• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替格瑞洛单药治疗对小血管冠状动脉疾病患者的临床意义:TICO随机试验结果

Clinical implication of ticagrelor monotherapy in patients with small vessel coronary artery disease: results from the TICO randomized trial.

作者信息

Cho Jae Young, Joo Donghyeon, Yun Kyeong Ho, Kim Byeong-Keuk, Hong Myeong-Ki, Jang Yangsoo, Oh Seok Kyu

机构信息

Departments of Cardiovascular Medicine, Regional Cardiocerebrovascular Center, Wonkwang University Hospital, Iksan, Republic of Korea.

Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Aug 8;10:1237826. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1237826. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2023.1237826
PMID:37614943
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10442835/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor monotherapy in patients with small vessel disease compared with ticagrelor-based DAPT within the Ticagrelor Monotherapy after 3 Months in the Patients Treated with New Generation Sirolimus Eluting Stent for Acute Coronary Syndrome (TICO) trial population.

METHODS

Reference vessel diameter ≤2.5 mm was considered as small vessel disease. We conducted a comparison of the incidence of target lesion failure (TLF) and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3 or 5 bleeding. TLF was defined as a composite of cardiac death, target lesion myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and target lesion revascularization.

RESULTS

652 patients among 3,056 TICO population (21.3%) had small vessel disease. Patients with small vessel disease showed a higher rate of TLF compared to those without small vessel disease (2.9% vs. 1.0%, log-rank  < 0.001). The presence of small vessel disease emerged as an independent predictor for 1-year TLF (HR 2.84, 95% CI 1.54-5.25), while it did not show a significant association with bleeding complications. The 12-month TLF rate was 1.6% for ticagrelor monotherapy after 3-month DAPT, and 4.2% for ticagrelor-based 12-month DAPT ( = 0.059) in patients with small vessel disease (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.14-1.04, for interaction = 0.261). The incidence of BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding rate 2.5% for ticagrelor monotherapy after 3-month DAPT, and 5.6% for ticagrelor-based 12-month DAPT ( = 0.052) in patients with small vessel disease (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.19-1.01, for interaction = 0.322). In the 3-month landmark analysis, ticagrelor monotherapy significantly reduced BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding in patients with small vessel disease (HR 0.09, 95% CI 0.01-0.69, log-rank  = 0.005) while demonstrating a similar incidence of TLF compared to ticagrelor based 12-month DAPT during the 3-12 months period.

CONCLUSIONS

There are no significant interactions between the antiplatelet strategy regarding the 12-month incidence of ischemic and bleeding complications. Ticagrelor monotherapy demonstrated a reduction in bleeding complications after a 3-month period of DAPT without increasing the rate of TLF, when compared to ticagrelor-based 12-month DAPT, specifically in patients with small vessel disease. : www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier, NCT02494895.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估新一代西罗莫司洗脱支架治疗急性冠状动脉综合征患者3个月后替格瑞洛单药治疗与基于替格瑞洛的双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)相比,在小血管疾病患者中的疗效和安全性。

方法

参考血管直径≤2.5毫米被视为小血管疾病。我们比较了靶病变失败(TLF)的发生率和出血学术研究联盟(BARC)3型或5型出血的发生率。TLF被定义为心脏死亡、靶病变心肌梗死、支架血栓形成和靶病变血运重建的复合事件。

结果

3056名TICO研究人群中有652名患者(21.3%)患有小血管疾病。与无小血管疾病的患者相比,患有小血管疾病的患者TLF发生率更高(2.9%对1.0%,对数秩检验<0.001)。小血管疾病的存在成为1年TLF的独立预测因素(风险比2.84,95%置信区间1.54 - 5.25),而它与出血并发症无显著关联。在患有小血管疾病的患者中,3个月DAPT后替格瑞洛单药治疗的12个月TLF率为1.6%,基于替格瑞洛的12个月DAPT为4.2%(P = 0.059)(风险比0.38,95%置信区间0.14 - 1.04,交互作用P = 0.261)。在患有小血管疾病的患者中,3个月DAPT后替格瑞洛单药治疗的BARC 3型或5型出血发生率为2.5%,基于替格瑞洛的12个月DAPT为5.6%(P = 0.052)(风险比0.44,95%置信区间0.19 - 1.01,交互作用P = 0.322)。在3个月的标志性分析中,替格瑞洛单药治疗显著降低了小血管疾病患者的BARC 3型或5型出血(风险比0.09,95%置信区间0.01 - 0.69,对数秩检验P = 0.005),同时在3 - 12个月期间与基于替格瑞洛的12个月DAPT相比,TLF发生率相似。

