文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

阴道镜检查的时机与宫颈癌风险。

Timing of Colposcopy and Risk of Cervical Cancer.

机构信息

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and the Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston; Massachusetts; Department of Population & Data Sciences and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, and the Parkland Health and Hospital System, Dallas, Texas; the Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago Biological Sciences Division, Chicago, Illinois; the Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington; and the Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Nov 1;142(5):1125-1134. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005313. Epub 2023 Aug 21.


DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000005313
PMID:37607530
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10637756/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the association between time to colposcopy and risk of subsequent cervical cancer. METHODS: A longitudinal analysis of patients aged 21-79 years with an abnormal cervical cancer test result from health care systems in Texas, Massachusetts, and Washington was performed. The outcome was a cervical cancer diagnosis 12 months or more after the abnormal result. The primary analysis compared receipt of colposcopy within 3 months (91 days or less) with receipt of colposcopy at 3-12 months (92-365 days) and no colposcopy within 12 months of the abnormal test result; post hoc analyses compared colposcopy within 12 months (365 days or less) with no colposcopy within 12 months. Associations were assessed with multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression controlling for age, risk status, result severity, and health care system. RESULTS: Of 17,541 patients, 53.3% of patients received colposcopy within 3 months, 22.2% received colposcopy in 3-12 months, and 24.6% had no colposcopy within 12 months. One hundred forty-seven patients were diagnosed with cervical cancer within 12 months and removed from subsequent analyses. Sixty-five patients (0.4%) were diagnosed with cervical cancer more than 1 year (366 days or more) after the abnormal Pap or human papillomavirus test result. The risk of cervical cancer detection more than 1 year after the abnormal test result was not different in patients who received colposcopy within 3-12 months (hazard ratio [HR] 1.07, 95% CI 0.54-2.12) and higher among patients with no colposcopy within 12 months (HR 2.34, 95% CI 1.33-4.14) compared with patients who had colposcopy within 3 months. Post hoc analyses showed that the risk of cervical cancer diagnosis was 2.29-fold higher among those without colposcopy within 12 months compared with those who received colposcopy within 12 months (95% CI 1.37-3.83); among patients with high-grade cytology results, the risk of cervical cancer detection among those without colposcopy within 12 months was 3.12-fold higher compared with those who received colposcopy within 12 months (95% CI 1.47-6.70). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in cervical cancer risk at more than 1 year between patients who received colposcopy within 3 months compared with those who received colposcopy within 3-12 months of an abnormal result. Patients who did not receive colposcopy within 12 months of an abnormal result had a higher risk of subsequent cervical cancer compared with those who received a colposcopy within 12 months.

摘要

目的:量化阴道镜检查时间与宫颈癌后续风险之间的关联。

方法:对来自德克萨斯州、马萨诸塞州和华盛顿卫生保健系统的年龄在 21-79 岁之间、宫颈癌检查结果异常的患者进行了纵向分析。结局是在异常结果后 12 个月或更长时间发生宫颈癌诊断。主要分析比较了在 3 个月内(91 天或更短)接受阴道镜检查与在 3-12 个月内(92-365 天)接受阴道镜检查和 12 个月内未接受阴道镜检查之间的差异;事后分析比较了 12 个月内(365 天或更短)接受阴道镜检查与 12 个月内未接受阴道镜检查之间的差异。使用多变量 Cox 比例风险回归评估关联,控制年龄、风险状况、结果严重程度和卫生保健系统。

结果:在 17541 名患者中,53.3%的患者在 3 个月内接受了阴道镜检查,22.2%的患者在 3-12 个月内接受了阴道镜检查,24.6%的患者在 12 个月内未接受阴道镜检查。147 名患者在 12 个月内被诊断为宫颈癌,并从后续分析中删除。65 名患者(0.4%)在异常巴氏试验或人乳头瘤病毒试验结果后 1 年(366 天或更长时间)被诊断为宫颈癌。在 3-12 个月内接受阴道镜检查的患者(风险比[HR]1.07,95%CI0.54-2.12)和 12 个月内未接受阴道镜检查的患者(HR2.34,95%CI1.33-4.14)中,异常试验结果后 1 年发现宫颈癌的风险并无差异,与在 3 个月内接受阴道镜检查的患者相比。事后分析表明,与 12 个月内接受阴道镜检查的患者相比,12 个月内未接受阴道镜检查的患者宫颈癌诊断风险高 2.29 倍(95%CI1.37-3.83);在高级别细胞学结果患者中,与 12 个月内接受阴道镜检查的患者相比,12 个月内未接受阴道镜检查的患者宫颈癌检出率高 3.12 倍(95%CI1.47-6.70)。

