Department of Communication Science and Disorders, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, 5060A Forbes Tower, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA.
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 21;13(1):13636. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40645-0.
Hearing thresholds form the gold standard assessment in Audiology clinics. However, ~ 10% of adult patients seeking audiological care for self-perceived hearing deficits have thresholds that are normal. Currently, a diagnostic assessment for auditory processing disorder (APD) remains one of the few viable avenues of further care for this patient population, yet there are no standard guidelines for referrals. Here, we identified tests within the APD testing battery that could provide a rapid screener to inform APD referrals in adults. We first analyzed records from the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Audiology database to identify adult patients with self-perceived hearing difficulties despite normal audiometric thresholds. We then looked at the patients who were referred for APD testing. We examined test performances, correlational relationships, and classification accuracies. Patients experienced most difficulties within the dichotic domain of testing. Additionally, accuracies calculated from sensitivities and specificities revealed the words-in-noise (WIN), the Random Dichotic Digits Task (RDDT) and Quick Speech in Noise (QuickSIN) tests had the highest classification accuracies. The addition of these tests have the greatest promise as a quick screener during routine audiological assessments to help identify adult patients who may be referred for APD assessment and resulting treatment plans.
听力阈值是听力学临床评估的金标准。然而,约有 10%的成年患者因自我感知的听力缺陷寻求听力护理,但他们的听力阈值正常。目前,听觉处理障碍(APD)的诊断评估仍然是该患者群体进一步护理的少数可行途径之一,但对于转诊尚无标准指南。在这里,我们确定了 APD 测试套件中的测试,可以为成人 APD 转诊提供快速筛查。我们首先分析了匹兹堡大学医学中心(UPMC)听力学数据库中的记录,以确定尽管听力阈值正常但自我感知听力困难的成年患者。然后,我们观察了那些被转诊进行 APD 测试的患者。我们检查了测试表现、相关性和分类准确性。患者在测试的双听域中遇到的困难最大。此外,根据敏感性和特异性计算的准确性表明,噪声中单词测试(WIN)、随机双听数字测试(RDDT)和噪声中快速语音测试(QuickSIN)具有最高的分类准确性。这些测试的加入最有希望作为常规听力学评估中的快速筛查工具,以帮助识别可能需要进行 APD 评估和相应治疗计划的成年患者。