• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作能力支持量表在寻求重度获得性脑损伤后重返工作的个体中的验证。

Validation of the work-ability support scale in individuals seeking to return to work after severe acquired brain injury.

机构信息

Brain Injury Rehabilitation Research Group, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia.

Brain Injury Rehabilitation Unit, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Jul;46(14):3164-3175. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2243819. Epub 2023 Aug 22.

DOI:10.1080/09638288.2023.2243819
PMID:37606282
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the reliability and validity of the work-ability support scale (WSS) in a severe traumatic/acquired brain injury (TBI/ABI) population seeking to return to work (RTW).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred forty-four clients were enrolled in a vocational rehabilitation (VR) intervention trial through the Brain Injury Rehabilitation Program in New South Wales, Australia. Each client's primary brain injury clinician and VR provider completed the WSS pre- and post-intervention. Validating measures assessing dysexecutive behavior, disability, participation, and work instability were completed. Several aspects of reliability and validity were evaluated.

RESULTS

Internal consistency was excellent for Part A (Cronbach's s > 0.9) but unacceptably low to questionable for Part B (s < 0.6). Inter-rater reliability between clinicians and VR providers was generally fair to moderate for Part A ( < 0.6) and worse for Part B ( < 0.5), with both slightly improving at post-intervention. Strong support was found for predictive and convergent validity, but not divergent validity. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated a poor fit for Part A, whereas most Part B fit indices met criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

The WSS can play a useful role in assessing return to work (RTW) potential, planning and evaluation after severe TBI/ABI. Training could improve consistency of administration among staff working across health and VR service sectors.

摘要

目的

评估工作能力支持量表(WSS)在寻求重返工作(RTW)的严重创伤性/获得性脑损伤(TBI/ABI)人群中的可靠性和有效性。

材料与方法

通过澳大利亚新南威尔士州脑损伤康复计划,144 名患者入组一项职业康复(VR)干预试验。每位患者的主要脑损伤临床医生和 VR 提供者在干预前后均完成了 WSS 评估。还完成了评估执行功能障碍、残疾、参与度和工作稳定性的有效验证措施。评估了多个可靠性和有效性方面。

结果

A 部分的内部一致性非常好(Cronbach's s > 0.9),但 B 部分的一致性差(s < 0.6),令人质疑。临床医生和 VR 提供者之间的评分者间信度对于 A 部分通常为一般到中度(<0.6),对于 B 部分更差(<0.5),且两者在干预后都略有提高。强烈支持预测性和收敛有效性,但不支持发散有效性。验证性因子分析表明 A 部分的拟合度较差,而 B 部分的大部分拟合指数均符合标准。

结论

WSS 可在评估严重 TBI/ABI 后重返工作(RTW)的可能性、计划和评估方面发挥有用作用。培训可以提高跨卫生和 VR 服务部门工作的员工在管理方面的一致性。

相似文献

1
Validation of the work-ability support scale in individuals seeking to return to work after severe acquired brain injury.工作能力支持量表在寻求重度获得性脑损伤后重返工作的个体中的验证。
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Jul;46(14):3164-3175. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2243819. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
2
A vocational intervention that enhances return to work after severe acquired brain injury: A pragmatic trial.一项增强严重后天性脑损伤后重返工作岗位的职业干预措施:一项实用试验。
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2023 Nov;66(8):101787. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2023.101787. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
3
Identifying models, processes, and components of vocational rehabilitation following acquired brain injury: a systematic scoping review.识别后天性脑损伤后职业康复的模式、流程和组成部分:系统范围界定综述。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Dec;44(24):7641-7654. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1980622. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
4
Exploring the lived return-to-work experience of individuals with acquired brain injury: use of vocational services and environmental, personal and injury-related influences.探索后天性脑损伤患者的实际重返工作经历:职业服务的使用以及环境、个人和与损伤相关的影响因素
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Aug;44(16):4332-4342. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1903101. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
5
A manual-based vocational rehabilitation program for patients with an acquired brain injury: study protocol of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT).一项针对后天性脑损伤患者的基于手册的职业康复计划:一项实用随机对照试验(RCT)的研究方案。
Trials. 2017 Aug 10;18(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2115-0.
6
Early, specialist vocational rehabilitation to facilitate return to work after traumatic brain injury: the FRESH feasibility RCT.早期、专业的职业康复促进创伤性脑损伤后重返工作岗位:FRESH 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 May;22(33):1-124. doi: 10.3310/hta22330.
7
Development and feasibility testing of a psychoeducational tool to support the return to work (RTW) of individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI): The RTW after TBI app.创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者重返工作岗位(RTW)的心理教育工具的开发和可行性测试:TBI 后的 RTW 应用程序。
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2023 Sep;33(8):1349-1367. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2022.2097928. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
8
Scoping review of return-to-work interventions for persons with traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤患者重返工作岗位干预措施的范围综述
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Jul;46(15):3243-3255. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2243583. Epub 2023 Aug 8.
9
Combined cognitive and vocational interventions after mild to moderate traumatic brain injury: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.轻至中度创伤性脑损伤后的认知与职业联合干预:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Oct 17;18(1):483. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2218-7.
10
What Does It Take to Get Somebody Back to Work after Severe Acquired Brain Injury? Service Actions within the Vocational Intervention Program (VIP 2.0).重度颅脑损伤后让某人重返工作岗位需要什么?职业干预计划(VIP 2.0)中的服务行动。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 3;19(15):9548. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159548.