Anam Choirul, Amilia Riska, Naufal Ariij, Sutanto Heri, Dwihapsari Yanurita, Fujibuchi Toshioh, Dougherty Geoff
Department of Physics, Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, Diponegoro University, Jl. Prof Soedarto, SH Tembalang, Semarang 50275, Central Java, Indonesia.
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science and Data Analytics, Institute Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Kampus ITS Sukolilo - Surabaya 60111, East Java, Indonesia.
J Biomed Phys Eng. 2023 Aug 1;13(4):353-362. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2302-1599. eCollection 2023 Aug.
Methods for segmentation, i.e., Full-segmentation (FS) and Segmentation-rotation (SR), are proposed for maintaining Computed Tomography (CT) number linearity. However, their effectiveness has not yet been tested against noise.
This study aimed to evaluate the influence of noise on the accuracy of CT number linearity of the FS and SR methods on American College of Radiology (ACR) CT and computational phantoms.
This experimental study utilized two phantoms, ACR CT and computational phantoms. An ACR CT phantom was scanned by a 128-slice CT scanner with various tube currents from 80 to 200 mA to acquire various noises, with other constant parameters. The computational phantom was added by different Gaussian noises between 20 and 120 Hounsfield Units (HU). The CT number linearity was measured by the FS and SR methods, and the accuracy of CT number linearity was computed on two phantoms.
The two methods successfully segmented both phantoms at low noise, i.e., less than 60 HU. However, segmentation and measurement of CT number linearity are not accurate on a computational phantom using the FS method for more than 60-HU noise. The SR method is still accurate up to 120 HU of noise.
The SR method outperformed the FS method to measure the CT number linearity due to its endurance in extreme noise.
为保持计算机断层扫描(CT)值的线性,提出了全分割(FS)和分割旋转(SR)等分割方法。然而,它们在噪声环境下的有效性尚未得到测试。
本研究旨在评估噪声对美国放射学会(ACR)CT模型和计算体模上FS和SR方法CT值线性准确性的影响。
本实验研究使用了两种体模,即ACR CT模型和计算体模。使用128层CT扫描仪对ACR CT模型进行扫描,管电流从80至200 mA变化以获取不同噪声,其他参数保持不变。在计算体模中添加20至120亨氏单位(HU)之间的不同高斯噪声。通过FS和SR方法测量CT值线性,并计算两种体模上CT值线性的准确性。
在低噪声(即小于60 HU)情况下,两种方法均成功分割了两种体模。然而,对于噪声超过60 HU的计算体模,使用FS方法进行CT值线性的分割和测量并不准确。SR方法在噪声高达120 HU时仍保持准确。
由于SR方法在极端噪声环境下的耐受性,其在测量CT值线性方面优于FS方法。