• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测脊髓刺激的桨状导联置放时跳过椎板切开术的因素。

Predictors of Skip Laminotomy for Placement of Paddle Leads for Spinal Cord Stimulation.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA.

Department of Neurosurgery, Beaumont Neuroscience Center, Royal Oak, MI, USA.

出版信息

Neuromodulation. 2024 Jan;27(1):183-187. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2023.07.011. Epub 2023 Aug 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.neurom.2023.07.011
PMID:37632516
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Placement of a standard paddle lead for spinal cord stimulation (SCS) requires a laminotomy for positioning of the lead within the epidural space. During initial placement, an additional laminotomy or laminectomy, termed a "skip" laminotomy, may be necessary at a higher level to pass the lead to the appropriate midline position. Patient and radiographic factors that predict the need for a skip laminotomy have yet to be identified.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants who underwent SCS paddle placement at Albany Medical Center between 2016 and 2017 were identified. Operative reports were reviewed to identify the paddle type, level of initial laminotomy, target level, and skip laminotomy level. Preoperative thoracic magnetic resonance images (MRIs) were reviewed, and spinal canal diameter, interpedicular distance, and dorsal cerebral spinal fluid thickness were measured for each participant when available.

RESULTS

A total of 106 participants underwent thoracic SCS placement. Of these, 97 had thoracic MRIs available for review. Thirty-eight participants required a skip laminotomy for placement of the paddle compared with 68 participants who did not. There was no significant difference in demographic features including age, sex, body mass index, and surgical history. Univariate analyses that suggested trends were selected for further analysis using binary logistic regression. Level of initial laminotomy (odds ratio [OR] = 1.51, p = 0.028), spinal canal diameter (OR = 0.71, p = 0.015), and dorsal cerebrospinal fluid thickness (OR = 0.61, p = 0.011) were correlated with skip laminotomy. Target level (OR = 1.27, p = 0.138) and time from trial (1.01, p = 0.117) suggested potential association. The multivariate regression was statistically significant, X(10) = 28.02, p = 0.002. The model explained 38.3% of the variance (Nagelkerke R) and predicted skip laminectomy correctly in 73.3% of cases. However, for the multivariate regression, only a decrease in spinal canal diameter (OR = 0.59, p = 0.041) was associated with a greater odds of skip laminotomy.

CONCLUSIONS

This study aims to characterize the patient and radiographic factors that may predict the need to perform a skip laminotomy during the initial placement of SCS paddles. Here, we show that radiographic and anatomic variables, primarily spinal canal diameter, play an important role in predicting the need for a skip laminotomy. Furthermore, we suggest that target level for placement and level of initial laminotomy also may contribute. Further investigation of the predictive factors for performing a skip laminotomy would help optimize surgical planning and preoperative patient selection and counseling.

摘要

目的

脊髓刺激 (SCS) 的标准桨状导联的放置需要进行椎板切开术,以便将导联放置在硬膜外间隙内。在初始放置时,为了将导联传递到适当的中线位置,可能需要在更高的水平进行额外的椎板切开术或椎板切除术,称为“跳过”椎板切开术。预测需要进行“跳过”椎板切开术的患者和影像学因素尚未确定。

材料和方法

确定了 2016 年至 2017 年期间在奥尔巴尼医疗中心接受 SCS 桨状导联放置的参与者。回顾手术报告以确定桨状导联的类型、初始椎板切开术的水平、目标水平和“跳过”椎板切开术的水平。当有术前胸椎磁共振成像 (MRI) 时,回顾了每个参与者的椎管直径、椎间孔距离和背侧脑脊髓液厚度。

结果

共有 106 名参与者接受了胸椎 SCS 放置。其中,97 名参与者有可用的胸椎 MRI 进行审查。与 68 名未接受“跳过”椎板切开术的参与者相比,38 名参与者需要进行“跳过”椎板切开术以放置桨状导联。年龄、性别、体重指数和手术史等人口统计学特征无显著差异。单变量分析表明,初始椎板切开术水平(比值比 [OR] = 1.51,p = 0.028)、椎管直径(OR = 0.71,p = 0.015)和背侧脑脊髓液厚度(OR = 0.61,p = 0.011)与“跳过”椎板切开术相关。目标水平(OR = 1.27,p = 0.138)和试验时间(OR = 1.01,p = 0.117)提示可能存在关联。多元回归具有统计学意义,X(10) = 28.02,p = 0.002。该模型解释了 38.3%的方差(Nagelkerke R),并正确预测了 73.3%的“跳过”椎板切开术病例。然而,对于多元回归,只有椎管直径的减小(OR = 0.59,p = 0.041)与“跳过”椎板切开术的可能性更大相关。

