Suppr超能文献

[养老院老年护理团队评估后直接入住急性老年病科的效用与安全性]

[Utility and safety of direct admission to acute geriatric unit after Nursing Home Geriatric Team assessment].

作者信息

Cristofori Giovanna, González Becerra Margarita, Sánchez Osorio Luisa María, Gómez Pavón Javier

机构信息

Hospital Central de la Cruz Roja San José y Santa Adela, Madrid, España.

Hospital Central de la Cruz Roja San José y Santa Adela, Madrid, España.

出版信息

Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 2023 Nov-Dec;58(6):101388. doi: 10.1016/j.regg.2023.101388. Epub 2023 Aug 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

More than half of institutionalized older people need a emergency department visit annually, with high resources consumption and higher risk of adverse events, due to high complexity. Direct admission to Acute Geriatric Unit (AGU), after geriatric consultant and nursing home medical team assessment, could be a safety and effective alternative to emergency department (ED) admission.

METHODS

Retrospective observational study of AGU patients admitted by Nursing Home Geriatric Team between January, 1st and December, 31st, 2021. Planned admissions and SARS-CoV-2 positive patients were excluded. Medical (sociodemographic, clinical, functional and cognitive) records and outcomes data (inpatient mortality, hospital and ED lenght of stay, transfer to ED and delirium within 48h after admission, hospital discharge location) were collected.

RESULTS

Two hundred and six patients directly admitted, 101 through ED (N 307). 62.5% with Barthel index <40, 65% with dementia, 56.4% with Charlson index ≥3. Inpatient mortality was 14.6% in direct admission, 20.8% in ED referral group, p=0.14. Hospital lenght of stay was 9.61±6.01 days in direct admission, 11.22±5.36 days in ED group, p=0.02. 27.7% of patients with delirium in direct admission and 36.6% in ED group; only one patient was transferred to ED, within 48h after admission.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct admission is a safety and effective alternative to ED referral in institutionalized older people after geriatric assessment, due to no increased mortality, shorter length of stay and hospital cost reduction.

摘要

背景与目的

超过半数的机构养老老年人每年需要前往急诊科就诊,由于病情复杂,资源消耗量大且不良事件风险更高。经老年科顾问和养老院医疗团队评估后,直接入住急性老年病科(AGU)可能是一种比入住急诊科(ED)更安全有效的选择。

方法

对养老院老年团队在2021年1月1日至12月31日期间收治的AGU患者进行回顾性观察研究。排除计划性入院患者和新冠病毒检测呈阳性的患者。收集医疗(社会人口统计学、临床、功能和认知)记录及结局数据(住院死亡率、住院时间和急诊科停留时间、入院后48小时内转至急诊科情况和谵妄情况、出院地点)。

结果

直接入院206例患者,通过急诊科入院101例(共307例)。62.5%的患者巴氏指数<40,65%患有痴呆症,56.4%的患者查尔森指数≥3。直接入院患者的住院死亡率为14.6%,急诊科转诊组为20.8%,p = 0.14。直接入院患者的住院时间为9.61±6.01天,急诊科组为11.22±5.36天,p = 0.02。直接入院患者中谵妄发生率为27.7%,急诊科组为36.6%;仅1例患者在入院后48小时内转至急诊科。

结论

经老年评估后,对于机构养老的老年人,直接入院是替代急诊科转诊的一种安全有效的选择,因为死亡率未增加、住院时间缩短且降低了医院成本。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验