结论

关于缺血和出血并发症的12个月发生率,抗血小板策略之间没有显著的相互作用。与基于替格瑞洛的12个月DAPT相比,替格瑞洛单药治疗在3个月DAPT后显示出血并发症减少,且未增加TLF发生率,特别是在小血管疾病患者中。:www.ClinicalTrials.gov,标识符,NCT02494895

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c83/10442835/5c4c890c6b49/fcvm-10-1237826-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c83/10442835/2491ff43aaec/fcvm-10-1237826-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c83/10442835/5c4c890c6b49/fcvm-10-1237826-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c83/10442835/2491ff43aaec/fcvm-10-1237826-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c83/10442835/5c4c890c6b49/fcvm-10-1237826-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical implication of ticagrelor monotherapy in patients with small vessel coronary artery disease: results from the TICO randomized trial.替格瑞洛单药治疗对小血管冠状动脉疾病患者的临床意义:TICO随机试验结果
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Aug 8;10:1237826. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1237826. eCollection 2023.
2
Effect of Ticagrelor Monotherapy vs Ticagrelor With Aspirin on Major Bleeding and Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: The TICO Randomized Clinical Trial.替格瑞洛单药治疗与替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林治疗对急性冠状动脉综合征患者主要出血和心血管事件的影响:TICO 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2020 Jun 16;323(23):2407-2416. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.7580.
3
Ischemic and Bleeding Events of Ticagrelor Monotherapy in Korean Patients With and Without Diabetes Mellitus: Insights From the TICO Trial.替格瑞洛单药治疗在韩国糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者中的缺血及出血事件:来自TICO试验的见解
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Jan 14;11:620906. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.620906. eCollection 2020.
4
Randomized evaluation of ticagrelor monotherapy after 3-month dual-antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with new-generation sirolimus-eluting stents: TICO trial rationale and design.替卡格雷单药治疗在新一代西罗莫司洗脱支架治疗急性冠脉综合征患者 3 个月双联抗血小板治疗后的随机评估:TICO 试验的原理和设计。
Am Heart J. 2019 Jun;212:45-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.02.015. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
5
Body mass index affecting ticagrelor monotherapy vs. ticagrelor with aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A pre-specified sub-analysis of the TICO randomized trial.体重指数对急性冠脉综合征患者替格瑞洛单药治疗与替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林治疗的影响:TICO随机试验的一项预先设定的亚组分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Mar 30;10:1128834. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1128834. eCollection 2023.
6
Comparison of one-month versus twelve-month dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of drug-eluting stents guided by either intravascular ultrasound or angiography in patients with acute coronary syndrome: rationale and design of prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled IVUS-ACS and ULTIMATE-DAPT trial.比较血管内超声或血管造影指导下急性冠脉综合征患者药物洗脱支架植入术后 1 个月与 12 个月双联抗血小板治疗:前瞻性、多中心、随机、对照 IVUS-ACS 和 ULTIMATE-DAPT 试验的原理和设计。
Am Heart J. 2021 Jun;236:49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.02.014. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
7
Ticagrelor Monotherapy Versus Ticagrelor With Aspirin in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.替格瑞洛单药治疗与替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的疗效比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Feb 22;14(4):431-440. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.11.036.
8
Age-Dependent Effect of Ticagrelor Monotherapy Versus Ticagrelor With Aspirin on Major Bleeding and Cardiovascular Events: A Post Hoc Analysis of the TICO Randomized Trial.替格瑞洛单药治疗与替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林治疗与年龄相关的主要出血和心血管事件的影响:TICO 随机试验的事后分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Dec 21;10(24):e022700. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.022700. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
9
Ticagrelor Monotherapy After 3-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome by High Bleeding Risk: The Subanalysis From the TICO Trial.急性冠脉综合征高出血风险患者3个月双联抗血小板治疗后替格瑞洛单药治疗:TICO试验的亚组分析
Korean Circ J. 2022 Apr;52(4):324-337. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2021.0321. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
10
Sex Differences in Outcomes of Ticagrelor Therapy With or Without Aspirin After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Post Hoc Secondary Analysis of the TICO Randomized Clinical Trial.替格瑞洛联合或不联合阿司匹林治疗急性冠脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后结局的性别差异:随机临床试验 TICO 的事后二次分析。
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2023 Jun;43(6):e218-e226. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.122.318725. Epub 2023 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Reply to Letter to the Editor: "What Is the Optimal Antiplatelet Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients with Small Diameter Stents?".致编辑信件的回复:“2型糖尿病合并小直径支架患者的最佳抗血小板治疗方案是什么?”
Anatol J Cardiol. 2025 Jun 30;29(8):450-1. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2025.5348.

