Aklepi Gabriela, Manolovitz Brian, Robayo Linda E, Sarafraz Amin, Blandino Carlos Francisco, Arwari Brian, Sobczak Evie, Bass Danielle, Ghamasaee Pardis, Bolaños Saavedra Ana, Samano Daniel, Massad Nina, Kottapally Mohan, Merenda Amedeo, Dib Salim, Dietrich W Dalton, Rundek Tatjana, O'Phelan Kristine H, Claassen Jan, Walker Mark F, Alkhachroum Ayham
Department of Neurology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA.
Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, Florida, USA.
J Neurotrauma. 2024 Mar;41(5-6):646-659. doi: 10.1089/neu.2023.0188. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
Eye tracking assessments are clinician dependent and can contribute to misclassification of coma. We investigated responsiveness to videos with and without audio in traumatic brain injury (TBI) subjects using video eye-tracking (VET). We recruited 20 healthy volunteers and 10 unresponsive TBI subjects. Clinicians were surveyed whether the subject was tracking on their bedside assessment. The Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) was also performed. Eye movements in response to three different 30-second videos with and without sound were recorded using VET. The videos consisted of moving characters (a dancer, a person skateboarding, and Spiderman). Tracking on VET was defined as visual fixation on the character and gaze movement in the same direction of the character on two separate occasions. Subjects were classified as "covert tracking" (tracking using VET only), "overt tracking" (VET and clinical exam by clinicians), and "no tracking". A k-nearest-neighbors model was also used to identify tracking computationally. Thalamocortical connectivity and structural integrity were evaluated with EEG and MRI. The ability to obey commands was evaluated at 6- and 12-month follow-up. The average age was 29 (± 17) years old. Three subjects demonstrated "covert tracking" (CRS-R of 6, 8, 7), two "overt tracking" (CRS-R 22, 11), and five subjects "no tracking" (CRS-R 8, 6, 5, 6, 7). Among the 84 tested trials in all subjects, 11 trials (13%) met the criteria for "covert tracking". Using the k-nearest approach, 14 trials (17%) were classified as "covert tracking". Subjects with "tracking" had higher thalamocortical connectivity, and had fewer structures injured in the eye-tracking network than those without tracking. At follow-up, 2 out of 3 "covert" and all "overt" subjects recovered consciousness versus only 2 subjects in the "no tracking" group. Immersive stimuli may serve as important objective tools to differentiate subtle tracking using VET.
眼动追踪评估依赖于临床医生,可能导致昏迷的错误分类。我们使用视频眼动追踪(VET)研究了创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者对有无音频视频的反应。我们招募了20名健康志愿者和10名无反应的TBI患者。调查临床医生受试者在床边评估时是否有追踪行为。还进行了昏迷恢复量表修订版(CRS-R)评估。使用VET记录对三个不同的30秒有声和无声视频的眼动。视频中有移动的角色(一名舞者、一名滑板者和蜘蛛侠)。VET上的追踪定义为在两个不同场合对角色的视觉注视以及与角色相同方向的注视移动。受试者被分类为“隐蔽追踪”(仅使用VET追踪)、“公开追踪”(VET和临床医生的临床检查)和“无追踪”。还使用k近邻模型通过计算识别追踪。通过脑电图和磁共振成像评估丘脑皮质连接性和结构完整性。在6个月和12个月的随访中评估服从指令的能力。平均年龄为29(±17)岁。三名受试者表现出“隐蔽追踪”(CRS-R分别为6、8、7),两名“公开追踪”(CRS-R分别为22、11),五名受试者“无追踪”(CRS-R分别为8、6、5、6、7)。在所有受试者的84次测试试验中,11次试验(13%)符合“隐蔽追踪”标准。使用k近邻方法,14次试验(17%)被分类为“隐蔽追踪”。有“追踪”的受试者丘脑皮质连接性更高,与无追踪的受试者相比,眼动追踪网络中受损的结构更少。在随访中,3名“隐蔽”受试者中的2名和所有“公开”受试者恢复了意识,而“无追踪”组中只有2名受试者恢复意识。沉浸式刺激可能是使用VET区分细微追踪的重要客观工具。