Suppr超能文献

参与基于价值的医疗保健的医疗体系的透析费用。

Dialysis costs for a health system participating in value-based care.

机构信息

Intermountain Kidney Services and Nephrology, Intermountain Healthcare, 5169 S Cottonwood St, Ste 320, Murray, UT 84107. Email:

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2023 Aug 1;29(8):e235-e241. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2023.89410.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Unplanned "crash" dialysis starts are associated with worse outcomes and higher costs, a challenging problem for health systems participating in value-based care (VBC). We examined expenditures and utilization associated with these events in a large health system.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective, single-center study at Cleveland Clinic, a large, integrated health system participating in VBC contracts, including a Medicare accountable care organization.

METHODS

We analyzed beneficiaries who transitioned to dialysis between 2017 and 2020. Crash starts involved initiating inpatient hemodialysis (HD) with a central venous catheter (CVC). Optimal starts were initiated with either home dialysis or outpatient HD without a CVC. Suboptimal starts were initiated with outpatient HD with a CVC or inpatient HD without a CVC.

RESULTS

A total of 495 patients initiated chronic dialysis: 260 crash starts, 130 optimal starts, and 105 suboptimal starts. Median predialysis 12-month cost was $67,059 for crash starts, $17,891 for optimal starts, and $7633 for suboptimal starts (P < .001). Median postdialysis 12-month cost was $71,992 for crash starts, $55,427 for optimal starts, and $72,032 for suboptimal starts (P = .001). Predialysis inpatient admission per 1000 beneficiaries was 1236 per 1000 for crash starts vs 273 per 1000 for optimal starts and 170 per 1000 for suboptimal starts (P < .001). Postdialysis inpatient admission for crash starts was 853 per 1000 vs 291 per 1000 for optimal starts and 184 per 1000 for suboptimal starts (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In a major health system, crash starts demonstrated the highest cost and hospital utilization, a pattern that persisted after dialysis initiation. Developing strategies to promote optimal starts will improve VBC contract performance.

摘要

目的

无计划的“紧急”透析开始与更差的结果和更高的成本相关,这对参与基于价值的护理(VBC)的医疗系统来说是一个具有挑战性的问题。我们在一个大型医疗系统中研究了这些事件相关的支出和利用情况。

研究设计

克利夫兰诊所的一项回顾性、单中心研究,克利夫兰诊所是一个大型的综合性医疗系统,参与了 VBC 合同,包括一个医疗保险责任医疗组织。

方法

我们分析了 2017 年至 2020 年期间转为透析的受益人的数据。紧急开始涉及使用中央静脉导管(CVC)开始住院血液透析(HD)。最佳开始是通过家庭透析或无 CVC 的门诊 HD 开始。次优开始是通过带 CVC 的门诊 HD 或无 CVC 的住院 HD 开始。

结果

共有 495 名患者开始接受慢性透析:260 例紧急开始,130 例最佳开始,105 例次优开始。紧急开始的透析前 12 个月中位费用为 67059 美元,最佳开始的费用为 17891 美元,次优开始的费用为 7633 美元(P<0.001)。紧急开始的透析后 12 个月中位费用为 71992 美元,最佳开始的费用为 55427 美元,次优开始的费用为 72032 美元(P=0.001)。紧急开始的每 1000 名受益人的透析前住院入院率为 1236 人,最佳开始的为 273 人,次优开始的为 170 人(P<0.001)。紧急开始的透析后住院入院率为 853 人,最佳开始的为 291 人,次优开始的为 184 人(P<0.001)。

结论

在一个主要的医疗系统中,紧急开始的成本和医院利用率最高,这种模式在开始透析后仍然存在。制定促进最佳开始的策略将改善 VBC 合同的绩效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验