• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自我中心沟通网络中的普遍模式。

Universal patterns in egocentric communication networks.

作者信息

Iñiguez Gerardo, Heydari Sara, Kertész János, Saramäki Jari

机构信息

Department of Network and Data Science, Central European University, 1100, Vienna, Austria.

Department of Computer Science, Aalto University School of Science, 00076, Aalto, Finland.

出版信息

Nat Commun. 2023 Aug 26;14(1):5217. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-40888-5.

DOI:10.1038/s41467-023-40888-5
PMID:37633934
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10460427/
Abstract

Tie strengths in social networks are heterogeneous, with strong and weak ties playing different roles at the network and individual levels. Egocentric networks, networks of relationships around an individual, exhibit few strong ties and more weaker ties, as evidenced by electronic communication records. Mobile phone data has also revealed persistent individual differences within this pattern. However, the generality and driving mechanisms of social tie strength heterogeneity remain unclear. Here, we study tie strengths in egocentric networks across multiple datasets of interactions between millions of people during months to years. We find universality in tie strength distributions and their individual-level variation across communication modes, even in channels not reflecting offline social relationships. Via a simple model of egocentric network evolution, we show that the observed universality arises from the competition between cumulative advantage and random choice, two tie reinforcement mechanisms whose balance determines the diversity of tie strengths. Our results provide insight into the driving mechanisms of tie strength heterogeneity in social networks and have implications for the understanding of social network structure and individual behavior.

摘要

社会网络中的关系强度是异质的,强关系和弱关系在网络和个体层面发挥着不同的作用。以个体为中心的网络,即围绕个体的关系网络,显示出较少的强关系和较多的弱关系,电子通信记录证明了这一点。手机数据也揭示了这种模式下持续存在的个体差异。然而,社会关系强度异质性的普遍性和驱动机制仍不明确。在这里,我们研究了数百万人在数月至数年期间的多个互动数据集的以个体为中心的网络中的关系强度。我们发现关系强度分布及其在不同通信模式下的个体层面变化具有普遍性,即使在不反映线下社会关系的渠道中也是如此。通过一个简单的以个体为中心的网络演化模型,我们表明观察到的普遍性源于累积优势和随机选择这两种关系强化机制之间的竞争,这两种机制的平衡决定了关系强度的多样性。我们的结果为社会网络中关系强度异质性的驱动机制提供了见解,并对理解社会网络结构和个体行为具有启示意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a18/10460427/e22a3c0e67da/41467_2023_40888_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a18/10460427/4c1d0f048478/41467_2023_40888_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a18/10460427/42c17c4fb1fc/41467_2023_40888_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a18/10460427/e22a3c0e67da/41467_2023_40888_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a18/10460427/4c1d0f048478/41467_2023_40888_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a18/10460427/42c17c4fb1fc/41467_2023_40888_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a18/10460427/e22a3c0e67da/41467_2023_40888_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Universal patterns in egocentric communication networks.自我中心沟通网络中的普遍模式。
Nat Commun. 2023 Aug 26;14(1):5217. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-40888-5.
2
Multichannel social signatures and persistent features of ego networks.多通道社交特征及自我网络的持久特征
Appl Netw Sci. 2018;3(1):8. doi: 10.1007/s41109-018-0065-4. Epub 2018 May 29.
3
Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks.移动通信网络中的结构与连接强度
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 1;104(18):7332-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0610245104. Epub 2007 Apr 24.
4
Worth the Weight: Conceptualizing and Measuring Strong Versus Weak Tie Homophily.物有所值:界定与衡量强关系同质性与弱关系同质性
Soc Networks. 2022 Jan;68:139-147. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2021.06.003. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
5
Do age, psychosocial, and health characteristics alter the weak and strong tie composition of network diversity and core network size in urban adults?年龄、心理社会因素和健康特征会改变城市成年人社交网络多样性的强弱联系构成以及核心社交网络规模吗?
SSM Popul Health. 2016 Aug 25;2:623-631. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.08.009. eCollection 2016 Dec.
6
Time varying networks and the weakness of strong ties.时变网络与强关系的弱点。
Sci Rep. 2014 Feb 10;4:4001. doi: 10.1038/srep04001.
7
Strength matters: Tie strength as a causal driver of networks' information benefits.强度很重要:连接强度作为网络信息效益的因果驱动因素。
Soc Sci Res. 2017 Jul;65:268-281. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.11.003. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
8
Strong and weak tie homophily in adolescent friendship networks: An analysis of same-race and same-gender ties.青少年友谊网络中的强弱关系同质性:对同种族和同性别关系的分析。
Netw Sci (Camb Univ Press). 2022 Sep;10(3):283-300. doi: 10.1017/nws.2022.24. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
9
Diversity, integration, and variability of intergenerational relationships in old age: New insights from personal network research.代际关系在老年中的多样性、整合性和可变性:个人网络研究的新视角。
Soc Sci Res. 2024 Mar;119:102991. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2024.102991. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
10
The influence of strong and weak ties in physician peer networks on new drug adoption.医生同行网络中强关系和弱关系对新药采用的影响。
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2023 Mar;23(1):133-147. doi: 10.1007/s10754-022-09335-8. Epub 2022 Jul 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Minority identity and social structures shape diffusion dynamics of minority languages: a combined macro and micro approach.少数群体身份与社会结构塑造少数族裔语言的传播动态:一种宏观与微观相结合的方法。
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Apr 16;12(4):250011. doi: 10.1098/rsos.250011. eCollection 2025 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Cumulative effects of triadic closure and homophily in social networks.社会网络中三元闭包和同质性的累积效应。
Sci Adv. 2020 May 8;6(19):eaax7310. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aax7310. eCollection 2020 May.
2
Multichannel social signatures and persistent features of ego networks.多通道社交特征及自我网络的持久特征
Appl Netw Sci. 2018;3(1):8. doi: 10.1007/s41109-018-0065-4. Epub 2018 May 29.
3
Cognitive resource allocation determines the organization of personal networks.认知资源分配决定了个人网络的组织方式。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Aug 14;115(33):8316-8321. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1719233115. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
4
Personality traits and ego-network dynamics.人格特质与自我网络动态
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 2;12(3):e0173110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173110. eCollection 2017.
5
What Big Data tells: Sampling the social network by communication channels.大数据告诉我们:通过通讯渠道抽样社交网络。
Phys Rev E. 2016 Nov;94(5-1):052319. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.94.052319. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
6
PAFit: A Statistical Method for Measuring Preferential Attachment in Temporal Complex Networks.PAFit:一种用于测量时间复杂网络中优先连接的统计方法。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 17;10(9):e0137796. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137796. eCollection 2015.
7
Measuring large-scale social networks with high resolution.以高分辨率测量大规模社会网络。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 25;9(4):e95978. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095978. eCollection 2014.
8
Persistence of social signatures in human communication.人类交流中社会特征的持久性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jan 21;111(3):942-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1308540110. Epub 2014 Jan 6.
9
Temporal motifs reveal homophily, gender-specific patterns, and group talk in call sequences.时间模式揭示了呼叫序列中的同群现象、性别特定模式和群体交流。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Nov 5;110(45):18070-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1307941110. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
10
Modeling users' activity on twitter networks: validation of Dunbar's number.在推特网络上模拟用户的活动:邓巴数的验证。
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e22656. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022656. Epub 2011 Aug 3.