Stavres Jon, Aultman Ryan A, Brandner Caleb F, Newsome Ta'Quoris A, Vallecillo-Bustos Anabelle, Wise Havens L, Henderson Alex, Stanfield Diavion, Mannozzi Joseph, Graybeal Austin J
School of Kinesiology and Nutrition, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS, United States.
Department of Physiology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, United States.
Front Physiol. 2023 Aug 7;14:1212775. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1212775. eCollection 2023.
Prior studies report conflicting evidence regarding exercise pressor and metaboreflex responses in individuals with metabolic syndrome (MetS). To test the hypotheses that 1) exercise pressor and metaboreflex responses are exaggerated in MetS and 2) these differences may be explained by elevated resting blood pressure. Blood pressure and heart rate (HR) were evaluated in 26 participants (13 MetS) during 2 min of handgrip exercise followed by 3 min of post-exercise circulatory occlusion (PECO). Systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP), along with HR and a cumulative blood pressure index (BPI), were compared between groups using independent samples -tests, and analyses of covariance were used to adjust for differences in resting blood pressure, fasting blood glucose (FBG), and waist circumference (WC). ΔSBP (∼78% and ∼54%), ΔMAP (∼67% and ∼55%), and BPI (∼16% and ∼20%) responses were significantly exaggerated in individuals with MetS during handgrip and PECO, respectively (all ≤ 0.04). ΔDBP, ΔMAP, and BPI responses during handgrip remained significantly different between groups after independently covarying for resting blood pressure ( < 0.01), and after simultaneously covarying for resting blood pressure, FBG, and WC ( ≤ 0.03). Likewise, peak SBP, DBP, MAP, and BPI responses during PECO remained significantly different between groups after adjusting for resting blood pressure ( ≤ 0.03), with peak SBP, MAP, and BPI response remaining different between groups after adjusting for all three covariates simultaneously ( ≤ 0.04). These data suggest that exercise pressor and metaboreflex responses are significantly exaggerated in MetS independent of differences in resting blood pressure, FBG, or WC.
先前的研究报告了关于代谢综合征(MetS)患者运动升压反射和代谢反射反应的相互矛盾的证据。为了验证以下假设:1)MetS患者的运动升压反射和代谢反射反应会增强;2)这些差异可能由静息血压升高来解释。在26名参与者(13名患有MetS)进行2分钟握力运动,随后进行3分钟运动后循环阻断(PECO)期间,对血压和心率(HR)进行了评估。使用独立样本t检验比较了两组之间的收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、平均动脉压(MAP)以及HR和累积血压指数(BPI),并使用协方差分析来调整静息血压、空腹血糖(FBG)和腰围(WC)的差异。在握力运动和PECO期间,MetS患者的ΔSBP(约78%和约54%)、ΔMAP(约67%和约55%)和BPI(约16%和约20%)反应分别显著增强(均P≤0.04)。在对静息血压进行独立协变量调整后(P<0.01),以及在对静息血压、FBG和WC进行同时协变量调整后(P≤0.03),握力运动期间的ΔDBP、ΔMAP和BPI反应在两组之间仍存在显著差异。同样,在对静息血压进行调整后(P≤0.03),PECO期间的峰值SBP、DBP、MAP和BPI反应在两组之间仍存在显著差异,在对所有三个协变量进行同时调整后,峰值SBP、MAP和BPI反应在两组之间仍存在差异(P≤0.04)。这些数据表明,在MetS患者中,运动升压反射和代谢反射反应显著增强,与静息血压、FBG或WC的差异无关。