School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester and Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, UK.
School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK.
Physiother Theory Pract. 2024 Oct;40(10):2241-2255. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2023.2247069. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
During the Coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic, physiotherapists changed rapidly to working remotely. Research demonstrates the benefits of remote physiotherapy, but little is known about its implementation in practice.
Explore the take-up and delivery of remote physiotherapy during the pandemic in the United Kingdom.
Sequential mixed methods evaluation with physiotherapists leading remote physiotherapy delivery. Two-stage approach included online survey (2020) and semi-structured interviews with documentary/data analysis (2021).
There were 1620 physiotherapists who completed the survey. The most used devices were telephone ( = 942,71.0%) and the AttendAnywhere platform ( = 511, 38.5%). Remote consultations were frequently used for initial assessment ( = 1105, 83%), screening/triage ( = 882, 67%), or to review, monitor, and progress treatment ( = 982-1004, 74%-76%). Qualitative survey responses reflected respondents' response to COVID-19 and delivery of remote physiotherapy. Twelve remote physiotherapy leads were then purposively sampled across clinical areas. Three main themes emerged from interviews: response to Covid-19, delivery of remote physiotherapy, and future of remote physiotherapy.
Remote physiotherapy was safe, feasible, and acceptable for those who accessed it. There were patients for which it was deemed unsuitable across clinical areas. In practice, it should be combined with in-person consultation based on patients' needs/preferences. Further research should explore post-pandemic maintenance of remote delivery.
在冠状病毒(Covid-19)大流行期间,物理治疗师迅速转变为远程工作。研究表明远程物理治疗的好处,但对其实践中的实施情况知之甚少。
探索英国大流行期间远程物理治疗的采用和实施情况。
采用具有领导远程物理治疗服务能力的物理治疗师的顺序混合方法评估。两阶段方法包括在线调查(2020 年)和半结构化访谈以及文档/数据分析(2021 年)。
共有 1620 名物理治疗师完成了调查。使用最多的设备是电话( = 942,71.0%)和 AttendAnywhere 平台( = 511,38.5%)。远程咨询常用于初始评估( = 1105,83%)、筛查/分诊( = 882,67%),或用于回顾、监测和推进治疗( = 982-1004,74%-76%)。定性调查回复反映了受访者对 COVID-19 的反应和远程物理治疗的实施情况。然后在临床领域内有针对性地选择了 12 名远程物理治疗负责人进行访谈。访谈中出现了三个主要主题:对 COVID-19 的反应、远程物理治疗的实施以及远程物理治疗的未来。
对于那些接受远程物理治疗的人来说,远程物理治疗是安全、可行且可接受的。在各个临床领域,都有不适合进行远程治疗的患者。在实践中,应根据患者的需求/偏好将其与面对面咨询相结合。进一步的研究应探讨大流行后远程治疗的维持情况。