本文引用的文献

1
Body mass index affecting ticagrelor monotherapy vs. ticagrelor with aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A pre-specified sub-analysis of the TICO randomized trial.体重指数对急性冠脉综合征患者替格瑞洛单药治疗与替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林治疗的影响:TICO随机试验的一项预先设定的亚组分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Mar 30;10:1128834. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1128834. eCollection 2023.
2
Intravascular Imaging-Guided or Angiography-Guided Complex PCI.血管内影像学指导或血管造影指导下的复杂 PCI。
N Engl J Med. 2023 May 4;388(18):1668-1679. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2216607. Epub 2023 Mar 5.
3
Age-Dependent Effect of Ticagrelor Monotherapy Versus Ticagrelor With Aspirin on Major Bleeding and Cardiovascular Events: A Post Hoc Analysis of the TICO Randomized Trial.
替格瑞洛单药治疗与替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林治疗与年龄相关的主要出血和心血管事件的影响:TICO 随机试验的事后分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Dec 21;10(24):e022700. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.022700. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
4
Ticagrelor Monotherapy Versus Ticagrelor With Aspirin in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.替格瑞洛单药治疗与替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的疗效比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Feb 22;14(4):431-440. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.11.036.
5
Ischemic and Bleeding Events of Ticagrelor Monotherapy in Korean Patients With and Without Diabetes Mellitus: Insights From the TICO Trial.替格瑞洛单药治疗在韩国糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者中的缺血及出血事件:来自TICO试验的见解
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Jan 14;11:620906. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.620906. eCollection 2020.
6
Pharmacodynamic Comparison of Ticagrelor Monotherapy Versus Ticagrelor and Aspirin in Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The TEMPLATE (Ticagrelor Monotherapy and Platelet Reactivity) Randomized Controlled Trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后替格瑞洛单药治疗与替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林治疗患者的药效学比较: TEMPLATE(替格瑞洛单药治疗和血小板反应性)随机对照试验。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Dec 15;9(24):e016495. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.016495. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
7
Comparison of Ultrathin, Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents and Thin, Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Calcified or Small Vessel Lesions.超薄生物可吸收聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与薄型耐用聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架在钙化或小血管病变中的比较。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Sep;13(9):e009189. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009189. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
8
Effect of Ticagrelor Monotherapy vs Ticagrelor With Aspirin on Major Bleeding and Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: The TICO Randomized Clinical Trial.替格瑞洛单药治疗与替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林治疗对急性冠状动脉综合征患者主要出血和心血管事件的影响:TICO 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2020 Jun 16;323(23):2407-2416. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.7580.
9
Impact of stent diameter on outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention with second-generation drug-eluting stents: Results from a large single-center registry.支架直径对第二代药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后结局的影响:来自大型单中心注册研究的结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Sep 1;96(3):558-564. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28488. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
10
Randomized evaluation of ticagrelor monotherapy after 3-month dual-antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with new-generation sirolimus-eluting stents: TICO trial rationale and design.替卡格雷单药治疗在新一代西罗莫司洗脱支架治疗急性冠脉综合征患者 3 个月双联抗血小板治疗后的随机评估:TICO 试验的原理和设计。
Am Heart J. 2019 Jun;212:45-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.02.015. Epub 2019 Mar 7.