Frequency settings of subthalamic nucleus DBS for Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION

Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for the motor symptoms of Parkinson's Disease. The targeted physiological structure for lead location is commonly the subthalamic nucleus (STN). The efficacy of DBS for improving motor symptoms is assessed via the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating III Scale (UPDRS-III). In this study, we sought to compare the efficacy of frequency settings utilized for STN-DBS.

METHODS

Following PRISMA Guidelines, a search on PUBMED and MEDLINE was performed to include full-length randomized controlled trials evaluating STN-DBS. The frequency stimulation parameters and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS-III) outcomes were extracted in the search. High-frequency stimulation (HFS) was defined as ≥100 Hz and low-frequency stimulation (LFS) was defined as <100 Hz. A frequentist network meta-analysis was performed with odds ratios (OR) and pooling performed using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Statistics are presented as OR [95% CI].

RESULTS

15 studies consisting of 298 patients were included for analysis. Bilateral HFS -0.68 [-0.89; -0.46] was associated with better UPDRS-III scores compared to bilateral LFS. On the other hand, bilateral LFS with medications (MEDS) was favored over HFS with MEDS (-0.28 [-0.63; 0.07]). Bilateral LFS and MEDS, HFS and MEDS, stimulation (STIM) OFF MEDS ON, HFS, LFS, STIM OFF MEDS OFF UPDRS outcomes were ranked from best to worst outcomes.

DISCUSSION

The outcomes of this study suggest that bilateral HFS has better utility for those with no response to medication, while LFS has additive benefits to medication by improving unique symptoms via different neurophysiological mechanisms.