结论:在异常结果后 3 个月内接受阴道镜检查的患者与在 3-12 个月内接受阴道镜检查的患者之间,1 年以上的宫颈癌风险无差异。与 12 个月内接受阴道镜检查的患者相比,12 个月内未接受阴道镜检查的患者发生后续宫颈癌的风险更高。

相似文献

[1]
Timing of Colposcopy and Risk of Cervical Cancer.

Obstet Gynecol. 2023-11-1

[2]
Minimally abnormal Pap testing and cervical histology in HIV-infected women.

J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011-10-19

[3]
Yield and mode of diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 or cancer among women with negative cervical cytology and positive high-risk human papillomavirus test results.

J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2013-10

[4]
Factors associated with timely colposcopy following an abnormal cervical cancer test result.

Prev Med. 2022-11

[5]
Identifying women with cervical neoplasia: using human papillomavirus DNA testing for equivocal Papanicolaou results.

JAMA. 1999-5-5

[6]
Risk of Cervical Dysplasia After Colposcopy Care and Risk-Informed Return to Population-Based Screening: A Systematic Review.

J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2020-5

[7]
Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in the management of women with abnormal Pap smears. Experience of a colposcopy referral clinic.

Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2004

[8]
Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.

Lancet Oncol. 2011-8-22

[9]
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.

Health Technol Assess. 2014-4

[10]
A pilot study of HPV DNA and cytology testing in 50,159 women in the routine Mexican Social Security Program.

Cancer Causes Control. 2010-7-9

引用本文的文献

[1]
Barriers to the Equitable Implementation of Risk-Based Cervical Cancer Management Guidelines.

J Gen Intern Med. 2025-5-30

[2]
Eliminating VEGFA+ tumor-associated neutrophils by antibody-drug conjugates boosts antitumor immunity and potentiates PD-1 immunotherapy in preclinical models of cervical cancer.

Cell Death Dis. 2025-2-19

[3]
Detecting and localizing cervical lesions in colposcopic images with deep semantic feature mining.

Front Oncol. 2024-11-22

本文引用的文献

[1]
Factors associated with timely colposcopy following an abnormal cervical cancer test result.

Prev Med. 2022-11

[2]
Gaps in the screening process for women diagnosed with cervical cancer in four diverse US health care settings.

Cancer Med. 2023-2

[3]
Evaluating and Improving Cancer Screening Process Quality in a Multilevel Context: The PROSPR II Consortium Design and Research Agenda.

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2022-8-2

[4]
The trajectory of racial/ethnic disparities in the use of cancer screening before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A large U.S. academic center analysis.

Prev Med. 2021-10

[5]
Prioritizing cervical cancer screening services during the COVID-19 pandemic: Response of an academic medical center and a public safety net hospital in California.

Prev Med. 2021-10

[6]
Special ambulatory gynecologic considerations in the era of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and implications for future practice.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020-6-6

[7]
European Federation for Colposcopy (EFC) and European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) joint considerations about human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination, screening programs, colposcopy, and surgery during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020-8

[8]
Cervical cancer screening research in the PROSPR I consortium: Rationale, methods and baseline findings from a US cohort.

Int J Cancer. 2018-12-20

[9]
Timely follow-up of positive cancer screening results: A systematic review and recommendations from the PROSPR Consortium.

CA Cancer J Clin. 2018-3-30

[10]
Effect of Time to Diagnostic Testing for Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Abnormalities on Screening Efficacy: A Modeling Study.

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017-11-17

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索