Caracciolo Matteo, Castello Angelo, Urso Luca, Borgia Francesca, Marzola Maria Cristina, Uccelli Licia, Cittanti Corrado, Bartolomei Mirco, Castellani Massimo, Lopci Egesta
Nuclear Medicine Unit, Oncological Medical and Specialists Department, University Hospital of Ferrara, 44124 Ferrara, Italy.
Nuclear Medicine Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 17;12(16):5355. doi: 10.3390/jcm12165355.
The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of [F]FDG PET/CT and breast MRI for primary breast cancer (BC) response assessment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and to evaluate future perspectives in this setting. We performed a critical review using three bibliographic databases (i.e., PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) for articles published up to the 6 June 2023, starting from 2012. The Quality Assessment of Diagnosis Accuracy Study (QUADAS-2) tool was adopted to evaluate the risk of bias. A total of 76 studies were identified and screened, while 14 articles were included in our systematic review after a full-text assessment. The total number of patients included was 842. Eight out of fourteen studies (57.1%) were prospective, while all except one study were conducted in a single center. In the majority of the included studies (71.4%), 3.0 Tesla (T) MRI scans were adopted. Three out of fourteen studies (21.4%) used both 1.5 and 3.0 T MRI and only two used 1.5 T. [F]FDG was the radiotracer used in every study included. All patients accepted surgical treatment after NAC and each study used pathological complete response (pCR) as the reference standard. Some of the studies have demonstrated the superiority of [F]FDG PET/CT, while others proved that MRI was superior to PET/CT. Recent studies indicate that PET/CT has a better specificity, while MRI has a superior sensitivity for assessing pCR in BC patients after NAC. The complementary value of the combined use of these modalities represents probably the most important tool to improve diagnostic performance in this setting. Overall, larger prospective studies, possibly randomized, are needed, hopefully evaluating PET/MR and allowing for new tools, such as radiomic parameters, to find a proper place in the setting of BC patients undergoing NAC.
本系统评价的目的是研究[F]FDG PET/CT和乳腺MRI对新辅助化疗(NAC)后原发性乳腺癌(BC)反应评估的诊断准确性,并评估该背景下的未来前景。我们使用三个文献数据库(即PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science)对2012年至2023年6月6日发表的文章进行了严格审查。采用诊断准确性研究质量评估(QUADAS-2)工具评估偏倚风险。共识别和筛选了76项研究,经过全文评估后,有14篇文章纳入我们的系统评价。纳入的患者总数为842例。14项研究中有8项(57.1%)为前瞻性研究,除一项研究外,所有研究均在单一中心进行。在大多数纳入研究(71.4%)中,采用了3.0特斯拉(T)的MRI扫描。14项研究中有3项(21.4%)同时使用了1.5 T和3.0 T MRI,只有2项使用了1.5 T。[F]FDG是纳入的每项研究中使用的放射性示踪剂。所有患者在NAC后均接受了手术治疗,每项研究均将病理完全缓解(pCR)作为参考标准。一些研究证明了[F]FDG PET/CT的优越性,而另一些研究则证明MRI优于PET/CT。最近的研究表明,PET/CT在评估NAC后BC患者的pCR方面具有更好的特异性,而MRI具有更高的敏感性。联合使用这些检查方法的互补价值可能是提高该背景下诊断性能的最重要工具。总体而言,需要进行更大规模的前瞻性研究,可能是随机研究,希望能评估PET/MR,并让新的工具,如放射组学参数,在接受NAC的BC患者背景中找到合适的位置。