• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术前自体采血患者血管迷走反应的新风险预测评分系统。

A new risk predictive scoring system of vasovagal reactions in patients with preoperative autologous blood donation.

机构信息

Transfusion Medicine Department, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

Key Lab of High Confidence Software Technologies (Peking University), Ministry of Education School of Computer Science, Peking University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Transfus Apher Sci. 2023 Dec;62(6):103791. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2023.103791. Epub 2023 Aug 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.transci.2023.103791
PMID:37633760
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Vasovagal response (VVR) is the most common adverse reaction during blood donation and it is the main element for the safety of the patients with preoperative autologous blood donation (PABD). Accurate identification high-risk group is of great significance for PABD. Our study aimed to establish a scoring system based on the nomogram to screen the high-risk population and provide evidence for preventing the occurrence of VVRs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A number of 4829 patients underwent PABD between July 2017 and June 2020 in the first medical center of Chinese PLA Hospital were recruited, 3387 of whom were included in the training group (70 %; 108 VVRs patients vs 3279 Non-VVRs patients), 1442 were included in the validation group (30 %; 46 VVRs patients vs 1396 Non-VVRs patients). The data were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. The nomogram of the scoring system was created by using the RMS tool in R software.

RESULTS

Seven variables including BMI, hematocrit, pre-phlebotomy heart rate and systolic blood pressure, history of blood donation, age group and primary disease were selected to build the nomogram, which was shown as prediction model. And the score was 0-1 for BMI, 0-2 for hematocrit, systolic blood pressure, heart rate and no blood donation history, 0-10 for age, 0-3 for primary disease. When the total cutoff score was 11, the predictive system for identifying VVRs displayed higher diagnostic accuracy. The area under the curve, specificity, and sensitivity of the training group were 0.942, 82.41 % and 97.17 %, respectively, whereas those of the validation group were 0.836, 78.26 % and 78.15 %, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A risk predictive scoring system was successfully developed to identify high-risk VVRs group form PABD patients that performed well.

摘要

背景与目的

血管迷走性反应(VVR)是献血过程中最常见的不良反应,也是术前自体采血(PABD)患者安全的主要因素。准确识别高危人群对 PABD 具有重要意义。本研究旨在建立一种基于列线图的评分系统,以筛选高危人群,为预防 VVR 的发生提供依据。

材料与方法

回顾性分析 2017 年 7 月至 2020 年 6 月在中国人民解放军总医院第一医学中心行 PABD 的 4829 例患者的临床资料,其中 3387 例(70%)纳入训练组(108 例 VVR 患者与 3279 例非 VVR 患者),1442 例(30%)纳入验证组(46 例 VVR 患者与 1396 例非 VVR 患者)。采用单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析筛选变量,利用 R 软件中的 RMS 工具建立评分系统的列线图。

结果

筛选出 7 个变量(BMI、血细胞比容、采血前心率和收缩压、献血史、年龄组和原发疾病)构建列线图预测模型,其中 BMI 评分为 0-1 分,血细胞比容、收缩压、心率和无献血史评分为 0-2 分,年龄评分为 0-10 分,原发疾病评分为 0-3 分。当总分截点为 11 分时,预测 VVR 的系统具有较高的诊断准确性。训练组曲线下面积、特异度和敏感度分别为 0.942、82.41%和 97.17%,验证组分别为 0.836、78.26%和 78.15%。

结论

成功建立了一种风险预测评分系统,能够识别 PABD 患者中发生 VVR 的高危人群,具有较好的预测性能。

相似文献

1
A new risk predictive scoring system of vasovagal reactions in patients with preoperative autologous blood donation.术前自体采血患者血管迷走反应的新风险预测评分系统。
Transfus Apher Sci. 2023 Dec;62(6):103791. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2023.103791. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
2
Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting the risk of vasovagal reactions after plasma donation.开发和验证一种列线图,用于预测献血后血管迷走性反应的风险。
J Clin Apher. 2023 Oct;38(5):622-631. doi: 10.1002/jca.22074. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
3
Predictors of vasovagal reactions during preoperative autologous blood donation: a single-institution analysis.术前自体献血期间血管迷走神经反应的预测因素:单机构分析
Int J Hematol. 2017 Jun;105(6):812-818. doi: 10.1007/s12185-017-2204-6. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
4
Case-control study of immediate and delayed vasovagal reactions in blood donors.献血者即刻和延迟血管迷走神经反应的病例对照研究。
Vox Sang. 2016 Oct;111(3):257-265. doi: 10.1111/vox.12418. Epub 2016 May 27.
5
Evaluation of interventions to prevent vasovagal reactions among whole blood donors: rationale and design of a large cluster randomised trial.全血献血者血管迷走反应预防干预措施的评估:一项大型整群随机试验的原理和设计。
Trials. 2023 Aug 10;24(1):512. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07473-z.
6
Effect of a liberal versus a restrictive pre-donation blood pressure policy on whole-blood donor adverse reactions.宽松与严格的献血前血压政策对全血捐献者不良反应的影响。
Vox Sang. 2019 May;114(4):317-324. doi: 10.1111/vox.12772. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
7
Interventions to reduce vasovagal reactions in blood donors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.减少献血者血管迷走神经反应的干预措施:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Transfus Med. 2016 Feb;26(1):15-33. doi: 10.1111/tme.12275.
8
Vasovagal reactions in blood donors: risks, prevention and management.献血者的血管迷走神经反应:风险、预防与管理
Transfus Med. 2019 Apr;29 Suppl 1:13-22. doi: 10.1111/tme.12488. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
9
Development and validation of a scoring system to predict vasovagal reaction upon whole-blood donation.开发并验证一种评分系统,用于预测全血捐献时的血管迷走神经反应。
Vox Sang. 2024 Apr;119(4):300-307. doi: 10.1111/vox.13579. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
10
Does using applied muscle tension at strategic time points during donation reduce phlebotomist- and donor-reported vasovagal reaction rates? A three-armed randomized controlled trial.在献血过程中的关键时间点运用肌肉紧张法是否能降低采血人员和献血者报告的血管迷走神经反应率?一项三臂随机对照试验。
Transfusion. 2018 Oct;58(10):2352-2359. doi: 10.1111/trf.14940. Epub 2018 Sep 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of Preoperative Autologous Blood Donation for Surgical Treatment of Thoracic Spinal Stenosis: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.术前自体输血对胸椎管狭窄症手术治疗效果的影响:一项倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Orthop Surg. 2024 Dec;16(12):3068-3077. doi: 10.1111/os.14249. Epub 2024 Oct 2.