Suppr超能文献

利用全身免疫炎症指数和血液生物标志物与难治性双相抑郁患者治疗反应的相关性

Utilizing the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index and Blood-Based Biomarkers in Association with Treatment Responsiveness amongst Patients with Treatment-Resistant Bipolar Depression.

作者信息

Decker Kyle, Murata Stephen, Baig Nausheen, Hasan Sakibur, Halaris Angelos

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL 60153, USA.

Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University, Maywood, IL 60153, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2023 Aug 10;13(8):1245. doi: 10.3390/jpm13081245.

Abstract

(1) Background: Inflammation is associated with depressive illness and treatment resistance. This study assessed a novel inflammatory index, the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII), in patients diagnosed with treatment-resistant bipolar depression (TRBDD) before and after treatment with escitalopram (ESC) and celecoxib (CBX) add-on or ESC and placebo (PBO), and compared them to healthy control (HC) subjects. (2) Methods: This is a secondary biological analysis from a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial of CBX augmentation in TRBDD. Our subsample with available complete blood count (CBC) data included 52 TRBDD subjects, randomized into an ESC + CBX, ( = 29), an ESC + PBO arm ( = 23), and an HC group ( = 32). SII was calculated from the CBC with differential (SII = platelets x neutrophils/lymphocytes) at baseline and end of treatment (8 weeks). Blood inflammation biomarkers, growth factors, and kynurenine metabolites were determined at both timepoints. Depressive symptom severity was the primary outcome, using the HAMD-17 rating scale score to quantitate treatment response and remission rates. (3) Results: Baseline SII did not discriminate TRBDD from HC, nor was it associated with HAMD-17 score at any timepoint, although it was significantly associated with lower baseline VEGF ( = 0.011) and higher week 8 levels of IL1-β ( = 0.03) and CRP ( = 0.048). Post-treatment HAMD-17 was not independently predicted using baseline SII unless an interaction with age was present ( = 0.003 was included), even after relevant adjustments. A similar effect was seen with baseline neutrophils. (4) Conclusions: While SII was not an independent predictor of treatment outcome, elevated baseline SII was a predictor of poor treatment response amongst older patients with TRBDD.

摘要

(1) 背景:炎症与抑郁症及治疗抵抗相关。本研究评估了一种新型炎症指标——全身免疫炎症指数(SII),该指标用于诊断为伴有艾司西酞普兰(ESC)和塞来昔布(CBX)联合治疗或ESC与安慰剂(PBO)治疗前后的难治性双相抑郁症(TRBDD)患者,并将其与健康对照(HC)受试者进行比较。(2) 方法:这是一项关于CBX增强治疗TRBDD的双盲随机安慰剂对照试验的二次生物学分析。我们具有可用全血细胞计数(CBC)数据的子样本包括52名TRBDD受试者,随机分为ESC + CBX组(n = 29)、ESC + PBO组(n = 23)和HC组(n = 32)。在基线和治疗结束时(8周)根据CBC及分类计数计算SII(SII = 血小板×中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞)。在两个时间点均测定血液炎症生物标志物、生长因子和犬尿氨酸代谢产物。以抑郁症状严重程度作为主要结局,使用汉密尔顿抑郁量表-17(HAMD-17)评分量表得分来量化治疗反应和缓解率。(3) 结果:基线SII无法区分TRBDD与HC,且在任何时间点均与HAMD-17评分无关,尽管它与较低的基线血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)显著相关(P = 0.011),且与第8周较高水平的白细胞介素-1β(IL1-β,P = 0.03)和C反应蛋白(CRP,P = 0.048)相关。除非存在与年龄的交互作用(纳入P = 0.003),即使进行了相关调整,基线SII也不能独立预测治疗后HAMD-17评分。基线中性粒细胞也有类似的效应。(4) 结论:虽然SII不是治疗结局的独立预测指标,但基线SII升高是老年TRBDD患者治疗反应不佳的预测指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b602/10455950/433792fba394/jpm-13-01245-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验