• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

IV期结直肠癌转移灶切除术后监测的成本效益

Cost-Effectiveness of Surveillance after Metastasectomy of Stage IV Colorectal Cancer.

作者信息

Ding Philip Q, Au Flora, Cheung Winson Y, Heitman Steven J, Lee-Ying Richard

机构信息

Oncology Outcomes Program, Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada.

Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2023 Aug 16;15(16):4121. doi: 10.3390/cancers15164121.

DOI:10.3390/cancers15164121
PMID:37627149
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10452589/
Abstract

Surveillance of stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC) after curative-intent metastasectomy can be effective for detecting asymptomatic recurrence. Guidelines for various forms of surveillance exist but are supported by limited evidence. We aimed to determine the most cost-effective strategy for surveillance following curative-intent metastasectomy of stage IV CRC. We performed a decision analysis to compare four active surveillance strategies involving clinic visits and investigations elicited from National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommendations. Markov model inputs included data from a population-based cohort and literature-derived costs, utilities, and probabilities. The primary outcomes were costs (2021 Canadian dollars) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. Over a 10-year base-case time horizon, surveillance with follow-ups every 12 months for 5 years was most economically favourable at a willingness-to-pay threshold of CAD 50,000 per QALY. These patterns were generally robust in the sensitivity analysis. A more intensive surveillance strategy was only favourable with a much higher willingness-to-pay threshold of approximately CAD 425,000 per QALY, with follow-ups every 3 months for 2 years then every 12 months for 3 additional years. Our findings are consistent with NCCN guidelines and justify the need for additional research to determine the impact of surveillance on CRC outcomes.

