Suppr超能文献

工作能力支持量表在寻求重度获得性脑损伤后重返工作的个体中的验证。

Validation of the work-ability support scale in individuals seeking to return to work after severe acquired brain injury.

机构信息

Brain Injury Rehabilitation Research Group, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia.

Brain Injury Rehabilitation Unit, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Jul;46(14):3164-3175. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2243819. Epub 2023 Aug 22.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the reliability and validity of the work-ability support scale (WSS) in a severe traumatic/acquired brain injury (TBI/ABI) population seeking to return to work (RTW).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred forty-four clients were enrolled in a vocational rehabilitation (VR) intervention trial through the Brain Injury Rehabilitation Program in New South Wales, Australia. Each client's primary brain injury clinician and VR provider completed the WSS pre- and post-intervention. Validating measures assessing dysexecutive behavior, disability, participation, and work instability were completed. Several aspects of reliability and validity were evaluated.

RESULTS

Internal consistency was excellent for Part A (Cronbach's s > 0.9) but unacceptably low to questionable for Part B (s < 0.6). Inter-rater reliability between clinicians and VR providers was generally fair to moderate for Part A ( < 0.6) and worse for Part B ( < 0.5), with both slightly improving at post-intervention. Strong support was found for predictive and convergent validity, but not divergent validity. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated a poor fit for Part A, whereas most Part B fit indices met criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

The WSS can play a useful role in assessing return to work (RTW) potential, planning and evaluation after severe TBI/ABI. Training could improve consistency of administration among staff working across health and VR service sectors.

摘要

目的

评估工作能力支持量表(WSS)在寻求重返工作(RTW)的严重创伤性/获得性脑损伤(TBI/ABI)人群中的可靠性和有效性。

材料与方法

通过澳大利亚新南威尔士州脑损伤康复计划,144 名患者入组一项职业康复(VR)干预试验。每位患者的主要脑损伤临床医生和 VR 提供者在干预前后均完成了 WSS 评估。还完成了评估执行功能障碍、残疾、参与度和工作稳定性的有效验证措施。评估了多个可靠性和有效性方面。

结果

A 部分的内部一致性非常好(Cronbach's s > 0.9),但 B 部分的一致性差(s < 0.6),令人质疑。临床医生和 VR 提供者之间的评分者间信度对于 A 部分通常为一般到中度(<0.6),对于 B 部分更差(<0.5),且两者在干预后都略有提高。强烈支持预测性和收敛有效性,但不支持发散有效性。验证性因子分析表明 A 部分的拟合度较差,而 B 部分的大部分拟合指数均符合标准。

结论

WSS 可在评估严重 TBI/ABI 后重返工作(RTW)的可能性、计划和评估方面发挥有用作用。培训可以提高跨卫生和 VR 服务部门工作的员工在管理方面的一致性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验