Kavsak Peter A, Sharif Sameer, Globe Isabella, Ainsworth Craig, Ma Jinhui, McQueen Matthew, Mehta Shamir, Ko Dennis T, Worster Andrew
Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada.
Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada.
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Aug 4;10(8):335. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10080335.
Serial cardiac troponin (cTn) testing on patients with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is primarily to identify those patients with evolving myocardial injury. With the improved analytical performance of the high-sensitivity cTn (hs-cTn) assays, different change criteria have been proposed that are mostly assay dependent. Here, we developed and compared a new Common Change Criteria (3C for the combined criteria of >3 ng/L, >30%, or >15% based on the initial cTn concentration of <10 ng/L, 10 to 100 ng/L, or >100 ng/L, respectively) method, versus the 2 h assay-dependent absolute change criteria endorsed by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), versus the common relative >20% change criterion. These different analytical change criteria were evaluated in 855 emergency department (ED) patients with symptoms of ACS and who had two samples collected 3 h apart. The cTn concentrations were measured with four different assays (Abbott hs-cTnI, Roche hs-cTnT, Ortho cTnI-ES, and Ortho hs-cTnI). The outcomes evaluated were myocardial infarction (MI) and a composite outcome (MI, unstable angina, ventricular arrhythmia, heart failure, or cardiovascular death) within 7 days of ED presentation. The combined change criteria (3C) method yielded higher specificities (range: 93.9 to 97.2%) as compared to the >20% criterion (range: 42.3 to 88.1%) for all four assays for MI. The 3C method only yielded a higher specificity estimate for MI for the cTnI-ES assay (95.9%) versus the absolute change criteria (71.7%). Similar estimates were obtained for the composite outcome. There was also substantial agreement between hs-cTnT and the different cTnI assays for MI with the 3C method, with the percent agreement being ≥95%. The Common Change Criteria (3C) method combining both absolute and different percent changes may be used with cTnI, hs-cTnT, and different hs-cTnI assays to yield similar high-specificity (rule-in) estimates for adverse cardiovascular events for patients presenting to the ED with ACS symptoms.
对有急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)症状的患者进行连续心肌肌钙蛋白(cTn)检测,主要是为了识别那些有进展性心肌损伤的患者。随着高敏cTn(hs-cTn)检测分析性能的提高,已经提出了不同的变化标准,这些标准大多依赖于检测方法。在此,我们开发并比较了一种新的通用变化标准(3C,即根据初始cTn浓度分别<10 ng/L、10至100 ng/L或>100 ng/L,联合标准为>3 ng/L、>30%或>15%)方法,与欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)认可的2小时检测方法依赖的绝对变化标准,以及常见的相对>20%变化标准。在855例有ACS症状且在急诊科(ED)就诊、间隔3小时采集两份样本的患者中,对这些不同的分析变化标准进行了评估。使用四种不同的检测方法(雅培hs-cTnI、罗氏hs-cTnT、奥森cTnI-ES和奥森hs-cTnI)测量cTn浓度。评估的结局为ED就诊后7天内的心肌梗死(MI)和复合结局(MI、不稳定型心绞痛、室性心律失常、心力衰竭或心血管死亡)。与MI的所有四种检测方法的>20%标准(范围:42.3%至88.1%)相比,联合变化标准(3C)方法产生了更高的特异性(范围:93.9%至97.2%)。对于cTnI-ES检测,3C方法仅对MI产生了比绝对变化标准(71.7%)更高的特异性估计(95.9%)。对于复合结局也获得了类似的估计。使用3C方法时,hs-cTnT与不同的cTnI检测方法在MI方面也有高度一致性,一致率≥95%。结合绝对变化和不同百分比变化的通用变化标准(3C)方法可与cTnI、hs-cTnT和不同的hs-cTnI检测方法一起使用,为有ACS症状到ED就诊的患者的不良心血管事件产生类似的高特异性(纳入)估计。