摘要

对IV期结直肠癌(CRC)进行根治性转移灶切除术后的监测,对于检测无症状复发可能是有效的。目前存在各种形式监测的指南,但证据有限。我们旨在确定IV期CRC根治性转移灶切除术后最具成本效益的监测策略。我们进行了一项决策分析,以比较四种积极监测策略,这些策略涉及从美国国立综合癌症网络(NCCN)指南中得出的临床就诊和检查。马尔可夫模型的输入数据包括来自基于人群队列的数据以及文献得出的成本、效用和概率。主要结局是成本(2021年加拿大元)和获得的质量调整生命年(QALY)。在10年的基础病例时间范围内,每12个月随访一次、持续5年的监测在每QALY支付意愿阈值为50,000加元时最具经济优势。这些模式在敏感性分析中总体上是稳健的。只有在每QALY支付意愿阈值约为425,000加元时,一种更密集的监测策略才具有优势,即每3个月随访2年,然后每12个月再随访3年。我们的研究结果与NCCN指南一致,并证明有必要进行更多研究以确定监测对CRC结局的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa02/10452589/61fdc2543357/cancers-15-04121-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa02/10452589/c822f947877a/cancers-15-04121-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa02/10452589/3050a9e91819/cancers-15-04121-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa02/10452589/f464362ee703/cancers-15-04121-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa02/10452589/61fdc2543357/cancers-15-04121-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa02/10452589/c822f947877a/cancers-15-04121-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa02/10452589/3050a9e91819/cancers-15-04121-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa02/10452589/f464362ee703/cancers-15-04121-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa02/10452589/61fdc2543357/cancers-15-04121-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness of Surveillance after Metastasectomy of Stage IV Colorectal Cancer.IV期结直肠癌转移灶切除术后监测的成本效益
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Aug 16;15(16):4121. doi: 10.3390/cancers15164121.
2
A randomised controlled trial to assess the cost-effectiveness of intensive versus no scheduled follow-up in patients who have undergone resection for colorectal cancer with curative intent.一项随机对照试验,旨在评估对有治愈意图的结直肠癌切除术后患者进行强化随访与非定期随访的成本效益。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 May;21(32):1-86. doi: 10.3310/hta21320.
3
Cost-effectiveness of hepatic metastasectomy in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma: a state-transition Monte Carlo decision analysis.转移性结直肠癌患者肝转移瘤切除术的成本效益:一种状态转换蒙特卡洛决策分析
Ann Surg. 2003 Apr;237(4):544-55. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000059989.55280.33.
4
Testing strategies for Lynch syndrome in people with endometrial cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.林奇综合征相关子宫内膜癌检测策略的系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Jun;25(42):1-216. doi: 10.3310/hta25420.
5
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.卡莫司汀植入剂与替莫唑胺治疗新诊断的高级别胶质瘤的有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450.
6
Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of colorectal cancer screenings in a low- and middle-income country: example from Thailand.在中低收入国家进行结直肠癌筛查的成本效益和预算影响分析:来自泰国的例子。
J Med Econ. 2019 Dec;22(12):1351-1361. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1674065. Epub 2019 Oct 12.
7
Health and Economic Impact of Intensive Surveillance for Distant Recurrence After Curative Treatment of Colon Cancer: A Mathematical Modeling Study.根治性治疗结肠癌后强化监测远处复发的健康和经济影响:一项数学建模研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Jul;62(7):872-881. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001364.
8
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的临床疗效与成本效益:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(45):1-141, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10450.
9
Multi-gene Pharmacogenomic Testing That Includes Decision-Support Tools to Guide Medication Selection for Major Depression: A Health Technology Assessment.多基因药物基因组学检测,包括用于指导抗抑郁药物选择的决策支持工具:一项卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2021 Aug 12;21(13):1-214. eCollection 2021.
10
Surveillance for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia following molar pregnancy: a cost-effectiveness analysis.随访葡萄胎妊娠后妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤:成本效益分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Nov;225(5):513.e1-513.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.05.031. Epub 2021 May 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Health Technology Assessment Process for Oncology Drugs: Impact of CADTH Changes on Public Payer Reimbursement Recommendations.肿瘤药物的卫生技术评估过程:加拿大药品和卫生技术局(CADTH)的变化对公共支付方报销建议的影响
Curr Oncol. 2022 Mar 1;29(3):1514-1526. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29030127.
2
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations.2022 年健康经济评估报告标准(CHEERS 2022)声明:健康经济评估报告的更新指南。
BMC Med. 2022 Jan 12;20(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-02204-0.
3
The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Surveillance and Survivorship Care of Patients After Curative Treatment of Colon and Rectal Cancer.
美国结肠和直肠外科医师协会关于结肠癌和直肠癌根治性治疗后患者监测与生存护理的临床实践指南。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2021 May;64(5):517-533. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001984.
4
NCCN Guidelines Insights: Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Version 2.2021.NCCN 指南解读:急性髓系白血病,第 2.2021 版。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 Jan 6;19(1):16-27. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0002.
5
Localised colon cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.局限性结肠癌:ESMO 诊断、治疗及随访临床实践指南
Ann Oncol. 2020 Oct;31(10):1291-1305. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.06.022. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
6
Comparison of Treatment, Cost, and Survival in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Western Washington, United States, and British Columbia, Canada.美国华盛顿州西部和加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省转移性结直肠癌患者的治疗、费用和生存比较。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2020 May;16(5):e425-e432. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00719. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
7
Rectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.直肠癌:欧洲肿瘤内科学会临床实践指南之诊断、治疗及随访
Ann Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;28(suppl_4):iv22-iv40. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx224.
8
A systematic review of patient perspectives on surveillance after colorectal cancer treatment.对患者关于结直肠癌治疗后监测观点的系统评价。
J Cancer Surviv. 2017 Oct;11(5):542-552. doi: 10.1007/s11764-017-0623-2. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
9
A Comparison of Survival by Site of Metastatic Resection in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.转移性结直肠癌转移灶切除部位与生存率的比较
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2017 Jun;16(2):e23-e28. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2016.07.018. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
10
Systematic review of health state utility values for economic evaluation of colorectal cancer.用于结直肠癌经济评价的健康状态效用值的系统评价。
Health Econ Rev. 2016 Dec;6(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13561-016-0115-5. Epub 2016 Aug 19.