Dr Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine Nova Southeastern University Davie FL.
Cardiovascular Division University of Minnesota Medical School Minneapolis MN.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Sep 5;12(17):e029074. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.029074. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
Background Recent guidelines have emphasized the use of medical management, early diagnosis, and a multidisciplinary team to effectively treat patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). Previous literature briefly highlighted the current racial disparities in its intervention. Herein, we analyze the trend over a 14-year time period to investigate whether the disparities gap in CLI management is closing. Methods and Results The National Inpatient Sample was queried between 2005 and 2018 for hospitalizations involving CLI. Nontraumatic amputations and revascularization were identified. Utilization trends of these procedures were compared between races (White, Black, Hispanic, Asian and Pacific Islander, Native American, and Other). Multivariable regression assessed differences in race regarding procedure usage. There were 6 904 562 admissions involving CLI in the 14-year study period. The rate of admissions in White patients who received any revascularization decreased by 0.23% (<0.001) and decreased by 0.25% (=0.025) for Asian and Pacific Islander patients. Among all patients, the annual rate of admission in White patients who received any amputation increased by 0.21% (<0.001), increased by 0.19% (=0.001) for Hispanic patients, and increased by 0.19% (=0.012) for the Other race patients. Admissions involving Black, Hispanic, Asian and Pacific Islander, or Other race patients had higher odds of receiving any revascularization compared with White patients. All races had higher odds of receiving major amputation compared with White patients. Conclusions Our analysis highlights disparities in CLI treatment in our nationally representative sample. Non-White patients are more likely to receive invasive treatments, including major amputations and revascularization for CLI, compared with White patients.
最近的指南强调了使用医学管理、早期诊断和多学科团队来有效治疗严重肢体缺血(CLI)患者。之前的文献简要强调了其干预措施中当前的种族差异。在此,我们分析了 14 年的时间趋势,以调查 CLI 管理中的差异差距是否在缩小。
在 2005 年至 2018 年期间,国家住院患者样本(NIS)对涉及 CLI 的住院患者进行了查询。确定了非创伤性截肢和血运重建。比较了这些程序在不同种族(白种人、黑种人、西班牙裔、亚洲和太平洋岛民、美国原住民和其他)之间的使用趋势。多变量回归评估了种族与程序使用之间的差异。在 14 年的研究期间,共有 6904562 例 CLI 住院患者。接受任何血运重建的白种人患者的入院率下降了 0.23%(<0.001),而亚洲和太平洋岛民患者下降了 0.25%(=0.025)。在所有患者中,接受任何截肢的白种人患者的年入院率增加了 0.21%(<0.001),西班牙裔患者增加了 0.19%(=0.001),其他种族患者增加了 0.19%(=0.012)。与白种人患者相比,黑种人、西班牙裔、亚洲和太平洋岛民或其他种族患者接受任何血运重建的可能性更高。与白种人患者相比,所有种族患者接受主要截肢的可能性更高。
我们的分析突出了我们具有代表性的全国样本中 CLI 治疗的差异。与白种人患者相比,非白种人患者更有可能接受侵入性治疗,包括 CLI 的主要截肢和血运重建。