Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (M. Szarek, G.G.S.).
CPC Clinical Research, Aurora, CO (M. Szarek).
Circulation. 2024 Jan 16;149(3):192-203. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.066398. Epub 2023 Aug 26.
Lipoprotein(a) is a risk factor for cardiovascular events and modifies the benefit of PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9) inhibitors. Lipoprotein(a) concentration can be measured with immunoassays reporting mass or molar concentration or a reference measurement system using mass spectrometry. Whether the relationships between lipoprotein(a) concentrations and cardiovascular events in a high-risk cohort differ across lipoprotein(a) methods is unknown. We compared the prognostic and predictive value of these types of lipoprotein(a) tests for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).
The ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial (Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcomes After an Acute Coronary Syndrome During Treatment With Alirocumab) compared the PCSK9 inhibitor alirocumab with placebo in patients with recent acute coronary syndrome. We compared risk of a MACE in the placebo group and MACE risk reduction with alirocumab according to baseline lipoprotein(a) concentration measured by Siemens N-latex nephelometric immunoassay (IA-mass; mg/dL), Roche Tina-Quant turbidimetric immunoassay (IA-molar; nmol/L), and a noncommercial mass spectrometry-based test (MS; nmol/L). Lipoprotein(a) values were transformed into percentiles for comparative modeling. Natural cubic splines estimated continuous relationships between baseline lipoprotein(a) and outcomes in each treatment group. Event rates were also determined across baseline lipoprotein(a) quartiles defined by each assay.
Among 11 970 trial participants with results from all 3 tests, baseline median (Q1, Q3) lipoprotein(a) concentrations were 21.8 (6.9, 60.0) mg/dL, 45.0 (13.2, 153.8) nmol/L, and 42.2 (14.3, 143.1) nmol/L for IA-mass, IA-molar, and MS, respectively. The strongest correlation was between IA-molar and MS (r=0.990), with nominally weaker correlations between IA-mass and MS (r=0.967) and IA-mass and IA-molar (r=0.972). Relationships of lipoprotein(a) with MACE risk in the placebo group were nearly identical with each test, with estimated cumulative incidences differing by ≤0.4% across lipoprotein(a) percentiles, and all were incrementally prognostic after accounting for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (all spline ≤0.0003). Predicted alirocumab treatment effects were also nearly identical for each of the 3 tests, with estimated treatment hazard ratios differing by ≤0.07 between tests across percentiles and nominally less relative risk reduction by alirocumab at lower percentiles for all 3 tests. Absolute risk reduction with alirocumab increased with increasing lipoprotein(a) measured by each test, with significant linear trends across quartiles.
In patients with recent acute coronary syndrome, 3 lipoprotein(a) tests were similarly prognostic for MACE in the placebo group and predictive of MACE reductions with alirocumab at the cohort level.
URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01663402.
脂蛋白(a)是心血管事件的一个风险因素,并改变了 PCSK9(脯氨酸蛋白酶原转换酶枯草溶菌素/克氏菌 9)抑制剂的获益。脂蛋白(a)的浓度可以通过免疫测定法报告质量或摩尔浓度,或使用质谱的参考测量系统进行测量。在高风险队列中,不同脂蛋白(a)方法之间脂蛋白(a)浓度与心血管事件之间的关系是否不同尚不清楚。我们比较了这些类型的脂蛋白(a)检测对主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的预后和预测价值。
ODYSSEY OUTCOMES 试验(在急性冠状动脉综合征治疗期间用依洛尤单抗评估心血管结局)比较了 PCSK9 抑制剂依洛尤单抗与安慰剂在近期急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的疗效。我们比较了安慰剂组中 MACE 的风险以及依洛尤单抗降低 MACE 的风险,依据的是基线脂蛋白(a)浓度,该浓度由西门子 N- latex 免疫比浊法(IA-mass;mg/dL)、罗氏 Tina-Quant 免疫比浊法(IA-摩尔;nmol/L)和非商业的基于质谱的检测(MS;nmol/L)测量。脂蛋白(a)值被转换为百分位数进行比较建模。在每个治疗组中,自然三次样条估计了基线脂蛋白(a)与结局之间的连续关系。根据每个检测方法定义的基线脂蛋白(a)四分位数,还确定了事件发生率。
在 11970 名接受了所有 3 种检测的试验参与者中,基线中位数(Q1,Q3)脂蛋白(a)浓度分别为 21.8(6.9,60.0)mg/dL、45.0(13.2,153.8)nmol/L和 42.2(14.3,143.1)nmol/L,分别用于 IA-mass、IA-molar 和 MS。IA-molar 和 MS 之间的相关性最强(r=0.990),IA-mass 和 MS(r=0.967)以及 IA-mass 和 IA-molar(r=0.972)之间的相关性稍弱。在安慰剂组中,脂蛋白(a)与 MACE 风险的关系几乎相同,在每个检测中,累积发生率的差异在脂蛋白(a)百分位数之间不超过 0.4%,并且在考虑到低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平后,所有检测都具有递增的预后价值(所有样条 P<0.0003)。对于每种检测,依洛尤单抗的预测治疗效果也几乎相同,在每个检测中,在百分位数之间,依洛尤单抗的治疗风险比差异不超过 0.07,并且在所有 3 种检测中,依洛尤单抗的相对风险降低程度在较低的百分位数处名义上较低。依洛尤单抗的绝对风险降低随着每个检测测量的脂蛋白(a)的增加而增加,在四分位数之间存在显著的线性趋势。
在近期发生急性冠状动脉综合征的患者中,3 种脂蛋白(a)检测方法在安慰剂组中对 MACE 具有相似的预后价值,并对依洛尤单抗降低 MACE 的疗效具有预测价值。