Foroughi Olivia, Madraswala Shaheen, Hayes Jennifer, Glover Kara, Lee Liam, Chaki Moumita, Redpath Stella, Yu Agnes Weixuan, Chiu David, Amanti Kristen Garner, Gustavsen Gary
Health Advances LLC, Newton, MA 02466, USA.
AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD 20878, USA.
J Pers Med. 2023 Aug 3;13(8):1228. doi: 10.3390/jpm13081228.
Despite the OlympiA trial demonstrating that early-stage, high-risk, HER2- germline and mutation (g) positive breast cancer patients can benefit from PARPi in the adjuvant setting, the g testing rate in early-stage HR+/HER2- patients remains suboptimal compared to that in early-stage TNBC patients. To better understand the perceived barriers associated with g testing in HR+/HER2- disease, a quantitative survey was conducted across stakeholders ( = 430) including medical oncologists, surgeons, nurses, physician assistants, payers, and patients. This study revealed that while payers claim to cover g testing, poor clinician documentation and overutilization are key challenges. Therefore, payers place utilization management controls on g testing due to their impression that clinicians overtest. These controls have led to healthcare professionals experiencing payer pushback in the form of reimbursement limitations and denials. The perceived challenges to g testing stem from the lack of consensus dictating which patients are high risk and should be tested. While payers define high risk based on the CPS + EG score from the OlympiA trial, HCPs adopt a broader definition including genomic risk scores, lymph node involvement, and tumor grade and size. A dialogue to harmonize risk classification and testing eligibility across stakeholders is critical to address this disconnect and increase g testing in appropriate patients.
尽管OlympiA试验表明,早期、高危、HER2基因和突变(g)阳性的乳腺癌患者在辅助治疗中可从PARPi中获益,但与早期三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)患者相比,早期激素受体阳性(HR+)/人表皮生长因子受体2阴性(HER2-)患者的g检测率仍不理想。为了更好地了解HR+/HER2-疾病中与g检测相关的感知障碍,我们对包括医学肿瘤学家、外科医生、护士、医师助理、支付方和患者在内的利益相关者(n = 430)进行了一项定量调查。这项研究表明,虽然支付方声称涵盖g检测,但临床医生记录不佳和检测过度是关键挑战。因此,支付方基于他们认为临床医生检测过度的印象,对g检测实施了利用管理控制。这些控制导致医疗保健专业人员在报销限制和拒绝方面遭到支付方的抵制。g检测的感知挑战源于缺乏关于哪些患者属于高风险且应接受检测的共识。虽然支付方根据OlympiA试验中的CPS + EG评分来定义高风险,但医疗保健提供者采用了更广泛的定义,包括基因组风险评分、淋巴结受累情况以及肿瘤分级和大小。在各利益相关者之间开展对话,以协调风险分类和检测资格,对于解决这一脱节问题并增加对合适患者的g检测至关重要。