结论

本研究旨在描述可能预测在初始放置 SCS 桨状导联时需要进行“跳过”椎板切开术的患者和影像学因素。在这里,我们表明,影像学和解剖学变量,主要是椎管直径,在预测“跳过”椎板切开术的需求方面起着重要作用。此外,我们建议目标放置水平和初始椎板切开术水平也可能有贡献。进一步研究“跳过”椎板切开术的预测因素将有助于优化手术计划和术前患者选择和咨询。

相似文献

1
Predictors of Skip Laminotomy for Placement of Paddle Leads for Spinal Cord Stimulation.预测脊髓刺激的桨状导联置放时跳过椎板切开术的因素。
Neuromodulation. 2024 Jan;27(1):183-187. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2023.07.011. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
2
Analysis of spinal canal diameter in the placement of thoracic spinal cord stimulator paddle leads.胸段脊髓刺激器电极置入时椎管直径分析。
Pain Pract. 2024 Jan;24(1):91-100. doi: 10.1111/papr.13289. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
3
Spinal Cord Stimulation Trial Electrodes Rapidly Produce Epidural Scarring, Impeding Surgical Paddle Lead Placement.脊髓刺激试验电极会迅速产生硬膜外瘢痕,阻碍手术片状电极的放置。
Neuromodulation. 2024 Aug;27(6):1090-1097. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2024.01.004. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
4
Spinal Cord Stimulator Paddle Lead Revision and Replacement for Misplaced or Displaced Electrodes.脊髓刺激器桨状导联的修正和更换,适用于电极错位或移位的情况。
World Neurosurg. 2024 Jun;186:e432-e439. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.03.154. Epub 2024 Mar 30.
5
The prospective evaluation of safety and success of a new method of introducing percutaneous paddle leads and complex arrays with an epidural access system.前瞻性评估一种新的经皮桨状导联和复杂电极阵列与硬膜外入路系统联合应用的安全性和成功率。
Neuromodulation. 2012 Jan-Feb;15(1):21-9; discussion 29-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2011.00419.x.
6
Revision and Replacement of Spinal Cord Stimulator Paddle Leads.脊髓刺激器桨状导联的更换和返修。
Neuromodulation. 2022 Jul;25(5):753-757. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.02.228. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
7
New technique for open placement of paddle-type spinal cord stimulator electrode in presence of epidural scar tissue.存在硬膜外瘢痕组织时开放放置桨式脊髓刺激器电极的新技术。
Neuromodulation. 2014 Dec;17(8):759-62; discussion 762. doi: 10.1111/ner.12174. Epub 2014 Apr 11.
8
Preoperative Thoracic Spine Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Spinal Cord Stimulation: Should Such a Recommendation Be an Absolute Requirement?术前胸椎磁共振成像在脊髓刺激中的应用:这样的推荐是否应该成为绝对要求?
Neuromodulation. 2022 Jul;25(5):758-762. doi: 10.1111/ner.13518. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
9
Minimally Invasive Placement of Spinal Cord Stimulator Paddle Electrodes Is Associated With Improved Perioperative and Long-Term Experience Among Neuropathic Pain Patients.脊髓刺激器桨状电极的微创植入与神经病理性疼痛患者围手术期和长期体验的改善相关。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Mar 1;43(5):324-330. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002050.
10
Retrograde thoracic spinal cord stimulation paddle placement for complex persistent spinal pain syndrome type 2.逆行胸椎脊髓刺激器置放术治疗 2 型复杂性持续性脊髓痛综合征。
Pain Pract. 2024 Mar;24(3):483-488. doi: 10.1111/papr.13322. Epub 2023 Dec 2.