8.2%), II(247,23.8%), III(460,44.2%), IV(248, 23.8%). PCT was used as follows: in stage II, 164 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy(ACT); in stage III, ACT was given to 444 patients, either operated upfront(244 patients) or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT)(216 patients); in stage IV, 32 patients (11 received NACT) underwent radical surgery followed by ACT and 216 patients had inoperable disease (77 received NACT) upon exploration. With a median follow-up of 30 months, the 3-year OS for stage I, II and III was 94.1%, 82.6% and 48.2% respectively. Corresponding DFS was 93.8%, 67.3% and 38.3%. Upon reassessment for surgery after NACT (n = 332), patients who underwent radical surgery (n = 235) had superior OS (p = 0.000) and DFS (p = 0.000) in comparison to those who had inoperable disease (n = 97). Amongst stage III and IV patients with operable disease (n = 492), those who were operated upfront (n = 238) had equivalent survival as those operated after NACT (n = 254). This was also confirmed by a 1:1 propensity matched analysis (118 patients each), matching for T and N stage.
The role of peri-operative chemotherapy in management of GBC is evolving. While the role of NACT for locally advanced GBC is unsettled and merits testing prospectively, it helps in selection of patients with favourable disease biology for radical surgery.
胆囊癌(GBC)多模式管理的一级证据正在不断发展。
分析前瞻性维护的1307例患者(2010 - 2019年)的手术GBC数据库,以研究围手术期化疗(PCT)对生存结果的影响。
1040例患者经病理确诊为GBC。分期分布显示:I期(85例,8.2%),II期(247例,23.8%),III期(460例,44.2%),IV期(248例,23.8%)。PCT的使用情况如下:在II期,164例患者接受辅助化疗(ACT);在III期,444例患者接受ACT,其中244例患者直接进行手术,216例患者接受新辅助化疗(NACT)后进行手术;在IV期,32例患者(11例接受NACT)接受根治性手术后进行ACT,216例患者在探查时患有无法手术的疾病(77例接受NACT)。中位随访30个月,I期、II期和III期的3年总生存率分别为94.1%、82.6%和48.2%。相应的无病生存率分别为93.8%、67.3%和38.3%。在对NACT后(n = 332)的手术进行重新评估时,与患有无法手术疾病的患者(n = 97)相比,接受根治性手术的患者(n = 235)具有更高的总生存率(p = 0.000)和无病生存率(p = 0.000)。在III期和IV期可手术疾病的患者(n = 492)中,直接进行手术的患者(n = 238)与接受NACT后进行手术的患者(n = 254)的生存率相当。这也通过1:1倾向匹配分析(每组118例患者)得到证实,匹配T和N分期。
围手术期化疗在GBC管理中的作用正在不断发展。虽然NACT对局部晚期GBC的作用尚未确定,值得进行前瞻性测试,但它有助于选择具有良好疾病生物学特征的患者进行根治性手术。