Suppr超能文献

黏膜瓣可防止额部钻孔术后新骨形成:一项计算机辅助研究。

Mucosal flaps prevent neo-osteogenesis after frontal drill-out procedures: A computer-assisted study.

作者信息

Ye Ting, Zhou Bing, Li Cheng, Zhang Xiaoqing, Shao Yameng, Huang Qian, Cui Shunjiu

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing China.

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education Beijing China.

出版信息

Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2023 Jun 24;8(4):816-823. doi: 10.1002/lio2.1104. eCollection 2023 Aug.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Although several mucosal flap techniques have been reported to improve the outcomes in Draf IIb and Draf III procedures, there is scant knowledge on frontal ostium neo-osteogenesis after reconstruction with mucosa flap. This study evaluates the potential benefits of mucosa flaps on frontal ostium neo-osteogenesis after frontal sinus drill-out procedures.

METHODS

Forty-three patients who underwent extended Draf IIb and Draf III were enrolled. Among them, 20 patients had frontal neo-ostium (FNO) reconstructed by mucosal flap (group A), and 23 patients did not have neo-ostium reconstruction (group B). The cross-sectional area of FNO, frontonasal bone, and the amount of frontal neo-osteogenesis (FNOG) were measured with OsiriX®. In addition, the Global Osteitis Scoring Scale (GOSS), Lund-Mackay score (LMS), and Lund-Kennedy score (LKS) were also evaluated.

RESULTS

At one year postoperatively, the remaining neo-ostium area was significantly larger in group A ( = .001), and group A had significantly less FNOG ( < .05). The month 12 postoperative GOSS score was significantly decreased in group A. In contrast, it slightly increased in group B. Both the average LKS and LMS were significantly reduced in groups A and B at month 12 postoperatively. Still, the average LKS of group A significantly decreased than that of group B at month 12 postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Coverage of the bare frontal bone with the mucosal flap could prevent excessive neo-osteogenesis and keep the neo-ostium open widely.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2b.

摘要

目的

尽管已有多种黏膜瓣技术被报道可改善Draf IIb和Draf III手术的效果,但关于黏膜瓣重建后额窦口新骨形成的知识却知之甚少。本研究评估黏膜瓣在额窦钻孔术后对额窦口新骨形成的潜在益处。

方法

纳入43例行扩大Draf IIb和Draf III手术的患者。其中,20例患者采用黏膜瓣重建额窦新口(A组),23例患者未进行新口重建(B组)。使用OsiriX®测量额窦新口(FNO)、额鼻骨的横截面积以及额窦新骨形成量(FNOG)。此外,还评估了全球骨炎评分量表(GOSS)、Lund-Mackay评分(LMS)和Lund-Kennedy评分(LKS)。

结果

术后1年,A组剩余新口面积显著更大(P = 0.001),且A组的FNOG显著更少(P < 0.05)。术后12个月时,A组的GOSS评分显著降低。相比之下,B组略有升高。术后12个月时,A组和B组的平均LKS和LMS均显著降低。不过,术后12个月时A组的平均LKS显著低于B组。

结论

用黏膜瓣覆盖裸露的额骨可防止过度的新骨形成并保持新口广泛开放。

证据级别

2b。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/378d/10446252/d8aa34e9155e/LIO2-8-816-g004.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验