Department of Spine Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, No. 126 Xiantai Street, Changchun, Jilin, China.
J Robot Surg. 2023 Dec;17(6):2597-2610. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01700-0. Epub 2023 Aug 26.
Percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA), which includes percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) and percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP). Robot-assisted (RA) and fluoroscopy-assisted (FA) are important methods for treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs), though it is still unclear which is superior. This analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of RA and FA. PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure were systematically searched, the outcomes included surgical parameters (leakage rate, operation time, number of fluoroscopic, injection volume, inclination angle), and clinical indexes (hospital stays, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Cobb angle, the midline height of vertebral). Thirteen articles involving 1094 patients were included. RA group produced better results than the FA group in the leakage rate (OR = 0.27; 95% CI 0.17-0.42; P < 0.00001), number of fluoroscopic (WMD = - 13.88; 95% CI - 18.47 to - 9.30; P < 0.00001), inclination angle (WMD = 5.02; 95% CI 4.42-5.61; P < 0.00001), hospital stays (WMD = - 0.32; 95% CI - 0.58 to - 0.05; P = 0.02), VAS within 3 days (WMD = - 0.19; 95% CI - 0.26 to - 0.12; P < 0.00001), Cobb angle within 3 days (WMD = - 1.35; 95% CI - 2.56 to - 0.14; P = 0.003) and Cobb angle after 1 month (WMD = - 1.02; 95% CI - 1.84 to - 0.20; P = 0.01). But no significant differences in operation time, injection volume, ODI, the midline height of vertebral, and VAS score after 1 month. Our analysis found that the RA group had lower cement leakage rates, number of fluoroscopic and hospital stays, a larger inclination angle, better short-term pain improvement, and Cobb angle improvement. It is worth acknowledging that robotic-assisted surgery holds promise for the development of spine surgery. The study was registered in the PROSPERO (CRD42023393497).
经皮椎体强化术(PVA),包括经皮椎体后凸成形术(PKP)和经皮椎体成形术(PVP)。机器人辅助(RA)和透视辅助(FA)是治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(OVCFs)的重要方法,但哪种方法更优仍不清楚。本分析旨在比较 RA 和 FA 的疗效和安全性。系统检索了 PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane 图书馆和中国国家知识基础设施,结果包括手术参数(渗漏率、手术时间、透视次数、注射量、倾斜角)和临床指标(住院时间、视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)、Cobb 角、椎体中线高度)。纳入了 13 项涉及 1094 名患者的研究。RA 组在渗漏率(OR = 0.27;95%CI 0.17-0.42;P < 0.00001)、透视次数(WMD = -13.88;95%CI -18.47 至 -9.30;P < 0.00001)、倾斜角(WMD = 5.02;95%CI 4.42-5.61;P < 0.00001)、住院时间(WMD = -0.32;95%CI -0.58 至 -0.05;P = 0.02)、术后 3 天 VAS(WMD = -0.19;95%CI -0.26 至 -0.12;P < 0.00001)、术后 3 天 Cobb 角(WMD = -1.35;95%CI -2.56 至 -0.14;P = 0.003)和术后 1 个月 Cobb 角(WMD = -1.02;95%CI -1.84 至 -0.20;P = 0.01)方面优于 FA 组。但在手术时间、注射量、ODI、椎体中线高度和术后 1 个月 VAS 评分方面无显著差异。我们的分析发现,RA 组的骨水泥渗漏率、透视次数和住院时间较低,倾斜角较大,短期疼痛改善和 Cobb 角改善更好。值得注意的是,机器人辅助手术为脊柱手术的发展带来了希望。该研究已在 PROSPERO(CRD42023393497)注册。